Large Normal 225 | Creature Writes Shitty Flavor - Game over


User avatar
Dolly Parton
Dolly Parton
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Dolly Parton
Goon
Goon
Posts: 786
Joined: November 26, 2019
Location: Dollywood

Post Post #1625 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:45 am

Post by Dolly Parton »

In post 1624, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1621, Dolly Parton wrote:
In post 1619, Wake1 wrote: Gun to head, which two do you think it could be?
Dunn 1st then Elsa. But I think a dunn red flip makes elsa go red as well.
Off the wagons?

(Just pointing out I was asking Rabid.)
Oh nvm then. I didn't pay attention that Rabid's quote was what you were referring too.
"It's hard to be a diamond in a rhinestone world."
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
Goodfellas
Posts: 40513
Joined: April 2, 2016
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #1626 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:46 am

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 1623, Dolly Parton wrote:
In post 1622, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1620, Dolly Parton wrote:I know what a jailkeeper does, I just though it basically made the target ascetic as well as protecting from NKs and roleblocking.
Yeah. And that's the role Elsa is claiming, but there's no reason for you to have thought that this game. And I'm saying maybe she talked about her fake claim ahead of time in the mafia pt. That's why it's suspicious.
So basically you are saying that me and elsa are scum together?
That's the assumption, yes. OR FRANK instead of you.

With that said, if frank says that he hasn't received my message, that either means that Elsa is likely town (because they used their role on me when it wouldn't make sense to as scum), or that they're both scum and frank is covering for him
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1627 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:46 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

In post 1619, Wake1 wrote:Gun to head, which two do you think it could be?
If you're referring to those off the wagons (Dunn, Wake Zote) I'd look to Zote first, then Dunn. Really at this point I'd look at Zote only. Dunn's been cleared by LUV (not saying I believe that 100% but it would be a bold move if both are scum), and I'm town reading you due to claim and today's play.
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1628 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:49 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

In post 1622, Dunnstral wrote:Yeah. And that's the role Elsa is claiming, but there's no reason for you to have thought that this game. And I'm saying maybe she talked about her fake claim ahead of time in the mafia pt. That's why it's suspicious.
FWIW, I've made that mistake regarding JKs years on site. I regularly have to look it up on the wiki.
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1629 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:50 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1627, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:
In post 1619, Wake1 wrote:Gun to head, which two do you think it could be?
If you're referring to those off the wagons (Dunn, Wake Zote) I'd look to Zote first, then Dunn. Really at this point I'd look at Zote only. Dunn's been cleared by LUV (not saying I believe that 100% but it would be a bold move if both are scum), and I'm town reading you due to claim and today's play.
Huh.

Want to vote him?

I'm not comfortable with his current activity level. Same with Nero and a couple others Day 3.
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
Goodfellas
Posts: 40513
Joined: April 2, 2016
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #1630 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:50 am

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 1629, Wake1 wrote:I'm not comfortable with his current activity level.
:roll:
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1631 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:54 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1630, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1629, Wake1 wrote:I'm not comfortable with his current activity level.
:roll:
Did you read what he said D3?
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
Goodfellas
Posts: 40513
Joined: April 2, 2016
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #1632 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:56 am

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 1527, Zote the Mighty wrote:I want you and that Elsa fool to claim your results. I have nothing to add otherwise.
In post 1530, Zote the Mighty wrote:Then I want Wake to claim his target
I happen to agree with him, though.
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1633 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:58 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1632, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1527, Zote the Mighty wrote:I want you and that Elsa fool to claim your results. I have nothing to add otherwise.
In post 1530, Zote the Mighty wrote:Then I want Wake to claim his target
I happen to agree with him, though.
He should be having more to add. Same with Nero and a couple others.

That's the point.
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
Goodfellas
Posts: 40513
Joined: April 2, 2016
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #1634 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 1:59 am

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 1602, Dolly Parton wrote:
Doesn't a JK essentially make the target ascetic and immune to kills for the night?
It doesn't look like you thought jk roleblocked here, but you added that part later:
In post 1620, Dolly Parton wrote:I know what a jailkeeper does, I just though it basically made the target ascetic as well as protecting from NKs and roleblocking.
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1635 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:16 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

VOTE: Nero
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1636 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:21 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1635, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:VOTE: Nero
In post 1627, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:
In post 1619, Wake1 wrote:Gun to head, which two do you think it could be?
If you're referring to those off the wagons (Dunn, Wake Zote) I'd look to Zote first, then Dunn. Really at this point I'd look at Zote only. Dunn's been cleared by LUV (not saying I believe that 100% but it would be a bold move if both are scum), and I'm town reading you due to claim and today's play.
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1637 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:25 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

Yeah I realized that after I walked away.
VOTE: Zote
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1638 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:26 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

Zote also gives off the vibe, with all the fool stuff, that he's acting abrasive because he thinks scum wouldn't do that.
User avatar
Dunnstral
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
User avatar
User avatar
Dunnstral
he/him
Goodfellas
Goodfellas
Posts: 40513
Joined: April 2, 2016
Pronoun: he/him

Post Post #1639 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:27 am

Post by Dunnstral »

In post 2261, Dunnstral wrote:Jailkeeper. Roleblocks. Town. Investigatives.
Same game with Dolly
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1640 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:22 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

Spoiler:
In post 848, Zote the Mighty wrote:I might be willing to consolidate on Rabid but I honestly don't think he's scummy
In post 1126, Zote the Mighty wrote:
In post 1113, Espressojet wrote:
In post 1109, MariaR wrote:
In post 1106, Flavor Leaf wrote:I actually like that case on Maria and see it coming from town, but i may be just glossing over it. Regardless, I think espresso’s town
It's not even a 'case' more so as baseless statements that don't add up to much. So tell me what you like about it?
I think it adds up to the fact that you've contributed
zero town behavior
this entire game
That's sadly not unusual if the one game I've played with her is anything to go off of. In all honesty Maria is most likely town.
In post 1127, Zote the Mighty wrote:
In post 1118, Frank wrote:I don't think it's more likely for someone saying they want to vote someone "for now" to come from scum than it is from town.
Unless Rabid is considering it a scumslip, in which case I still don't see it.
I think Rabid's point is that saying 'i'm gonna vote them for a little bit' implies that you know you're gonna switch your vote whereas saying i'm voting them 'for now' means your vote could move or stay on them.

I don't necessarily think it's scum indicative but it does raise my eyebrows a little bit.
In post 1351, Zote the Mighty wrote:
In post 1349, Flavor Leaf wrote:Zote, if you’re town, you know I NEVER claim VT here, and stick to it from so early.
I think you're town and would rather not lynch you

PEDIT: Join me on voting Dolly then

UNVOTE:
Several notable town reads given on people who were becoming lynchable. This doesn't look like scum.
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1641 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:31 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

In post 1507, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:
In post 1502, Elsa Jay wrote:I'm waiting for our "investigative" to get a result. Either or at this point.
I targeted Espresso. He’s town.
Are these standard cop investigations or something else?
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1642 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:32 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1640, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 848, Zote the Mighty wrote:I might be willing to consolidate on Rabid but I honestly don't think he's scummy
In post 1126, Zote the Mighty wrote:
In post 1113, Espressojet wrote:
In post 1109, MariaR wrote:
In post 1106, Flavor Leaf wrote:I actually like that case on Maria and see it coming from town, but i may be just glossing over it. Regardless, I think espresso’s town
It's not even a 'case' more so as baseless statements that don't add up to much. So tell me what you like about it?
I think it adds up to the fact that you've contributed
zero town behavior
this entire game
That's sadly not unusual if the one game I've played with her is anything to go off of. In all honesty Maria is most likely town.
In post 1127, Zote the Mighty wrote:
In post 1118, Frank wrote:I don't think it's more likely for someone saying they want to vote someone "for now" to come from scum than it is from town.
Unless Rabid is considering it a scumslip, in which case I still don't see it.
I think Rabid's point is that saying 'i'm gonna vote them for a little bit' implies that you know you're gonna switch your vote whereas saying i'm voting them 'for now' means your vote could move or stay on them.

I don't necessarily think it's scum indicative but it does raise my eyebrows a little bit.
In post 1351, Zote the Mighty wrote:
In post 1349, Flavor Leaf wrote:Zote, if you’re town, you know I NEVER claim VT here, and stick to it from so early.
I think you're town and would rather not lynch you

PEDIT: Join me on voting Dolly then

UNVOTE:
Several notable town reads given on people who were becoming lynchable. This doesn't look like scum.
You're not interested in voting him today?
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1643 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:37 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

Not at this point.
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1644 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:39 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1643, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Not at this point.
...how about at least to pressure?
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1645 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 3:47 am

Post by Wake1 »

Dunnstral, what out of Elsa, Dolly, and Rabid...

Which ones get lynched today, and which ones would you refuse to vote for?
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Rabid Schnauzer
Goon
Goon
Posts: 592
Joined: October 30, 2019

Post Post #1646 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:21 am

Post by Rabid Schnauzer »

In post 1644, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1643, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Not at this point.
...how about at least to pressure?
It doesn't pressure when they know you're only doing it for pressure. Plus, there are other suspects.
User avatar
Wake1
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Wake1
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 8684
Joined: August 3, 2013

Post Post #1647 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:21 am

Post by Wake1 »

In post 1646, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:
In post 1644, Wake1 wrote:
In post 1643, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Not at this point.
...how about at least to pressure?
It doesn't pressure when they know you're only doing it for pressure. Plus, there are other suspects.
OK.
"It's wise to be... cautious... with Wake."
— House*
"What Wake lacks in charisma, he makes up for it in pure analytic power."
— Nosferatu*
User avatar
Lil Uzi Vert
Lil Uzi Vert
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Lil Uzi Vert
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16278
Joined: August 9, 2016

Post Post #1648 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:26 am

Post by Lil Uzi Vert »

I’m a Neapolitan.
User avatar
Lil Uzi Vert
Lil Uzi Vert
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Lil Uzi Vert
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 16278
Joined: August 9, 2016

Post Post #1649 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:26 am

Post by Lil Uzi Vert »

Am I the only one that gut town read rb’s play before replacing out?

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”