Big Four Mafia! Game Over!

gobbledygook · Post Post #2950 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:22 am

In post 2948, jjh927 wrote:
In post 2849, jjh927 wrote:
In post 2790, jjh927 wrote:Find the towny

Doctor Drew
Chennisden
Blatant Scum
Creature
YodaVader

It’s weird to me that you include two people who have been vanillalized but not Yurkin. Why?

gobbledygook · Post Post #2951 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:23 am

In post 2949, chennisden wrote:I think lynching Alchemist today is kinda bad necause there has been objectively worse stuff this game, gobble.

Yeah I agree. But his play has been bad this game. I expect him to be a more cerebral player and he has not shown it this game.

Why do you think Creature’s slot has been bad?

chennisden · Post Post #2952 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:25 am

Btw the source of the guilty is pretty obvious, yes?

And it probably is an actual guilty this time, yes?

And it's failing to generate reactions, yes?

SO WE SHOULDNT WITHHOLD THE GUILTY ANYMORE, YES?

chennisden · Post Post #2953 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:26 am

In post 2951, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2949, chennisden wrote:I think lynching Alchemist today is kinda bad necause there has been objectively worse stuff this game, gobble.
Yeah I agree. But his play has been bad this game. I expect him to be a more cerebral player and he has not shown it this game.

Why do you think Creature’s slot has been bad?

Terrible responses, pushed early massclaim and kinda is just coasting now

chennisden · Post Post #2954 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:27 am

I think we should lynch Creature or Yoda today

Take your pick

chennisden · Post Post #2955 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:27 am

Actually I am fairly convinced it should just be Creature today

jjh927 · Post Post #2956 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:29 am

In post 2950, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2948, jjh927 wrote:
In post 2849, jjh927 wrote:
In post 2790, jjh927 wrote:Find the towny

Doctor Drew
Chennisden
Blatant Scum
Creature
YodaVader
It’s weird to me that you include two people who have been vanillalized but not Yurkin. Why?

Because Yurkin obvtowned at around the start of day 2 and is verifiably vanillaised. BS and Drew could very easily just be claiming to be vanillaised. Neither has obvtowned. In fact, BS has been outright scummy the whole game through. I'm currently thinking Drew might be the towny in my 5 though.

jjh927 · Post Post #2957 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:32 am

Personally it's weird as shit to me that you townread Chennis based on TSE's play and that's probably the read I want you to revisit most

gobbledygook · Post Post #2958 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:36 am

I wish I could give you more references but you should read Lady 5’s iso in Masquerade. It is like the same behavior here. Lady 5 was TSE and he was town. He’s jus manic in his posting.

jjh927 · Post Post #2959 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:39 am

Do you think it's likely he'll suddenly stop being erratic if he rolls scum

jjh927 · Post Post #2960 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:43 am

It's not about his posting style. I'm saying a lot of things he did were done with clear scum motivation behind them

gobbledygook · Post Post #2961 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:47 am

In post 2960, jjh927 wrote:It's not about his posting style. I'm saying a lot of things he did were done with clear scum motivation behind them

I do think he is less erratic as scum. I dont have any basis for that though.
I mean I disagree pretty heavily that his tracker claim was scum motivated. I don’t really understand the argument you made to say that it was scummy. It seemed like you were pinning Alchemists mishandling of his own role on TSE. Is that a fair assessment?

Titus · Post Post #2962 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:53 am

In post 2943, gobbledygook wrote:Or he is the person in Titus’s hood that has the guilty.

Ding Ding Ding.

I'm still withholding who it's on yet.

Titus · Post Post #2963 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:54 am

@Creature, Where are you darling?

gobbledygook · Post Post #2964 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:54 am

In post 2962, Titus wrote:
In post 2943, gobbledygook wrote:Or he is the person in Titus’s hood that has the guilty.
Ding Ding Ding.

I'm still withholding who it's on yet.

Yeah I am 100% not lynching that person.

Titus · Post Post #2965 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:55 am

In post 2964, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2962, Titus wrote:
In post 2943, gobbledygook wrote:Or he is the person in Titus’s hood that has the guilty.
Ding Ding Ding.

I'm still withholding who it's on yet.
Yeah I am 100% not lynching that person.

Why?

gobbledygook · Post Post #2966 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:55 am

If it is Creature though I’m gonna be so sad cause I agree with chennisden’s remarks.

gobbledygook · Post Post #2967 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:56 am

In post 2965, Titus wrote:
In post 2964, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2962, Titus wrote:
In post 2943, gobbledygook wrote:Or he is the person in Titus’s hood that has the guilty.
Ding Ding Ding.

I'm still withholding who it's on yet.
Yeah I am 100% not lynching that person.
Why?

I don’t trust Alchemist.

Titus · Post Post #2968 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 4:58 am

In post 2967, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2965, Titus wrote:
In post 2964, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2962, Titus wrote:
In post 2943, gobbledygook wrote:Or he is the person in Titus’s hood that has the guilty.
Ding Ding Ding.

I'm still withholding who it's on yet.
Yeah I am 100% not lynching that person.
Why?
I don’t trust Alchemist.

What if it's someone you already scumread though?

jjh927 · Post Post #2969 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:00 am

In post 2961, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 2960, jjh927 wrote:It's not about his posting style. I'm saying a lot of things he did were done with clear scum motivation behind them
I do think he is less erratic as scum. I dont have any basis for that though.
I mean I disagree pretty heavily that his tracker claim was scum motivated. I don’t really understand the argument you made to say that it was scummy. It seemed like you were pinning Alchemists mishandling of his own role on TSE. Is that a fair assessment?

Alch was voting Pisskop, but had not claimed a result or even that he had one until TSE claimed to have tracked him to Pisskop and demanded to know what he did, which definitely increased the scale of that interaction and thus it ended only when both claimed. TSE also had plenty of reason to claim there as scum in that a lot of people scumread him for doing fuck all besides being a detractive presence from the game, and suddenly he was able to coast off of being a verified tracker.

Titus · Post Post #2970 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:02 am

In post 2954, chennisden wrote:I think we should lynch Creature or Yoda today

Take your pick

I acknowledge this post and good scumhunting without confirming or denying this is the path we should take. I only act this way because I feel we should lynch between Alch and the guilty.

gobbledygook · Post Post #2971 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:02 am

Ugh. Well, that would mean my PoE would change. Honestly, as a replacement if we kill the guilty result and it was a fakeclaim I will feel little responsibility for the loss. So I guess it doesn’t really matter to me.

That said, I have been thinking that between my role, Crimson’s role, and Alchemist’s role we may have been designed to get guilties in only a portion of the scum team each and collectively we could get guilties on the entire team.

Titus · Post Post #2972 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:06 am

In post 2971, gobbledygook wrote:Ugh. Well, that would mean my PoE would change. Honestly, as a replacement if we kill the guilty result and it was a fakeclaim I will feel little responsibility for the loss. So I guess it doesn’t really matter to me.

That said, I have been thinking that between my role, Crimson’s role, and Alchemist’s role we may have been designed to get guilties in only a portion of the scum team each and collectively we could get guilties on the entire team.

So to be clear, you think Alch's result is on town...whoever it is?

But then why the second paragraph? Are you uncertain?

gobbledygook · Post Post #2973 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:08 am

I am uncertain now if the guilty is on someone I’m already independently PoE scumreading. It would make it more likely that Alchemist is telling the truth.

Titus · Post Post #2974 (ISO) » Thu Dec 19, 2019 5:10 am

In post 2973, gobbledygook wrote:I am uncertain now if the guilty is on someone I’m already independently PoE scumreading. It would make it more likely that Alchemist is telling the truth.

So you'd judge Alchemist based on your PoE and no TV the reactions of people to the guilty?