Well Nancy sets them up but I think we do not.In post 3643, Krazy Katz wrote:Also venus do you two know what the rooms do before you set them up?
~Venus
Well Nancy sets them up but I think we do not.In post 3643, Krazy Katz wrote:Also venus do you two know what the rooms do before you set them up?
Well couldn't the SF interfere with the interferers? That would make them the most precious thing to have. Pair that with a loyal oh baby, does it taste good.In post 3602, davesaz wrote:I don't think any SF should be given. Giving a SF makes the recipient ascetic for that night, and if there are roles that can get useful results we really need there to be no interference.
I wonder if Nancy will ever give me a present?In post 3650, Venus and Mars wrote:Well Nancy sets them up but I think we do not.In post 3643, Krazy Katz wrote:Also venus do you two know what the rooms do before you set them up?
~Venus
we already have two instances of interactions we can't explain involving the fruit so it seems to not be reliableIn post 3655, BooneyToonzExpert wrote:Well couldn't the SF interfere with the interferers? That would make them the most precious thing to have. Pair that with a loyal oh baby, does it taste good.In post 3602, davesaz wrote:I don't think any SF should be given. Giving a SF makes the recipient ascetic for that night, and if there are roles that can get useful results we really need there to be no interference.
You will learn to love the fruit.In post 3657, sore feet wrote:we already have two instances of interactions we can't explain involving the fruit so it seems to not be reliableIn post 3655, BooneyToonzExpert wrote:Well couldn't the SF interfere with the interferers? That would make them the most precious thing to have. Pair that with a loyal oh baby, does it taste good.In post 3602, davesaz wrote:I don't think any SF should be given. Giving a SF makes the recipient ascetic for that night, and if there are roles that can get useful results we really need there to be no interference.
(beyond "people are lying" which is unsatisfying)
I don't understand what you're trying to say here.In post 3661, chkflip wrote:George is fucking lynchbait.
Why else does a flailing scum attach themselves so eagerly to an unvote? Are you seriously implying that she thought her only thread of hope was to bus a teammate?
She asked me what I think about him early in the day and I told her if u flip scum he is likely scum. I can be very persistent when I do get a read. That could be why.In post 3670, chkflip wrote:Wouldn't the pro-scum distancing thing to do about the unvote thatliterally nobody else was talking aboutbe to also not bring attention to it?
>getting lynched due to cop guilty
>point out my teammate aggressively
>????
>PROFIT
Like... really?
Show me where you think she’s pointing it out.In post 3668, chkflip wrote:At the time of the "scummy unvote" Titus was literally latching to anything and everything around to save herself, including pointing out and making sure that each and every one of us saw the "scummy unvote." Titus was hoping to spearhead and change in the tide for survival.
Your votes there tell me that you think Titus, in the middle of being lockscum from a cop claim, pointed and re-pointed and re-re-pointed out an error... from one of her teammates... for what? "Town cred" because she knew their role would flip mafia too?
Nothing about that was a fucking bus.
George is lynchbait.