In post 44, Uncrowned wrote:That's half-joking but man that's a bad reaction P1, especially for a setup like this where lynching townies gives us a revenge kill anyway as worst case scenario. If you're that confident in finding scum, you wouldn't react poorly to being pressured like that. You'd be confident in shooting acum with your revenge ability.
This is a really dumb post.
Correctly venging 1 scum does a lot less for town than correct lynching scum and getting to evens and gaining a mislynch.
It also prevents me from affecting future lynches.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
I'm attempting to maintain a 75%ish town winrate and me getting lynched and correctly venging scum never gives town a 75% chance of winning the remainder of the game.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
If anything as scum I would care a shit ton less about getting voted because I would know that scum aren't going to quickhammer me and I should be reasonably confident in my ability to NOT get voted by all 4 town D1???
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
Explain why you want to get shot if you're wrong, then? You think the game is immediately lost if you're wrong so we might as well end it? Doesn't make sense to me.
Okay that's fine but you're still basically telling people to throw the game if you're wrong which I don't really like. Maybe not scummy perse but not really something I agree with personally if you're town
I'm saying that I think towns winrate is higher if they sheep me today and have me dayvigged if I'm wrong than it is allowing me to get mislynched because one town is being an idiot. I think that's objectively true. I think towns winrate is even higher if they sheep me and then don't vengekill me if I'm wrong but that's a tough sell in this lobby given that CT policy lynches me by default and several other players are going to be paranoid of me playing town leader as scum.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
In post 61, RadiantCowbells wrote:I want to win this game and explaining why my actions are in service of winning the game is part of winning the game here. Am I wrong?
You're appealing to emotion and implying town can't win without you. Not only do I find it scummy, I find it quite obnoxious.
I mean you know it's true and you also know it's not a scumtell for me and I think you would know better than to scumread me for saying that I'd prefer to be listened to and venged if wrong than not listened to or lynched without getting to set towns affairs in order.
I think that you're scum Karnage.
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
shit my math is wrong. I was thinking 2 scum. disregard my previous post
Also there's this.
Not sure if I need to explain this further for the benefit of the newer players in the list but forgetting that there's 3 scum instead of 2 scum happens a lot from scum that think in terms of 'ok there's 2 other scum'
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
I find it unfathomable that you would consent to venging me if I lynch wrong and then further push the matter calling me scum. Shouldn't forcing me to bus if I'm scum or die be good enough?
2019 stats: Town WR 76.7%, overall WR 81.667%, 1 scum defeat involving a major mod error in lylo vs 8 scum wins.
I'm just going to remove myself from the situation I think. I just want to enjoy playing the game, whether I win or lose. I don't think that's going to be possible here. maybe next time. good luck all.
