In post 326, davesaz wrote: In post 324, Fish Monger wrote:
I have a warm spot when I think about Dunn too, but its because he voted wake.
Seems like that bar is a little low.
A poke at a lurker is protown but not necessarily townie.
I'm gonna double down on this.
My initial comment about Wake being a lurker was outright wrong, as I already pointed out.
Wake's posting looks pretty odd, as rightly pointed out by Luca.
Dunnstral voted Wake, said the ISO was bad, but said
nothing
about why it was bad.
That's actually not too out of character for Dunn, I rarely see any substantial explanations from him. The point here is that it's NAI.
Fish Monger and Chemist liked Dunn but didn't explain anything more than the vote on Wake as a reason, when Dunn's ISO is devoid of anything but votes with no explanations.
Between Wake, Dunn, Fish Monger and Chemist at least one is probably scum and possibly two. I loathe association hunting before a flip so I have no interest in which combination. I'd settle for finding some reads at this point, and that's going to be hard without some material.
It's too late at night to dig into all of this, in particular where any of these are on the larger wagons. So this post serves as a reminder to self of where to look.
Pedit: Sure, why not. I still think Norwegian could be scum, but wagons are what we need and which scum matters little.
VOTE: Wake