Mini Normal 2111 [Game Over!]

skitter30 · Post Post #1400 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:35 am

In post 1387, Looker wrote:Is there a quota to how many times I have to ask a question before it gets answered? Also, who/what is Boon? (x100 if there really is a quota)

Which question?

Wake1 · Post Post #1401 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:37 am

I'm not sure what the normal Town play on this is, but I was sent a letter by a Mailman last night. Obviously don't reveal who you are. They didn't really say anything of importance, either.

skitter30 · Post Post #1402 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:42 am

In post 1394, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1392, Wake1 wrote:Great.

Starting to feel like we're fucked.
Y

Wake1 · Post Post #1403 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:47 am

In post 1402, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1394, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1392, Wake1 wrote:Great.

Starting to feel like we're fucked.
Y

This was supposed to be a back-handed comment on how stupid some of these guys have been.

skitter30 · Post Post #1404 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:50 am

Can i interest you in voting garmr?

Wake1 · Post Post #1405 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:52 am

In post 1404, skitter30 wrote:Can i interest you in voting garmr?

Why?

skitter30 · Post Post #1406 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:58 am

He's scummy

Wake1 · Post Post #1407 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 1:58 am

Well shit, I'm convinced.

skitter30 · Post Post #1408 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:02 am

I dont think that was a town-motivated reaction test

Wake1 · Post Post #1409 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:06 am

Garmr's reaction test?

How exactly do you get to decide which ones are Scum and Town motivated?

Whimsy?

AaronFrost · Post Post #1410 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:14 am

VOTE COUNT 2.02

tictac [0]:

Wake88 [0]:

Skellen [0]:

skitter30 [2]:

Dunnstral, tictac

Garmr [1]:

skitter30

january [0]:

Looker [0]:

Dunnstral [4] [L-2]:

Skellen, Saudade, january, Garmr

Sujimichi [0]:

UnaBombaH [0]:

Saudade [0]:

Not Voting [4]:

Wake88, Looker, Sujimichi, UnaBombaH

With 11 in play, it takes 6 votes to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-01-02 22:00:00)

Notes

- skitter30 is regularly V/LA on Fridays and Saturdays
- Wake88 has limited access until 12/26

skitter30 · Post Post #1411 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:15 am

In post 1409, Wake1 wrote:Garmr's reaction test?

How exactly do you get to decide which ones are Scum and Town motivated?

Whimsy?

Not sure what you're asking

Wake1 · Post Post #1412 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 2:17 am

In post 1411, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1409, Wake1 wrote:Garmr's reaction test?

How exactly do you get to decide which ones are Scum and Town motivated?

Whimsy?
Not sure what you're asking

I'm talking about your #1408.

skitter30 · Post Post #1413 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 3:47 am

i mean, how do you figure out if anything is scum or town motivated ?

wrt to garmr:

1. no, i didn't get fruit

2. i was wary of another complex/simple/disloyal/loyal modifier since fl flipped complex, and i don't trust garmr enough to give him any such info

3. given how he started the phase voting for me, i was p sure he was bluffing

4. what was the point of this reaction test? if i had said i hadn't received any ... then what? how would that have shed any light on my alignment ?

5. if that reaction test convinced him i'm scum, why is he voting for dunn, exactly? you know, the same person i've been actively canvassing votes for this phase?

Skellen · Post Post #1414 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:25 am

Bizarre conversations seem to be the theme of this D2. I like it in a weird way.

Skellen · Post Post #1415 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:25 am

In post 1263, Garmr wrote:
In post 1256, Skellen wrote:
In post 1240, Garmr wrote:btw the thought on wake if not clear is I thought the he handle flavor is scummy but I think his play before that was null-town. So weighing it was a slip or if i'm looking to far into things.
I get your read, but I don't get what slip you mean?
Slipped out that flavor was town in her thought process's.

I am afraid I am blind then, I don't see anything like that in Wake's ISO. Or were the slip part about skitter? Wasn't clear by the original post.

Skellen · Post Post #1416 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:26 am

tictac, who are you scumreading? So far for D2 I saw you sheeping FL infamous last words about Una (where you are null), sheeping skitter on to Dunn (I think I remember though you wouldn't fight his lynch on D1) and now you followed Garmr to skitter due to skitter's reaction to Garmr's gambit. Can't really tell by this trajectory where you sincerely are.

Skellen · Post Post #1417 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:27 am

In post 1320, UnaBombaH wrote: I was still hopeful he'd say something that would've made me back off.
I would've come clean today anyway, and backed Boon the rest of the game.

I think I can get your thought process on what you were trying to accomplish, but I don't know if this all fits together.

I don't get why FL would immediately think you are town if he would have seen (or even saw) your "softening", like what if he simply overlooked it without any ill intention or just didn't believed it? Ultimately he didn't even voted for you.

Your second line is weird. So if the FL lynch would have failed yesterday you would have just dropped your case against him? Why?

I also find it hard to believe you would have dropped the case against him, because even when skitter got cold feet about lynching FL temporarily and suggested to leash FL with directing him into a certain pool of players and lynching him on another day (and Sujimichi unvoting FL) you immediately showed up and threw in as "but" that this would be the way for scum!FL to make it into lategame (#1110). The implication of this post doesn't sound like you would have backed FL next day.

skitter30 · Post Post #1418 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:27 am

Oh ya i no longer tr tictac

Skellen · Post Post #1419 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:28 am

In post 1356, tictac wrote: like, maybe garm is a loyal fruitvendor, or maybe it's just a gambit.
u know if ya received fruit or not.

not answering that question was SCUMMY ASF

Why would it be that scummy? I am aware you are townreading Garmr (at least you were D1), but what assures it to anyone that this would be town gambit? It could as well be scum fishing for roles and considering skitter isn't townreading Garmr I think a reluctant reaction towards that gambit is imo pretty comprehensible. Especially because a town investigative already flipped.

Skellen · Post Post #1420 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:29 am

In post 1400, skitter30 wrote:
In post 1387, Looker wrote:Is there a quota to how many times I have to ask a question before it gets answered? Also, who/what is Boon? (x100 if there really is a quota)
Which question?

Probably #1281.

Not that I think that the questions are that urgent besides Una's Dunn read.

Skellen · Post Post #1421 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:31 am

After going through Gamma's ISO I am more inclined to think he was killed for just being townie. Going by his reads it would incriminate Dunn, Garmr and tictac. Not necessarily a bad direction, but wifomy though.

If anything else I think he was the only one who was vocally townreading the Maria slot, so a hot take might be that the Gamma kill doesn't necessarily come from that slot, but since Maria was already replaced, eh. The Maria/Looker slot is the only slot I am null about, hope to see more from him.

tictac · Post Post #1422 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:58 am

In post 1413, skitter30 wrote:i mean, how do you figure out if anything is scum or town motivated ?

wrt to garmr:

1.
no, i didn't get fruit

2. i was wary of another complex/simple/disloyal/loyal modifier since fl flipped complex, and
i don't trust garmr enough to give him any such info

ya clearly do tho. see point 1 of yer post.

I do not believe ya jumped to complex/simple instead of the way more common loyal.

3. given how he started the phase voting for me, i was p sure he was bluffing

so why not simply say ya didn't get fruit, if ya didn't fear he might actually be loyal?
ya clearly not withholding that info from scumteam, since ya just freely gave it.

4. what was the point of this reaction test? if i had said i hadn't received any ... then what? how would that have shed any light on my alignment ?

if ya said 'no' without issue, ya would have been more likely to be town.
if ya said 'yes' ya confirmed scum for lying.
come on now. this is not rocket science.

5. if that reaction test convinced him i'm scum, why is he voting for dunn, exactly? you know, the same person i've been actively canvassing votes for this phase?

this is admittedly weird.

Saudade · Post Post #1423 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 4:59 am

Ya fokin monkey mqte
Ya ya

tictac · Post Post #1424 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:00 am

In post 1416, Skellen wrote:tictac, who are you scumreading? So far for D2 I saw you sheeping FL infamous last words about Una (where you are null), sheeping skitter on to Dunn (I think I remember though you wouldn't fight his lynch on D1) and now you followed Garmr to skitter due to skitter's reaction to Garmr's gambit. Can't really tell by this trajectory where you sincerely are.

i currently scumread skitter, tho i didn't before that reaction.
probs means saud is scum as well.
i'm 'eh' about dunn.