Mini Normal 2113 | Menalque & Co’s Favourite Places | OVER

rb · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:11 pm

bob man good yes

profii · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:52 pm

In post 323, rb wrote:I dont like kerset still

but i think this is in their likely town range and that they are less likely to be scum than PP/frank at the very least

ill take a PP lynch over anything else at current

why do you think that about kerset

Frank · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Thu Dec 26, 2019 11:53 pm

I'm gonna re read in the next 20 hours. I really don't like my reads rn even though I've been reading pretty thoroughly but idk.

Is there anything someone wants me to pay special attention to or attempt take a stance on when I do so?

Looker · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:11 am

In post 325, rb wrote:bob man good yes

What is this a reference to? I've seen it mentioned in many games.

In post 327, Frank wrote:I'm gonna re read in the next 20 hours. I really don't like my reads rn even though I've been reading pretty thoroughly but idk.

Is there anything someone wants me to pay special attention to or attempt take a stance on when I do so?

What's your assessment of the players on your wagon? Also, what's your proposed strategy for lurkers?

rb · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:48 am

bob man good is a pun on orange man bad

rb · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 12:49 am

In post 326, profii wrote:
In post 323, rb wrote:I dont like kerset still

but i think this is in their likely town range and that they are less likely to be scum than PP/frank at the very least

ill take a PP lynch over anything else at current
why do you think that about kerset

idk i just do

Kerset · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:15 am

In post 312, skitter30 wrote:
In post 302, Kerset wrote:
Skitter managed to make his own viewpoint.
He should be town but inaccurate one.
With non conformist pops, they make TvT couple.
? are you talking about me? i don't know what this means

You created your own point of view. You didn't copy anyone, it was original.

Looker · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:22 am

Hilarious

Kerset · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:29 am

In post 305, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 303, Kerset wrote:With just Nona and profi you are out of relationship scheme.
What does this mean?

It would be cool to see everyone reaction to relevant topics. It will be important, when we kill a scum later. I allows us to find scum agenda.

profii · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:34 am

In post 333, Kerset wrote:
In post 305, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 303, Kerset wrote:With just Nona and profi you are out of relationship scheme.
What does this mean?
It would be cool to see everyone reaction to relevant topics. It will be important, when we kill a scum later. I allows us to find scum agenda.

I ignore things when I have no idea what it means. If I was supposed to react I couldn't make any sense of what that meant.

Kerset · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:42 am

In post 320, profii wrote: Kerset - I want to hear more about why you went out of your way to trigger bob??

Because i saw a pattern. It was the most abnormal thing around there so it was worth analyzing. Aside of pops&skitter conversation, was there anything interesting? Rb had the highest amount of votes but they were all from rvs. It is quite sad that no one beside me recognize this pattern.

BTW You are a coward. Its cool that you make a readlist and keep activity but you didn't push anyone. We won't get anywhere in this game with gentle suggestions.

Kerset · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:45 am

In post 334, profii wrote:
In post 333, Kerset wrote:
In post 305, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 303, Kerset wrote:With just Nona and profi you are out of relationship scheme.
What does this mean?
It would be cool to see everyone reaction to relevant topics. It will be important, when we kill a scum later. I allows us to find scum agenda.
I ignore things when I have no idea what it means. If I was supposed to react I couldn't make any sense of what that meant.

Sorry i will try to improve

Kerset · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:49 am

Rb how do you feel about gobble?

bob3141 · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 2:09 am

In post 331, Kerset wrote:
In post 312, skitter30 wrote:
In post 302, Kerset wrote:
Skitter managed to make his own viewpoint.
He should be town but inaccurate one.
With non conformist pops, they make TvT couple.
? are you talking about me? i don't know what this means
You created your own point of view. You didn't copy anyone, it was original.

ok so his view point was original but what did you think of his view itself. You say you think she is town but wrong. What about her view makes you think she is town and what about it dont you agree with

bob3141 · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 2:12 am

Also im assuming that your saying skitter vs pops is tvt. What makes you think this. Is it simply because you are town reading both or is there also something in their interactions that comes across as being mutually exclusive with one of them being scum

bob3141 · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 2:15 am

Also im assuming that your saying skitter vs pops is tvt but makes you think this. Is it simply because you are town reading both of them or is there also something in their interactions. That feels like its mutually exclusive with one of them being scum.

rewrote last posts as I didnt proof read it.

PenguinPower · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 2:30 am

In post 311, PenguinPower wrote:How many games have you played with me, Bob?

In post 317, gobbledygook wrote:
In post 309, PenguinPower wrote:Um...that is very much not true most of the time.
I agree with Bob’s assessment of your general playstyle.

So, 2106 just ended which is why Bob’s comment surprised me, but maybe I’m just viewing my play differently since it comes from my perspective. It’s also the reason why I’m not going to give Bob an easy town read for his play so far as he seems to be able to emulate his town game as scum pretty well.

Kerset · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:15 am

In post 338, bob3141 wrote:
In post 331, Kerset wrote:
In post 312, skitter30 wrote:
In post 302, Kerset wrote:
Skitter managed to make his own viewpoint.
He should be town but inaccurate one.
With non conformist pops, they make TvT couple.
? are you talking about me? i don't know what this means
You created your own point of view. You didn't copy anyone, it was original.

ok so his view point was original but what did you think of his view itself. You say you think she is town but wrong. What about her view makes you think she is town and what about it dont you agree with

Her view itself seems genuine enough. You are trying to imply that that "things that i don't agree with" and "things that makes me think she is town" are two separate things. I don't agree with her read but i can still see that it came from independent townie mind. I can see that she didn't intent to confuse people.

Kerset · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 3:19 am

In post 340, bob3141 wrote:Also im assuming that your saying skitter vs pops is tvt but makes you think this. Is it simply because you are town reading both of them or is there also something in their interactions. That feels like its mutually exclusive with one of them being scum.

rewrote last posts as I didnt proof read it.

Do you think that pops is scum, because skitter is town?

skitter30 · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:15 am

I didn't especially like profii's catchup posts

skitter30 · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:15 am

In post 331, Kerset wrote:
In post 312, skitter30 wrote:
In post 302, Kerset wrote:
Skitter managed to make his own viewpoint.
He should be town but inaccurate one.
With non conformist pops, they make TvT couple.
? are you talking about me? i don't know what this means
You created your own point of view. You didn't copy anyone, it was original.

With regards to what, exactly?

skitter30 · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:19 am

VOTE: frank

Kerset · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:29 am

In post 345, skitter30 wrote:
In post 331, Kerset wrote:
In post 312, skitter30 wrote:
In post 302, Kerset wrote:
Skitter managed to make his own viewpoint.
He should be town but inaccurate one.
With non conformist pops, they make TvT couple.
? are you talking about me? i don't know what this means
You created your own point of view. You didn't copy anyone, it was original.
With regards to what, exactly?

from #174 to #246

bob3141 · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:51 am

In post 343, Kerset wrote:
In post 340, bob3141 wrote:Also im assuming that your saying skitter vs pops is tvt but makes you think this. Is it simply because you are town reading both of them or is there also something in their interactions. That feels like its mutually exclusive with one of them being scum.

rewrote last posts as I didnt proof read it.
Do you think that pops is scum, because skitter is town?

I see kerset you dont want to answer that question. Again what makes you think it is TvT.

Its very easy for scum to say somethign like that as scum know who is town and who is scum. So explain why you think skitter and pops is tvt.

You havnt said you think pops and skitter are town. You specifically said tvt. Thus you are claiming to see something in their interacts that makes them both as town. What is that you claim to have seen.

bob3141 · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:57 am

In post 342, Kerset wrote:
In post 338, bob3141 wrote:
In post 331, Kerset wrote:
In post 312, skitter30 wrote:
In post 302, Kerset wrote:
Skitter managed to make his own viewpoint.
He should be town but inaccurate one.
With non conformist pops, they make TvT couple.
? are you talking about me? i don't know what this means
You created your own point of view. You didn't copy anyone, it was original.

ok so his view point was original but what did you think of his view itself. You say you think she is town but wrong. What about her view makes you think she is town and what about it dont you agree with
Her view itself seems genuine enough. You are trying to imply that that "things that i don't agree with" and "things that makes me think she is town" are two separate things. I don't agree with her read but i can still see that it came from independent townie mind. I can see that she didn't intent to confuse people.

You have not answered my question. You just used more words to say what you said before

What about skitter that makes you think its genuine and what about that makes you think she is town.

You say you dont agree with her but on what and why?

What makes you think it came from idependent town?

And to be clear im asking you expalin your reads and how you came to them. As it stands your just looking like scum to me. As you say things but neither back them nor go into any detail. If skitter is town its very easy for scum you to say she is town but harder for you to come up with a reasoning that looks organic.