i mean, i could be wrong. I don't think I am tho.
In post 514, Gamma Emerald wrote:Lol at that tiktok wall
And like, you make a bit of a show of asking why I vote you and respond to none of the actual reasoning, looks like you just want to doubtcast my vote
kinda hard to respond to reasoning when I don't know what that reasoning is.
@jan, skitt does this post look familiar to ya? lol.
ping. this kinda makes me think both skitt and leaf are town, but predicated on saud-scum, so day 1 association.
ok
i don't see it at all. why?
comes with lying a lot, i suppose.
In post 530, Saudade wrote:if only your reads were that good when you lost that game to scum me ; (
like this kinda superior amusement, like he's constantly laughing at everyone makes my skin crawl, and i think comes from informed perspective.
reported. can we avoid icky sexual imagery plz?
this is kinda partnery post i think. i would hope that ya wold not say that to a townie as scum.
In post 537, Saudade wrote:can we put some votes on mariar i want her to squirm and dance for a bit
and this attempt to divert into mariar when leaf under pressure also partnery.
i don't think garm askin about PRs is particulalry indicative
ref
as far as i can tell, leaf was 'timing', gamma was 'walls' and the rest were 'eh, might as well'
could be.
tbh kinda having vork-flashbacks here.
In post 563, Saudade wrote:I guess we can lynch FL for the silly claim and trying to discredit our princess skitty
yea, ha, ha, ha, ick.
In post 567, Flavor Leaf wrote:Honestly, people try to read me early for some reason, but anytime I’m the first scum dead I always win.
Which is why I know anyone who pushes me early just can’t read me or is scum.
My town game is so blatantly obvious like it is here, but people are just scared of the All Mighty Leaf
ewww X 100
expand?
it's not like sensible play as either align.
i could see leaf doing it as both.
In post 587, Non lmh wrote:not that kind to replace out on my own, but will comply if you or the mod ask it of me
asking folks to replace is against sitewide rules now, which is I think a very good thing. only do it if you want to, and don't talk about it pls.
disloyal:causes the role to behave as though it were roleblocked unless the target has a different alignment than the user.
announcing: When acting, whatever player you target will be informed that your role targeted them. For instance, if an announcing doctor targeted player X, player X would receive a message saying "You were targeted by a doctor ability during the night".
PT Cop:A PT Cop checks whether a player has access to a private topic. Unlike the Traffic Analyst, this will get "has access" results even on players who are in a private topic by themselves, but will give a "no access" result on a Mailman (who has the ability to privately communicate, but without the use of a private topic).
I do not believe this abomination of a role exists in a setup designed by northsidegal.
it's functionally identical to disloyal cop, except the announcing-part, which the scum would be informed about about anyway when a guilty was claimed on them, it's way too complicated for no mechanical effect, and entirely made up by you.
In post 593, january wrote:tictac * last game I played w/ him he was supertown so I might be comparing
yea, u are comparing apples and oranges, but I get it.
i mean, not that hard to guess that I was gonna.
In post 599, january wrote:but i felt like this game he cornered himself into claiming so he planned it before the game even started
meh, i don't think that is necessarily the case, but maybe it is. i don't think he is more likely to do that as town.
In post 608, Flavor Leaf wrote:I still get a result from targeting, so this isn’t useless still. Scum will just also know I have a result on them.
I get guilties on possible traitors as well because they’re not in a PT, bar neighbor, but they would still give me a “not in a PT” result, which is a guilty with disloyal.
nope.
disloyal works as if roleblocked if not used on different align.
normal guidelines say no result on a roleblock.
I would think ya would know how your own role works.
In post 664, Skellen wrote:Also that role looks oddly convenient. Why is there even an Announcing modifier for a town PT Cop. Like usually the investigative claims the guilty immediately anyway, so what?
ah, u said this already, I'm redundant, oh well.
In post 681, Saudade wrote:But what if skitter is not trash but really really good and you're both scum???
ech.
tl;dr: saud kinda making me doubt it and I'd rather lynch him, but don't think that's gonna happen today. also day 1 associat, so i think I wanna:
VOTE: Leaf