BooneyToonz XIII: To Boon or Not To Boon - [END]

[Doctor Drew]

Spoiler:

You wanna actually play the game?

[chkflip]

Okay, Titus.

Titus, okay.

Okay, Titus.

Show me where the "off-wagon" scum are. Go ahead.

Act 1, Scene 6

Emperor flippyNips [6]:

Creature, 50 Judge Powers, Davesaz, BrightEyedFish, Frank, Latias and Latios

Haggle [5]:

Titus, Amrun, AaronFrost, Doctor Drew, RCEnigma

Romeo and Juliet [5]:

Chara, Espressojet, Haggle, Venus and Mars, chkflip

Joan of Arc [1]:

Bambi Jay,

Frank [1]:

Romeo and Juliet

Chkflip [1]:

Joan of Arc

Not Voting [2]:

Clemency, Emperor flippyNips,

With

21

alive, it takes

11

to execute.

Act 1 ends (expired on 2020-01-11 19:00:00) on

January 11th

.

Mod Notes:

Don’t be outta pocket.

Joan of Arc was prodded.

Because as far as I can tell? Most of the playerbase is "off wagon," Titus.

But let's magic pretend you meant this one:

Act 1, Scene 8

Romeo and Juliet [11]:

Chara, Espressojet, Haggle, Venus and Mars, Amrun, davesaz, AaronFrost, BrightEyedFish, Titus, RCEnigma, Bambi Jay ——— [EXECUTED]

Emperor flippyNips [4]:

Creature, 50 Judge Powers, Frank, Latias and Latios,

Haggle [3]:

Doctor Drew, RCEnigma, Romeo and Juliet

Chkflip [1]:

Joan of Arc

Not Voting [2]:

Clemency, Emperor flippyNips, Chkflip

With

21

alive, it takes

11

to execute.

Act 1 ends (expired on 2020-01-11 19:00:00) on

January 11th

.

Mod Notes:

Don’t be outta pocket.

Latias and Latios were prodded.

Nine names off wagon here, Titus.

Who's scum?

[RCEnigma]

Drew are you scumreading Titus or not?

[Venus and Mars]

Drew are you scumreading Titus or not?

Did she make any suspicious typos invoking allegiance to the illuminati, Satanic nursery rhymes or Nickleback? If not, I’d say probably not.

[chkflip]

Chk, what makes more sense to you?

Almost randomly getting targeted by a mystery town enchantress that fucked with Creature and Titus?

Or Aaron claiming Doctor Enabler because we had a dead cop enabler and a claimed doctor?

I don't think anyone targeting 50 could be deemed random when we spent a decent portion of the day talking about his role; however, I will say that if you take a look at the available roles list you won't find "enabler" anywhere on it.

ThAt'Ll SoRt ItSeLf OuT

People ITT want to talk about "this is why towns are losing" etc like no bitch towns are losing because you'd rather follow dogshit logic and let the rest work itself out. You go full horse blinders on the first thing that makes sense to you and go broken record when you're questioned about it.

[chkflip]

Oops I pulled a Titus and didn't answer your question at all. I do, unfortunately, have to ask this before I can answer. What do you mean by "makes more sense"? Like, in general as in which is more likely?

[BrightEyedFish]

so we've gone from mech talk to auto correct talk. This game is fascinating.

[BrightEyedFish]

Aww screw it, I guess I have to do this now just to get "involved"

DAYVIG: davesaz

[BrightEyedFish]

my ability ends the day too, so do your twilight stuff

[chkflip]

Why dave?

[BrightEyedFish]

Why dave?

A random null to me.

[chkflip]

He claimed knifesmith, you're aware?

[BrightEyedFish]

Oops.

[chkflip]

This is getting to the point where I just want to replace out, like, nobody fucking cares anymore.

[50 Judge Powers]

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D2 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D1 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So, one of you or Creature had to have been targeted because he track on you failed but he didn’t claim anything on D1 but you did, so between the two of you, who was the most likely target? So yes, this definitely does point to the existence of an enchantress, which nullifies any NA executed on you or by you, so the clear on Nips is meaningless.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

If somebody cares to validate this against the endless walls of back & forth between Nancy & Titus that's be cool.

[50 Judge Powers]

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D2 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D1 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So, one of you or Creature had to have been targeted because he track on you failed but he didn’t claim anything on D1 but you did, so between the two of you, who was the most likely target? So yes, this definitely does point to the existence of an enchantress, which nullifies any NA executed on you or by you, so the clear on Nips is meaningless.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

If somebody cares to validate this against the endless walls of back & forth between Nancy & Titus that's be cool.

I am also not moving my vote

[50 Judge Powers]

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D2 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D1 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So, one of you or Creature had to have been targeted because he track on you failed but he didn’t claim anything on D1 but you did, so between the two of you, who was the most likely target? So yes, this definitely does point to the existence of an enchantress, which nullifies any NA executed on you or by you, so the clear on Nips is meaningless.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

If somebody cares to validate this against the endless walls of back & forth between Nancy & Titus that's be cool.

I am also not moving my vote

Nor am I

[50 Judge Powers]

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D2 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

I'm stopping at the top of page 150, Internet to slow and I'm really tired. Will catch up tomorrow.

Also,

@Boon: Man your games are awesome, but you can't have Joan, Creature and Nips all in the same game and expect is to enjoy the game, can you??

P-edit: @VnM: You yourself have been arguing against the existence of an Enchantress to begin with. Now make up your mind, was I targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'll vote Nips) or was I NOT targeted by an Enchantress (in which case I'm not moving off Joan)??

I was against it until I realized Creature targeted you because if he had targeted Drew, Nips would be clear. Nips is the only one who knows Expresso, so it’s a weird kill and he’s really not doing anything if you reread his ISO.

Also, there were 3 wagons as has already been pointed out by RCE. One on flipped town - R & J, an other on mech cleared town - Haggle (Dave checked that they had no gun) and Nips.

So, not knowing the Creature target was making Titus’ theory implausible but now that I know he targeted you, which makes way more sense than Creature because YOU actually claimed D1 and Creature did not, and since he’s the only one to claim rb, it has to be one of you and Occams Razor says you, which means that no actions either on you or executed by you were possible.

So, one of you or Creature had to have been targeted because he track on you failed but he didn’t claim anything on D1 but you did, so between the two of you, who was the most likely target? So yes, this definitely does point to the existence of an enchantress, which nullifies any NA executed on you or by you, so the clear on Nips is meaningless.

So yeah, the enchantress theory makes total sense now.

If somebody cares to validate this against the endless walls of back & forth between Nancy & Titus that's be cool.

I am also not moving my vote

Nor am I

Not I, either

[50 Judge Powers]

Still nope.

Stop doing short comments with no quotes. AP is too stupid to recognize you are responding to the post directly above yours. Please quote the whole conversation since Titus first mentioned the Enchantress and add your 2-words comment.

P.S. If you forget to add your comment, then requote your own quote and add the 2-words comment.

[Haggle]

VOTE: Venus and Mars

If I assume she made the errors on purpose, what is scum indicative about that? Because that seems like a leap. I almost flipped out at you for pointing out what may have been a crumb. I'm really not seeing scum indications from that.

BP

[Nancy Drew 39]

so we've gone from mech talk to auto correct talk. This game is fascinating.

We have the scumhunting God Drew in it, ‘nuff said.

[Haggle]

eople ont eally hink hat ropping he irst etter f ords s cummy

I hate that I spent like a minute trying to read this.

BP

[Nancy Drew 39]

Aww screw it, I guess I have to do this now just to get "involved"

DAYVIG: davesaz

Is this real?

[Nancy Drew 39]

my ability ends the day too, so do your twilight stuff

Omg BEF, what did you just do?

[50 Judge Powers]

50 needs to make a Goddamn appearance so we know who our 4 off-the-table townies are.

As far as I'm quote up (this post I'm quoting) Nip isn't cleared. I get the feeling I was targeted by an Alien (a combination of Jailkeeper & Rolestopper for those who don't know what an Alien is) and this would be the simplest explanation for why TWO players actions failed on me (assuming Creature is telling the truth). If that's the case, then I was recharged because my action didn't go through due to the JK, and not because my target was not group scum.

~The brainy one.

Creature’s ability on you failed because thanks to Expresso death, all cop-like actions fail.

You still think this to be true?