BooneyToonz XIII: To Boon or Not To Boon - [END]

Bambi Jay · Post Post #7800 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:39 pm

In post 7795, 50 Judge Powers wrote:So, it's confirmed. The team that kills on even nights is the one acting on you on odd nights. You figure out who makes you a priority in this players list.

Wasn't there someone who got a modifier n2 though? Someone different.

Haggle · Post Post #7801 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:39 pm

In post 7796, Bambi Jay wrote:3 people have brought up that quote from Joan and all 3 of them gave different reasons for it.

"She's a traitor!" Was ths first one. "Crumbing", said another. And now appearantly scum Joan outs that fact immediately of them being divided?

It's a bit coincidental tbh. You don't see scum being separated like this often.

-Hectic

Titus · Post Post #7802 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:40 pm

In post 7798, Haggle wrote:
In post 7788, 50 Judge Powers wrote:
In post 34, Joan of Arc wrote:One King to find them
One King to divide them
One King to bring them all
And in the darkness bind them

- Macbeth, i, iii
WAIT THE FUCK UP!

VOTE: JOAN

You bloody fools! That crumb is still up there and you dismissed it. Joan is telling you the scum will search for each other to be reunited. They are divided and that "One King" should find them and "bind" them "in the darkness".

JOAN LITERALLY TOLD US THE SCUM WERE DIVDED LONG BEFORE AARON FLIPPED. I BLOODY TOLD YOU AARON JOINED THAT PT TO GET IN TOUCH WITH IS SCUM P.
Oh yeah, isn't Joan just scum here? She's in one of the 2 mafia PTs, and that was to signal to the lost scum (AaronFF), or maybe has something to dow with his they meet the conditions to reunite the PTs.

-Hectic

Joan is not that complex.

Aaron dying is the condition that makes most sense.

Early Aaron could signal, hey X, Y is a bad lynch. Without that scum might bus each other accidentally.

Let's take the consensus scum in Weiss.

Bambi Jay · Post Post #7803 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:40 pm

In post 7799, Titus wrote:
In post 7796, Bambi Jay wrote:3 people have brought up that quote from Joan and all 3 of them gave different reasons for it.

"She's a traitor!" Was ths first one. "Crumbing", said another. And now appearantly scum Joan outs that fact immediately of them being divided?
Who was each?

You think I remember? Honestly it may legit have been Almost who brought it up as a traitor crumb before. Just reusing it.

I'm not rereading day 1 but I do remember people trying to do this before.

50 Judge Powers · Post Post #7804 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:41 pm

Bambi Jay wrote:And now appearantly scum Joan outs that fact immediately of them being divided?

Check OK1. You were in it, GDI! "TWO BY TWO.." = I die on the second day of the second month.

And the very fact you are arguing against this makes you SCUM to me.

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7805 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:41 pm

In post 7802, Titus wrote:Let's take the consensus scum in Weiss.

hmmmmmmmm

50 Judge Powers · Post Post #7806 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:42 pm

@MOD: Replace me

(Also please add me to the spoilered dead thread.. or something.

I've had enough of this!

Joan explicitly scum claims and Titus is still shielding her.

Titus · Post Post #7807 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:43 pm

In post 7806, 50 Judge Powers wrote:
@MOD: Replace me
(Also please add me to the spoilered dead thread.. or something.

I've had enough of this!

Joan explicitly scum claims and Titus is still shielding her.

50, can you stop being a brat because you aren't getting your way?

Bambi Jay · Post Post #7808 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:43 pm

In post 7804, 50 Judge Powers wrote:
Bambi Jay wrote:And now appearantly scum Joan outs that fact immediately of them being divided?
Check OK1. You were in it, GDI! "TWO BY TWO.." = I die on the second day of the second month.

And the very fact you are arguing against this makes you SCUM to me.

That was Elsa, asshat. And that seems like a Flavor thing I dont care about as well.

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7809 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:44 pm

I mean there's a chance Titus is just scum ye?

ascetic also shields her from any remaining disloyal actions that she could be targeted by

Titus · Post Post #7810 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:44 pm

Bambi, can we lynch Weiss?

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7811 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:44 pm

also we can probably just lynch joan through her, strictly speaking her vote is optional not mandatory

not really a great reason to replace

Titus · Post Post #7812 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:44 pm

In post 7809, Weiss Schnee wrote:I mean there's a chance Titus is just scum ye?

ascetic also shields her from any remaining disloyal actions that she could be targeted by

Oh how convenient

Bambi Jay · Post Post #7813 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:45 pm

My vote's already there Titus.

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7814 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:45 pm

In post 7810, Titus wrote:Bambi, can we lynch Weiss?

why are you asking the person already voting me?

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7815 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:45 pm

In post 7812, Titus wrote:Oh how convenient

is it? I'm not voting you, I'm observing there's no reason to presuppose you're town outside of reads

so replacing out because he thinks you're uncooperative town seems ... silly

Titus · Post Post #7816 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:46 pm

In post 7811, Weiss Schnee wrote:also we can probably just lynch joan through her, strictly speaking her vote is optional not mandatory

not really a great reason to replace

That's what townbeard do and you know it. Well unless they're you and mastina in that one game.

Pedit: Because I am drunk.

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7817 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:46 pm

Your defensiveness is noted though

Titus · Post Post #7818 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:47 pm

In post 7815, Weiss Schnee wrote:
In post 7812, Titus wrote:Oh how convenient
is it? I'm not voting you, I'm observing there's no reason to presuppose you're town outside of reads

so replacing out because he thinks you're uncooperative town seems ... silly

It is silly but A50 and RC get bratty when they don't get their way. Never thought I'd see town other than RC do it. Then again if A50 is enchantress welll

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7819 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:47 pm

In post 7816, Titus wrote:
In post 7811, Weiss Schnee wrote:also we can probably just lynch joan through her, strictly speaking her vote is optional not mandatory

not really a great reason to replace
That's what townbeard do and you know it. Well unless they're you and mastina in that one game.

Pedit: Because I am drunk.

what does this even mean

Bambi Jay · Post Post #7820 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:47 pm

Oh damnit more Enchantress shenanigans.

Weiss Schnee · Post Post #7821 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:48 pm

In post 7818, Titus wrote:Then again if A50 is enchantress welll

I don't follow, why would enchantress A50 replace out here and why are you suggesting that?

Titus · Post Post #7822 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:48 pm

In post 7817, Weiss Schnee wrote:Your defensiveness is noted though

Who wouldn't be defensive with scum coming after me for days on end with their night actions?

You on the other hand are scum who widowed Nancy into bombing wrong.

Any reason why you shouldn't be turbo lynched?

Titus · Post Post #7823 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:49 pm

In post 7821, Weiss Schnee wrote:
In post 7818, Titus wrote:Then again if A50 is enchantress welll
I don't follow, why would enchantress A50 replace out here and why are you suggesting that?

I don't know. I am thinking out loud. Sue me.

Then I'll countersue you for being scum.

Titus · Post Post #7824 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:50 pm

In post 7819, Weiss Schnee wrote:
In post 7816, Titus wrote:
In post 7811, Weiss Schnee wrote:also we can probably just lynch joan through her, strictly speaking her vote is optional not mandatory

not really a great reason to replace
That's what townbeard do and you know it. Well unless they're you and mastina in that one game.

Pedit: Because I am drunk.
what does this even mean

Townbeard throw tantrums. That's town who are overconfident and fucking wrong.

Just like you and mastina in Pine v Alisae