Big Four Mafia! Game Over!

Titus · Post Post #3475 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:42 am

In post 3469, jjh927 wrote:immunity to kill by any form including lynch is deathproof

He played consistently with it though. You didn't.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #3476 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:45 am

In post 3475, Titus wrote:
In post 3469, jjh927 wrote:immunity to kill by any form including lynch is deathproof
He played consistently with it though. You didn't.

I’ve already had my role verified when I claimed my result on Pisskop. Drew could claim any role that got vanilaized.

jjh927 · Post Post #3477 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:45 am

In post 3475, Titus wrote:
In post 3469, jjh927 wrote:immunity to kill by any form including lynch is deathproof
He played consistently with it though. You didn't.

?

Titus · Post Post #3478 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:46 am

In post 3476, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 3475, Titus wrote:
In post 3469, jjh927 wrote:immunity to kill by any form including lynch is deathproof
He played consistently with it though. You didn't.
I’ve already had my role verified when I claimed my result on Pisskop. Drew could claim any role that got vanilaized.

No. Your role wasn't verified with your result at all. It was easy to fake.

Drew could claim any role, but he's consistent. You weren't.

chennisden · Post Post #3479 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:47 am

Titus you are confbiasing pretty badly

jjh927 · Post Post #3480 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:47 am

If you're questioning my claim I did kinda crumb

In post 2400, jjh927 wrote:I mean I could probably claim without much, if any, negative game impact

but it is one of those roles I like to wait on so I can tell scum to eat shit later

jjh927 · Post Post #3481 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:48 am

but I think you thought 3469 was made by Alch for some reason

Titus · Post Post #3482 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:49 am

In post 3479, chennisden wrote:Titus you are confbiasing pretty badly

No. I'm not. I listened to the arguments and responded to them.

I am pretty sure that Drew was actually vanillaized.

Why did you want to lynch Creature over deciding the truth of the guilty?

Alchemist21 · Post Post #3483 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:49 am

In post 3478, Titus wrote:
In post 3476, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 3475, Titus wrote:
In post 3469, jjh927 wrote:immunity to kill by any form including lynch is deathproof
He played consistently with it though. You didn't.
I’ve already had my role verified when I claimed my result on Pisskop. Drew could claim any role that got vanilaized.
No. Your role wasn't verified with your result at all. It was easy to fake.

Drew could claim any role, but he's consistent. You weren't.

I knew Pisskop had a PT coming into D2. How is that not verified?

Titus · Post Post #3484 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:51 am

@Chenn, The last two votes needed to lynch scum are one of you and Creature and one of jjh, yoda and gobble.

chennisden · Post Post #3485 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:52 am

In post 3482, Titus wrote:
In post 3479, chennisden wrote:Titus you are confbiasing pretty badly
No. I'm not. I listened to the arguments and responded to them.

I am pretty sure that Drew was actually vanillaized.

Why did you want to lynch Creature over deciding the truth of the guilty?

Because the guilty can self resolve

Titus · Post Post #3486 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:53 am

In post 3483, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 3478, Titus wrote:
In post 3476, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 3475, Titus wrote:
In post 3469, jjh927 wrote:immunity to kill by any form including lynch is deathproof
He played consistently with it though. You didn't.
I’ve already had my role verified when I claimed my result on Pisskop. Drew could claim any role that got vanilaized.
No. Your role wasn't verified with your result at all. It was easy to fake.

Drew could claim any role, but he's consistent. You weren't.
I knew Pisskop had a PT coming into D2. How is that not verified?

I had already claimed the mod confirmation of pisskop. It could be guessed we were masons.

That's speculation but the fact is you knowing pisskop had a PT or not is a sideshow. It doesn't prove PT or Traffic Analyst.

Titus · Post Post #3487 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:54 am

In post 3485, chennisden wrote:
In post 3482, Titus wrote:
In post 3479, chennisden wrote:Titus you are confbiasing pretty badly
No. I'm not. I listened to the arguments and responded to them.

I am pretty sure that Drew was actually vanillaized.

Why did you want to lynch Creature over deciding the truth of the guilty?
Because the guilty can self resolve

So can Creature.

That doesn't tell me anything.

gobbledygook · Post Post #3488 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:57 am

I don’t think I’ve ever had less grasp on a game than I do with this one.

Titus · Post Post #3489 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:58 am

Fmpov the guilty has resolved. Why would scum let the PT cop alive?

Titus · Post Post #3490 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:58 am

And be useful

gobbledygook · Post Post #3491 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 5:59 am

VOTE: Alchemist

gobbledygook · Post Post #3492 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:00 am

I am washing my feathers of this. Titus has convinced me.

Titus · Post Post #3493 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:00 am

L minus 1

Titus · Post Post #3494 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:01 am

If I am wrong, I'll live with it.

gobbledygook · Post Post #3495 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:01 am

JJH’s Chennisden vote is really weird too.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #3496 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:02 am

In post 3486, Titus wrote:That's speculation but the fact is you knowing pisskop had a PT or not is a sideshow. It doesn't prove PT or Traffic Analyst.

So you think I just claimed a guilty on D2 as scum because lol?

gobbledygook · Post Post #3497 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:02 am

In post 3496, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 3486, Titus wrote:That's speculation but the fact is you knowing pisskop had a PT or not is a sideshow. It doesn't prove PT or Traffic Analyst.
So you think I just claimed a guilty on D2 as scum because lol?

This is all just WIFOM dude.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #3498 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:03 am

In post 3497, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 3496, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 3486, Titus wrote:That's speculation but the fact is you knowing pisskop had a PT or not is a sideshow. It doesn't prove PT or Traffic Analyst.
So you think I just claimed a guilty on D2 as scum because lol?
This is all just WIFOM dude.

You can’t just dismiss everything as wifom and not consider it.

You’re probably scum anyway so whatever.

jjh927 · Post Post #3499 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2019 6:04 am

I've been refreshing a lot because what I want to say keeps changing