Big Four Mafia! Game Over!

[Looker]

I don't get that - "forgetting to use your night action" isn't normal to me. I get to state as such. I don't see how it was 'low-hanging fruit', and you can't use "OMGUS" every time someone addresses odd behavior. Especially when there was no knee-jerk vote involved.

Also, I have little reason to believe your role is valuable. If it was that great, I doubt we'd have four dead Town in a row. You're bluffing.

[chennisden]

For starters why did you tunnel Titus

[chennisden]

Do you have a good reason to believe his role is not valuable

And if so

Why does his bluff make him scum

[Doctor Drew]

I never said my role was super duper guaranteed game winning powerful, just that it is stupid and anti-town to reveal it.

[Alchemist21]

Looker, I have given my result already when I said Flubber is innocent. This was pointed out again to BS by Titus just before that big post of yours. I am voting you because you have ignored the result and continue to vote Flubber, and the first time you were called out for this you tried to pass it off as some kind of reminder to yourself. I don’t see your actions here as coming from Town.

[Looker]

For starters why did you tunnel Titus

Where did I tunnel Titus? I don't recall doing that. I suspected him because, as stated in Post 2674, "I didn't trust the cover of claims that was going around - I thought yours and pisskop's claim was the least confirmable."

Do you have a good reason to believe his role is not valuable

And if so

Why does his bluff make him scum

• I felt he was over-exaggerating the value of his role because, as stated in Post 2700, "If it was that great, I doubt we'd have four dead Town in a row."
  
• I never said Drew was scum or that his bluff implied as much. This is the second time you've potentially let slip foreknowledge of someone's role/alignment. First with Flubbernugget, now with Doctor Drew

[Looker]

Looker, I have given my result already when I said Flubber is innocent. This was pointed out again to BS by Titus just before that big post of yours. I am voting you because you have ignored the result and continue to vote Flubber, and the first time you were called out for this you tried to pass it off as some kind of reminder to yourself. I don’t see your actions here as coming from Town.

I have no reason to believe you or your results.

I thought the plan was for you to check

me

last night for a PT.

Well, Alchemist can check

Looker

for a PT.

I also don't feel that bad distrusting you, knowing that I'm not alone.

I don't trust Alchemist at all though

That's the beauty. We don't need to trust him. We'll confirm his results at lylo plus 1 day worst case scenario. He could also claim something else but in that case there's nothing we can do to prevent it.

You also didn't answer my question - what were your results? I feel like you're letting me down by potentially wasting an investigation on a lurker when it could've been used to confirm an active player. That could've also been "purposely" done.

[chennisden]

You amaze me to no end

[chennisden]

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE RESULT

VOTE ALCHEMIST INSTEAD OF FLUB

[chennisden]

FLUB CAN ONLY BE SCUM IF ALCH IS SCUM

[chennisden]

You're basically going "nuh uh I technically didn't say it" when you basically said it

and going "you technically said it" when what I mean is common sense

[Looker]

I'M NOT CONTENT TO MOVE PAST THIS DAY UNTIL FLUB CONTRIBUTES

[chennisden]

Hi scum looking for something to distract from the game, I'm chennis

[chennisden]

Also Alch why did you choose to go to flub instead

[Alchemist21]

I said early on D2 I could check Flubber. Checking the Miller claim is a common sense move.

[Alchemist21]

Looker, I have given my result already when I said Flubber is innocent. This was pointed out again to BS by Titus just before that big post of yours. I am voting you because you have ignored the result and continue to vote Flubber, and the first time you were called out for this you tried to pass it off as some kind of reminder to yourself. I don’t see your actions here as coming from Town.

I have no reason to believe you or your results.

I thought the plan was for you to check

me

last night for a PT.

Well, Alchemist can check

Looker

for a PT.

I also don't feel that bad distrusting you, knowing that I'm not alone.

I don't trust Alchemist at all though

That's the beauty. We don't need to trust him. We'll confirm his results at lylo plus 1 day worst case scenario. He could also claim something else but in that case there's nothing we can do to prevent it.

You also didn't answer my question - what were your results? I feel like you're letting me down by potentially wasting an investigation on a lurker when it could've been used to confirm an active player. That could've also been "purposely" done.

Wtf is this post.

“Letting you down?” I don’t owe you anything.

Flubber doesn’t have a PT. That is my result. If you weren’t being deliberately obtuse it would be obvious to you.

And I choose my own actions. Nobody else does.

[Doctor Drew]

Looker, I have given my result already when I said Flubber is innocent. This was pointed out again to BS by Titus just before that big post of yours. I am voting you because you have ignored the result and continue to vote Flubber, and the first time you were called out for this you tried to pass it off as some kind of reminder to yourself. I don’t see your actions here as coming from Town.

I have no reason to believe you or your results.

I thought the plan was for you to check

me

last night for a PT.

Well, Alchemist can check

Looker

for a PT.

I also don't feel that bad distrusting you, knowing that I'm not alone.

I don't trust Alchemist at all though

That's the beauty. We don't need to trust him. We'll confirm his results at lylo plus 1 day worst case scenario. He could also claim something else but in that case there's nothing we can do to prevent it.

You also didn't answer my question - what were your results? I feel like you're letting me down by potentially wasting an investigation on a lurker when it could've been used to confirm an active player. That could've also been "purposely" done.

Wtf is this post.

“Letting you down?” I don’t owe you anything.

Flubber doesn’t have a PT. That is my result. If you weren’t being deliberately obtuse it would be obvious to you.

And I choose my own actions. Nobody else does.

What strikes me odd about Looker as well.....they really really are mad they weren't the target of the PT cop. You are more worried about possibly clearing you then helping solve the game.

[Doctor Drew]

Spoiler: offtopic

Wait...where's my sig?

You need to make sure the relevant box is checked when posting.

You are truly a gentleman and a scholar.

[chennisden]

Looker is trying to appear mad while relieved and simultaneously trying to set up an alch discredit when she inevitably gets copped

Right

[Titus]

FLUB CAN ONLY BE SCUM IF ALCH IS SCUM

I'M NOT CONTENT TO MOVE PAST THIS DAY UNTIL FLUB CONTRIBUTES

I agree we should not move past this day until Flubber contributes or gets a replacement.

I agree we shouldn't vote Flubber but Traitor!Flubber is a theoretical possibility in an Alch!Town universe. That fits perfectly with why he was not vanillaized. The other possibility is one shot.

I don't want to lynch Flubber today but I do think Looker is correct the slot should contribute.

Looker, please invite Flubber for now.

[Titus]

Looker is trying to appear mad while relieved and simultaneously trying to set up an alch discredit when she inevitably gets copped

Right

This is absurd.

[Doctor Drew]

Where the fuck is Creature?

I am still not claiming, I will only divulge my role to confirmed Town. If you are in fact a neighborizer, put me in a hood with either Titus or Egix and I will tell them my role. Then they can do whatever they feel comfortable doing with this info. This also has a secondary effect of confirming your(Creatures) role.

I am not giving my role when there are scum eyes looking.

Also forgot I wasn't voting Looker.

VOTE: Looker

Titus....are you game?

[yurkin]

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE RESULT

VOTE ALCHEMIST INSTEAD OF FLUB

This was so big picked my attention
What results

[Titus]

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE RESULT

VOTE ALCHEMIST INSTEAD OF FLUB

This was so big picked my attention
What results

Alch said Flubber doesn't have a PT which makes flub like 85% innocent if Alch is (Flub could be traitor).

[Titus]

Where the fuck is Creature?

I am still not claiming, I will only divulge my role to confirmed Town. If you are in fact a neighborizer, put me in a hood with either Titus or Egix and I will tell them my role. Then they can do whatever they feel comfortable doing with this info. This also has a secondary effect of confirming your(Creatures) role.

I am not giving my role when there are scum eyes looking.

Also forgot I wasn't voting Looker.

VOTE: Looker

Titus....are you game?

If I trusted you, I would be. I don't. I don't see why you didn't push for this when Egix was the sole conftown.

I need to see you get away from mechanics.