CoolIn post 11, Xtoxm wrote:hi nomnom
from what ive seen i like your playstyle, im excited to play with you
VOTE: krazy
Krazy Katz is hard town already
CoolIn post 11, Xtoxm wrote:hi nomnom
from what ive seen i like your playstyle, im excited to play with you
VOTE: krazy
Because I'm good at the gameIn post 88, Chronos wrote:How do you know?In post 82, jjh927 wrote:It's page 4
Meta shit will be unreliable and confbiasy at best andyou're both wrong for voting each other.We don't even know it's Krazy
Hey I said FLUFFPOSTING entrances aren't AIIn post 101, Vecna wrote:VOTE: Xtoxm
Lets bury this awkward entrance (also lol @ JJH for saying entrances arent AI)
Actually pretty reasonableIn post 121, Vecna wrote:@JJH odds of everyone posting on page5 being town?
-Actually the first rule of boon clubIn post 1, Boonskiies wrote:1] Play to win. Nobody wants to be a loser.
Your strong belief is wrong. Undivulged non-randomness is bastard. Alignment is assumed to be randomised.In post 244, The Fonz wrote:@Kakeguri: it is strongly my belief that alignment is not randomised prior to role creation, and that someone who wanted to be scum could influence role allocation by picking scum only roles for the Booneytoonz list, or quotes from players from games where they were scum, etc.
HmmIn post 161, Kakeguri Addicts wrote:Do I need to do everything to point out the obvious scum for you people?
VOTE: JJH
His tone is so forced and aggressive it's laughable! Nom vs Krazy Kats is 2 gamblers locked in a silly brawl. You should both fold cause you're probably town. But if you wanna keep going to make it fun for me I don't mind.
UPick ROLES are inherently non-random, but this does not include alignmentIn post 248, The Fonz wrote:Upicks are inherently non random.In post 246, jjh927 wrote:Your strong belief is wrong. Undivulged non-randomness is bastard. Alignment is assumed to be randomised.In post 244, The Fonz wrote:@Kakeguri: it is strongly my belief that alignment is not randomised prior to role creation, and that someone who wanted to be scum could influence role allocation by picking scum only roles for the Booneytoonz list, or quotes from players from games where they were scum, etc.
Nom's thought process is clear and believable. Vecna is also evidently thinking things through, and I believe I first started townreading him after he pointed part of something I'd noticed out regarding KK.In post 172, Conspire wrote:In post 47, jjh927 wrote:CoolIn post 11, Xtoxm wrote:hi nomnom
from what ive seen i like your playstyle, im excited to play with you
VOTE: krazy
Krazy Katz is hard town alreadyIn post 82, jjh927 wrote:It's page 4
Meta shit will be unreliable and confbiasy at best and you're both wrong for voting each other. We don't even know it's KrazyIn post 95, jjh927 wrote:Looks like Vecna can be town tooActually, I do think the stances JJH are taking a little too confident.In post 127, jjh927 wrote:Actually pretty reasonableIn post 121, Vecna wrote:@JJH odds of everyone posting on page5 being town?
I'm town
You're town
Auro is looking nice and towny
Chronos could go either way considering this is a regular reaction that people have when they play with me for the first time
And then Nom posted after you said it, and Nom is town too even if they are wrong
VOTE: JJH
Could you explain your Vecna and Nomo townreads me for me please, JJH? You will be rewarded with many galaxies and my personally favourite asteroid.
-Cosmic
You design roles creatively. Personally I try to avoid making the extremely obvious roles out of picks, so if people picked actual mafia roles in a upick there is 0 chance of them getting exactly them regardless of what they rand.In post 252, The Fonz wrote:What happens if someone picks Traitor, Framer, SK as their picks? How can they possibly end up town?
TownIn post 316, Venus and Mars wrote:@jjh, refresh my memory, what alignment did you roll in RC uPick?
Thanks.
~M
Lmao it took like 300 posts but someone still did the thing even though I fully explained some shit laterIn post 318, Venus and Mars wrote:In post 317, Venus and Mars wrote:While I think you might be right about KK, nothing specifically in that post exactly screams “hard town” to me. Why couldn’t scum have made that post?In post 47, jjh927 wrote:CoolIn post 11, Xtoxm wrote:hi nomnom
from what ive seen i like your playstyle, im excited to play with you
VOTE: krazy
Krazy Katz is hard town already
~M
Wait, Xtoxm made that post NOT KK. Are you sr Xtoxm, is that the basis for your hardtown read on KK?
~M
This is the scummiest post in the game rnIn post 214, davesaz wrote:First post on the next page. This seems like an awful lot of explanation for such an early point in the game.In post 100, jjh927 wrote:I voted Chronos because I decided that might be a decent place to put some pressure down based on the gif entrance
I voted Xtoxm originally because:
I accidentally quoted a post while making a point
I had no intention of expressing my reasons underlying the point
The quote, while not my reasons, could be seen as relevant to the point
So I voted Xtoxm because it sorta just made sense to do it and helped obfuscate things for content's sake
I'm 100% certain that I don't remember anything up to this due to that hard RL day so I'm going to need to re-read. But this caught my eye hard enough to mention it right now.
Then this is the second scummiest postIn post 281, davesaz wrote:Interesting you vote me for something I noticed during catchup, but didn't refer to anyone else who made the same observation about it being a lot of explanation. It's also interesting to note that I specifically said that I didn't remember the context (and still don't). So you'd like to have it looked at in context -- fine, that's part of the plan anyway.In post 253, jjh927 wrote:What's interesting it that nobody has ever given a shit about me explaining things in detail before. Because it's kinda dumb to think town!me isn't gonna give a full explanation for something when there os one and there's someone asking for an explanation, and there's no downside to me explaining it. I'd like those who think that post I made was weird to read it with context and explain why they think it's weird outside of this idea that I can explain my thought process.
Dave has played with me before. He doesn't get a free pass.
VOTE: davesaz
Without going into a looong post while I'm on my phone-
LolIn post 421, Chronos wrote: A town never defends a slot based on THE ACCURACY OF THEIR READS WITHOUT FLIPS.
In post 414, jjh927 wrote: Without going into a looong post while I'm on my phone-
Because he shades based on something other people have mentioned but doesn't commit to a read. I also don't think he has any reason to think it's odd considering he is familiar with my play. The thing that stood out most to him in catchup is something that other people already addressed far beyond its merit that I don't think he should care for.
In post 418, jjh927 wrote:Then he tries to deflect attention back to the other people who discussed the long explanation, and it looks like he also tries to diffuse the situation by backing off. However, I quite clearly stated that the reason I've singled him out is because he's played with me before and doesn't get the free pass to misunderstand my play that people who haven't played with me get.
In post 100, jjh927 wrote:I voted Chronos because I decided that might be a decent place to put some pressure down based on the gif entrance
I voted Xtoxm originally because:
I accidentally quoted a post while making a point
I had no intention of expressing my reasons underlying the point
The quote, while not my reasons, could be seen as relevant to the point
So I voted Xtoxm because it sorta just made sense to do it and helped obfuscate things for content's sake
In post 214, davesaz wrote: First post on the next page. This seems like an awful lot of explanation for such an early point in the game.
I'm 100% certain that I don't remember anything up to this due to that hard RL day so I'm going to need to re-read. But this caught my eye hard enough to mention it right now.
In post 253, jjh927 wrote:What's interesting it that nobody has ever given a shit about me explaining things in detail before. Because it's kinda dumb to think town!me isn't gonna give a full explanation for something when there os one and there's someone asking for an explanation, and there's no downside to me explaining it. I'd like those who think that post I made was weird to read it with context and explain why they think it's weird outside of this idea that I can explain my thought process.
Dave has played with me before. He doesn't get a free pass.
VOTE: davesaz
In post 281, davesaz wrote: Interesting you vote me for something I noticed during catchup, but didn't refer to anyone else who made the same observation about it being a lot of explanation. It's also interesting to note that I specifically said that I didn't remember the context (and still don't). So you'd like to have it looked at in context -- fine, that's part of the plan anyway.
You've played with me before. You should know I work primarily on logic, and thus that there is nothing remotely strange about me articulating my thought process at any stage in the gameIn post 483, davesaz wrote:Not as familiar as you think I am.In post 414, jjh927 wrote:considering he is familiar with my play.
That's exactly the point though?In post 487, davesaz wrote:Like really, you're busting my chops for a post I thought 20 seconds about.
It was directed towards chkflip not following up on my posting about youIn post 522, davesaz wrote:If this was about 281 the very next thing I did was review the context of 100. 283 is the result.In post 477, jjh927 wrote:Boooo no follow-up
our dog is mostly back to normal.
I have to go shopping. Feel free to ask some questions while I’m gone.
Iirc Mastina was the only player I explicitly attempted to pocket in vengeful ghostsIn post 496, Krazy Katz wrote:Jjh927 -- amrun doesn't like, while jjh did try to explicitly pocket me in vengeful ghosts I feel like he's doing so too 'brazenly' here and so I'm disinclined to think he's scum. I do think 100 had an awkward tone but that doesn't change my feelings of the slot overall, will re-evaluate over the weekend maybe
Let's wait until I'm actually pushing thereIn post 596, Krazy Katz wrote:Yeah no good conclusions off like three posts, what did you dislike jjh? Other than their vote on you I mean?
-K