Large Normal 224 | Endgame

[PenguinPower]

Votecount 1.06

Tea

(6): Reundo, Saladman27, Flavor Leaf, Billy Pilgrim, Zote the Mighty, NorwegianboyEE

Layla

(3): Gamma Emerald, Vorkuta, Luca Blight

NorwegianboyEE

(3): splitfarvle, Dunnstral, davesaz

Luca Blight

(1): Chemist1422

davesaz

(1): Layla

Not Voting

(4): Tea, PMysterious, Fish Monger, Wake88

With 18 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.

Deadline

: (expired on 2019-11-22 10:45:00)

[NorwegianboyEE]

He only has 8 posts total on his profile. I have no idea what his meta is.

[Billy Pilgrim]

I don't actually find tea scummy. I have him as null, but true null, not leaning towards any alignment.

1. People showed concern about 74. It's a bit overzealous and overall bad yes. Does it draw aggro? Yes. But is it scummy? Remember that bad != scummy.

2. His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

Now why do I say such thing when I pretty much don't have any read on tea? Because I think the direction of arguments thrown against him is wrong and that kind of arguments only bring wasted pages in the game.

@ Layla - How do you feel that of those 20 posts he was referencing, Norskie onlybhad 2 of those posts and they were the ones that Aaron called to your attention? Does that progression feel natural to you or does it maybe feel driven by the fact by the fact that others seemed willing to vote him in those 20 posts?

[Layla]

He only has 8 posts total on his profile. I have no idea what his meta is.

Who cares about meta? It's all about what he posted in this game and what he've shown consistently.

[Layla]

I don't actually find tea scummy. I have him as null, but true null, not leaning towards any alignment.

1. People showed concern about 74. It's a bit overzealous and overall bad yes. Does it draw aggro? Yes. But is it scummy? Remember that bad != scummy.

2. His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

Now why do I say such thing when I pretty much don't have any read on tea? Because I think the direction of arguments thrown against him is wrong and that kind of arguments only bring wasted pages in the game.

@ Layla - How do you feel that of those 20 posts he was referencing, Norskie onlybhad 2 of those posts and they were the ones that Aaron called to your attention? Does that progression feel natural to you or does it maybe feel driven by the fact by the fact that others seemed willing to vote him in those 20 posts?

Already addressed.

[Layla]

what he've shown consistently

Yes he has 8 posts. But post count doesn't matter when you can see that 8 posts and still able to determine that it looks like how he plays.

[Vorkuta]

Oh boy a post # discussion.

Wake me when something spicy happens, and more votes on papa leaf in the meanwhile please and thank you
Also VOTE: Tea

[Layla]

This is probably spicy.

VOTE: Vorkuta

[Zote the Mighty]

Guess who fucked up and posted under the wrong account!

Oh, so Zote is an Aaron alt. So that's another person on the list I've played with before.

Oops I alt-slipped.

[Zote the Mighty]

Oh. I thought the posts in between was his earlier posts. Never mind on my #115 then. My overall point still stands though.

Although I could see them being scummy.

So your overall point is that Tea is not scummy, but then you immediately follow that up with 'I could see Tea being scummy?'

[Zote the Mighty]

Oh boy a post # discussion.

Wake me when something spicy happens, and more votes on papa leaf in the meanwhile please and thank you
Also VOTE: Tea

So you want more votes on Flavor Leaf yet you don't vote for him yourself?

[Tea]

So first you called the votes on Norwegian bad, and now you’re calling the ones on Layla bad because they should be on NorwegianboyEE instead?
Thought processes can change?
Explain, please.

And why are

you

not voting NorwegianboyEE for that matter, Tea?

Does it need to be?

[Tea]

I scumread Chemist already.

Ok boomer

[Tea]

I don't actually find tea scummy. I have him as null, but true null, not leaning towards any alignment.

1. People showed concern about 74. It's a bit overzealous and overall bad yes. Does it draw aggro? Yes. But is it scummy? Remember that bad != scummy.

2. His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

Now why do I say such thing when I pretty much don't have any read on tea? Because I think the direction of arguments thrown against him is wrong and that kind of arguments only bring wasted pages in the game.

Goodposting I see

[Tea]

His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

If all it took was 2 minor posts from me between him vaguely implying to TR me for him to change his read and get needlessly aggressive then it wasn't a particularly strong TR in the first place.

Calling a vote bad isn't a TR; and this isn't semantics.

I think the line of reasoning people took to vote you was bad and the line of reasoning people took to vote you 20 posts later was substantially better.

[Tea]

He only has 8 posts total on his profile. I have no idea what his meta is.

I mean, that's kind of the point...

[Flavor Leaf]

Lol, Vorkuta doesn’t seriously try to shade at me if he’s scum

[Flavor Leaf]

Oh boy a post # discussion.

Wake me when something spicy happens, and more votes on papa leaf in the meanwhile please and thank you
Also VOTE: Tea

So you want more votes on Flavor Leaf yet you don't vote for him yourself?

I prefer if you preface “Flavor Leaf” with The Awesome, the mighty, Emperor, or sexy.

Cut out Flavor, and add Papa will suffice as well.

[Billy Pilgrim]

His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

If all it took was 2 minor posts from me between him vaguely implying to TR me for him to change his read and get needlessly aggressive then it wasn't a particularly strong TR in the first place.

Calling a vote bad isn't a TR; and this isn't semantics.

I think the line of reasoning people took to vote you was bad and the line of reasoning people took to vote you 20 posts later was substantially better.

I'm glad you made this post. Because the 3 before it made me want you to eat rope in the next 24 hours.

Why did you think splitfarvle's original vote on Norwegian was bad? I liked that post. And what was wrong with Zote pointing out that Norwegian shaded the slot waited for someone else to vote it then hopped on?

[Flavor Leaf]

i have a weird gut feeling we hit scum in Tea for completely wrong reasons and now we’re in a holding pattern because scum’s awkward.

I don’t actually have a Tea read myself

[Tea]

His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

If all it took was 2 minor posts from me between him vaguely implying to TR me for him to change his read and get needlessly aggressive then it wasn't a particularly strong TR in the first place.

Calling a vote bad isn't a TR; and this isn't semantics.

I think the line of reasoning people took to vote you was bad and the line of reasoning people took to vote you 20 posts later was substantially better.

I'm glad you made this post. Because the 3 before it made me want you to eat rope in the next 24 hours.

Why did you think splitfarvle's original vote on Norwegian was bad? I liked that post. And what was wrong with Zote pointing out that Norwegian shaded the slot waited for someone else to vote it then hopped on?

Because you don't need to vote immediately to contribute to the game

[Layla]

Oh. I thought the posts in between was his earlier posts. Never mind on my #115 then. My overall point still stands though.

Although I could see them being scummy.

So your overall point is that Tea is not scummy, but then you immediately follow that up with 'I could see Tea being scummy?'

That was regarding Nor's posts, not Tea's.

[Billy Pilgrim]

His stance flip on Nor. He did say that his read on Nor have gotten worse over the span of 20 or so posts. Did people miss that?

If all it took was 2 minor posts from me between him vaguely implying to TR me for him to change his read and get needlessly aggressive then it wasn't a particularly strong TR in the first place.

Calling a vote bad isn't a TR; and this isn't semantics.

I think the line of reasoning people took to vote you was bad and the line of reasoning people took to vote you 20 posts later was substantially better.

I'm glad you made this post. Because the 3 before it made me want you to eat rope in the next 24 hours.

Why did you think splitfarvle's original vote on Norwegian was bad? I liked that post. And what was wrong with Zote pointing out that Norwegian shaded the slot waited for someone else to vote it then hopped on?

Because you don't need to vote immediately to contribute to the game

Do you think that's the point they were making in those posts? I could see how you'd read splitfarvle's that way, but Zote seemed to be commenting on the fact that Norwegian seemed to wait for someone else to join a wagon before voting.

[Tea]

Like... he was making a good point, but his tone implied he was joking? I dunno.

You're probably right that it's a good point tbh

[Gamma Emerald]

The difficult thing about this setup is that i'm most definitely going to forget at least a couple of people here, especially the inactive ones. So if they're scum they can just coast along undetected because there are so many distractions.

Do you think everyone else will forget about them if you do?