![Image](https://gamepedia.cursecdn.com/zelda_gamepedia_en/thumb/2/29/OoT_Link_Artwork.png/257px-OoT_Link_Artwork.png?version=3bb050e77963cc64295a9ddc77b9b265)
With 50 alive, it takes 26 to lynch.
Sometimes people betray that they are informed with posts. Like I said it's super unlikely that the thought process is present here and much more likely that your post is NOT an example of accidentally betraying that you are informed. Like it already got tossed on the rubbish pile, so stop being obsessed that I respect you enough to pay attention and come vote caught scum with me.In post 449, Nero Cain wrote:If you think I accepted TSE' claim then u clearly aren't reading and are hard cherry picking.
Agreed.In post 209, profii wrote:TSE is a bit but hurt about this lol-wagon which is fair enough but I think the statement I know there will be scum on the wagon is a given - irrespective of TSEs alignment, there is probably scum from either faction on the wagon as they all want to just lynch
Yeah whining about "explaining" reads when I'm one of the only people in the entire game who has given reads is the sort of nonsensical bullshit that made Dunn scum too :3In post 448, Drixx wrote:So you're just gonna keep on avoiding explaining your reads then? Good ... because they were obviously bullshit and your reactions are making it pretty clear you're flailing on being pushed for it. You can eat rope.
Dude's memeing, NeroIn post 437, Nero Cain wrote:apparently hectics meta doesn't matter but still going "I hate d1, Ima going to lurk" but coming in again and again to remind us is a lil' scummy.
The only thing nonsensical is you having 7 posts and showing up with a bunch of "reads" not long after using "the wheel". You can't justify your reads because they're bullshit. Keep flailing it just makes it easier for others to see.In post 453, Kirari Momobami wrote:Yeah whining about "explaining" reads when I'm one of the only people in the entire game who has given reads is the sort of nonsensical bullshit that made Dunn scum too :3In post 448, Drixx wrote:So you're just gonna keep on avoiding explaining your reads then? Good ... because they were obviously bullshit and your reactions are making it pretty clear you're flailing on being pushed for it. You can eat rope.
Second this. would appreciate even a bit of reasoning on the reads, even if I mostly agree with themIn post 457, Nero Cain wrote:in fairness, I would like to more about Kirari's reads but I still feel like TSE is a decent lynch or profii.
TSE isn't going to get away if it isn't lynched today.In post 463, Nero Cain wrote:better lynches than kirari i think
This just seems like a massive misrep it's obvious tse means atleast 1 scum on the wagon. Appear to try and sort tse but in reality do nothing to sort his alignment. I'm leaning more to scum than actual town with a bad take because of the way he also uses the post to suck up to nero and the way his telling TSE to not scum hunt off his wagon.In post 251, The Fonz wrote:In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.
Also, do you all honestly think I’m still toxic?Hey, TSE. Here you imply role information, then do fuck all with it. If you know for a fact, either you have specific info on a single player, or you have some broader "there are x scum in players abc" type knowledge, or you're scum and hinting that you're being bussed like Nero suggests. If you don't, you're completely full of shit.
If you have role info that means town can make a better lynch, then hinting at it rather than outing it means you're already playing badly in an anti town way.
If you're hinting bus, you're scum.
If you're just making it up to try to redirect attention away from you to your Wagoners, then you're being kinda toxic already.
So ten pages in, I'm already left thinking you're either scum, playing really badly, or toxic.
Your Nero vote is pretty bad -even if he's slightly misreading one post, he's showing scumhunting motive. It reads omgus at best, which is not inherently scummy but is a thing I've seen you do that contributes to your perceived toxicity.
So let's turn the volume down. If your "I know there's scum" thing is just your usual overconfidence, then admit that now, and I at least will let it slide. Then tell me something you've noticed about a player NOT on your wagon, and not relating to something they've said about you. Can be anything game relevant. I feel like if you direct your energy at scumhunting on your own wagon, it will continue to come across as defensive and omgussy and look toxic or scummy, making the wagon a self fulfilling prophecy. If you want to help town, look elsewhere, except if you genuinely DO have helpful role info.
This post to means nero isn't scum buddies with the fonz so we can eliminate him from each others scum team.If you want to help town, look elsewhere, except if you genuinely DO have helpful role info.
Go look at the lists KM posted. See if you can spot WHY I pushed them to explain.In post 468, Nero Cain wrote:but there are plenty of town that post reasonless read list. Mastina for instance.
and not gonna lie, I'm still a bit salty.
What do u think of profii?
im having a very hard time looking @ this post and going "oh thats so not what he meant"In post 149, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well I know for a straight out fact 1 of the people on my starting wagon is scum.
So you rolled Scum with TSE and tutored him to claim that??In post 202, Elsa Jay wrote:He claimed a Bodyguard target though. Don't we atleast wanna use that or do we just ignore it?
I don't think you can have any idea of the gamestate if you don't start one now. I mean, it's a 50 players game FGS. Are you going to try to memories who claimed what and who said something that pinged you on what page??In post 206, profii wrote:I haven't made a personal PT for a while.