eddie cane has a message for you:In post 1894, Formerfish wrote:Dann v Espy is not tvt. I see Dann flipping red more often than Espy, at least Espy commited to a read, its a bad one, but a read none the less.
ftfyIn post 1672, Auro wrote:I'm interested in a whole case of Dong rather than individual posts.
I wasnt thinking about it this way, but this makes sense, especially with that comment he made ealier today about voting himself because we are pussies or something.In post 1685, Dunnstral wrote:So yesterday he planned on voting NSG after FF, but today after NSG flips scum he backs off of FF - I think that is for his own survival, and that he is scum
he said his kill list was:In post 1905, Espeonage wrote:The duck has offended me.
Is this whole post from Eddie?In post 1695, Dannflor wrote:A Message from Eddie Cane!
I mean, yeah, but if there is a way to obviously avoid that you think her partners are going to go for that idea on d1? People were very willing to give NSG a pass into d2 even with everything shed done. I could have easily been lynched instead and then who knows.In post 1699, Auro wrote:I mean, if NSG just outright says she's not gonna play the game and you're sure she's getting lynched at some point... Might as well bus, no?In post 1695, Dannflor wrote:He's just going for the deep game pocket on FF while bussing his partner in White Flag? When two scum dead means the end of the game? No.
I’m on phone so not gonna find it but literally I was like “fuck letting nsg lurk punish that”In post 1889, Formerfish wrote:In post 1614, BBmolla wrote:I can't even understand why you're mad unless you're scum, I feel great about howwepunished NSG's shitty play
I feel like you sat on me until it was clear I wasnt going down. Werent you defending NSG early, and most, of day 1?
Can you point to a post of your own where you show half as much conviction in anything youre saying?
My fucking reads list!In post 1911, Formerfish wrote:Can you point to a post of your own where you show half as much conviction in anything youre saying?
That post reads like your TM mates realized that youre a sinking ship that needs its ballast adjusted quickly and the best way they figured to do that was to let one of them try to rehab your slot by putting out a reads list. This way they could workshop it in the tm pt and scum pt over night and would look like you finally sacked up and picked sides on people instead of going where the wind blows.
The post feels more fabricated than softener.
Was it before 1695?In post 1914, Dannflor wrote:Like did you even read my own personal reads list
Ok this might be a better vote count to reference.In post 1300, Dannflor wrote:Formerfish - 5(BBMolla, northsidegal, Dannflor, Espeonage, Dongempire)
northsidegal - 5(Kittymo, Cephrir, Dunnstral, Formerfish, gobbledygook)
gobbledygook - 1(Hopkirk)
Not Voting - 2(Auro, CheekyTeeky)
for reference
Cheeky, Auro, I think you should vote FF
End of day. There was scope for FF or BBM to be lynched instead but they ran out of steam which is when the consolidation on NSG happened. I have gone over how votes on NSG here make sense as scum, but there is also the point that there was scope to be stubborn without too much repercussion or just to ignore the thread.In post 1523, T-Bone wrote:
I've shifted you up and shifted BB molla up and made a few other adjustments but that's not the point.In post 1917, Formerfish wrote:Thats 1000 posts ago, you still feel the same about everyone?
Like playing a long con.In post 1707, Dunnstral wrote:Yes, that's kind of my point:In post 1696, Donempire wrote:NSG was talking about surviving to day 2 and starting to play then. If she hadnt kept up on that promise she would have been lynched, regardless of whether or not i "bussed" her.
It makes sense if she's dying day 2 anywayIn post 1696, Donempire wrote:Shading her would have been scum indicative if she flipped town. Makes no sense for me to do as scum, especially in a game where its very easy to lose as scum due to scum having higher numbers but losing at 1 pop
Except once that final swing happened, being stubborn or ignoring the thread likely wasn't going to stop the NSG lynch.In post 1918, Espeonage wrote:End of day. There was scope for FF or BBM to be lynched instead but they ran out of steam which is when the consolidation on NSG happened. I have gone over how votes on NSG here make sense as scum, but there is also the point that there was scope to be stubborn without too much repercussion or just to ignore the thread.
So at this point scum need to make a decision to either bus, or play out for no Lynch or be stubborn and try and force on fish or bbm, a last two hours consolidation on FF was not out of the question.
Using all of this I think that any scum votes on NSG that exist in the final vote count are done with the express notion that they can carry out the game.
This is why I have excluded Gobble, BBM, and Dong from my Lynch pool.
Ok, this is enough. No one beats on my wifey expect me. I mean...
What skin do you have in this particular interaction that you feel you have to play referee between Dong and Cheeky?In post 1722, Dannflor wrote:I think you're both pretty transparently town here and for whatever reason, you guys just can't see it in each other.
You guys clashed over a read (FF) in a pretty hardcore fashion but I think instead of recognizing you just disagreed on a confident read you jumped to the idea that the other person's confidence was scum indicative. I think the fact that a lot of other people in the game and outside the game hard town read you both independently is pretty telling.
