I'm probably okay with sorting out Fish tomorrow. Best case scenario we hit scum, worst case scenario we've eliminated an anti-town player and got some info out of it. That's L-2 btw.
I feel like your reads list isnt backed up, your reads are vapid, and I know youre wrong about me so I have to take the rest of your reads with a grain of salt.
I felt like the non wagon was tainted and wasnt ready to hammer it, but now im wondering if Non was daring me to.
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
okay the active game i was talking about (1975) is done now, so i can give a better reason! yay!
non imh seems to try to be more helpful as scum (as in trying to be tred more)
In post 406, GayBabyJailor wrote:okay the active game i was talking about (1975) is done now, so i can give a better reason! yay!
non imh seems to try to be more helpful as scum (as in trying to be tred more)
As in you feel they were trying to be town read in that game and feel he's playing different here?
Had a quick skim of his ISO in Newbie 1975 and he seemed to start acting erratic after a couple of votes were put on him, and after that the mason claim followed, pretty much the same as this game.
@Egix - you were in that game, and you've been voting Non here, you thinking it's pretty much the scum game from Non?
I mean, if Non is legit claiming mason than either he or Jstr need to die today and I'm not hanging a claimed tracker over an unverified mason claim from a sketchy at dude.
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
In post 411, Formerfish wrote:I mean, if Non is legit claiming mason than either he or Jstr need to die today and I'm not hanging a claimed tracker over an unverified mason claim from a sketchy at dude.
Ya, pretty much this
Given that he just claimed mason in a game that he flipped scum in, I'm pretty happy with his lynch today unless a mason partner wants to come in and confirm him
I dunno if they are still being kept up, but I know at one point there was a higher than rand chance of a newbie being scum if they replaced out of a newbie game. I think the number went higher the earlier it happened and the less the people spoke.
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
"FF, you're a dick, but you don't hit below the belt. So you're a dick about finding scum, not hurting the people who are playing the game. That's acceptable dickary." MaryJoLisa
I didn't create it, you lot did.
Y'all really think they didn't notice?
Nah, they're just letting you have your fun.
You shouldn't underestimate SE's, ever.
