BooneyToonz UPick: Boon There, Done That [END]

[Conspire]

I don’t understand this btw. Also I don’t think Titus wagon analysis is helpful at all; there was literally a guilty on her. What would be more useful would be looking at the context with which people were voting/not voting, but looks like everyone’s too lazy for that and we don’t have time now anyway

And? You don't think Scum would try and resist it? Being off-wagon explicitly shows you were against it.

No? I’m 100% sure I was for that lynch. I can also bring back quotes if you want. Saying us not voting = against is silly, and idk if it’s exactly scum indicative anyway because there was a guilty on her

~Esper

[Conspire]

I got distracted while I was reading

Thank you for your confidence Fonz, we will not disappoint you.

~Esper

Tbf it's Cosmic I'm TR not you

Ouch </3

~Esper

[The Fonz]

I don’t understand this btw. Also I don’t think Titus wagon analysis is helpful at all; there was literally a guilty on her. What would be more useful would be looking at the context with which people were voting/not voting, but looks like everyone’s too lazy for that and we don’t have time now anyway

And? You don't think Scum would try and resist it? Being off-wagon explicitly shows you were against it.

To be honest, I think Scum would want to be on the wagon, knowing the guilty is accurate. Town would want to spend a bit longer in a funky mech game trying to work out if there's an alternative explanation.

*This read in no way colored by me knowing how I did, in fact, act as town. Honest.

[GeorgeBailey]

and idk if it’s exactly scum indicative anyway because there was a guilty on her

I don't think her getting a guilty necessarily meant Town 100% believed nom. There was no way Nom was confirmed, so trusting her was taking a leap of faith.

[Conspire]

Do you think Titus was trying to bus me, @Conspire?

Oh right. Also the barbs thing. Hmmm

~Esper

[GeorgeBailey]

To be honest, I think Scum would want to be on the wagon, knowing the guilty is accurate.

I want to say that the tail end votes would arguably be the most suspicious, but i'm on there. so...

[Conspire]

and idk if it’s exactly scum indicative anyway because there was a guilty on her

I don't think her getting a guilty necessarily meant Town 100% believed nom. There was no way Nom was confirmed, so trusting her was taking a leap of faith.

Why would you lie about a cop guilty? If you were wrong, and with the conviction nomnom had, you’d just be lynched the next day. Scum don’t do that and that’s why I believed her yesterday

~Esper

[GeorgeBailey]

Why would you lie about a cop guilty? If you were wrong, and with the conviction nomnom had, you’d just be lynched the next day. Scum don’t do that and that’s why I believed her yesterday

~Esper

Lying about a cop guilty is definitely something you can pull off in this kind of setup.

[The Fonz]

Do you think Titus was trying to bus me, @Conspire?

Oh right. Also the barbs thing. Hmmm

~Esper

I actually find the barbs thing sus on George's part. I don't know why he didn't try to pass. Then again, no one has claimed Vecna's Barb either. Ironically, George would have been investigable N1 I think, but seems like he was under the radar enough that out of nine potential cops, no one went there.

[GeorgeBailey]

Why would I try and pass the barbs? I don't understand the motive.

[The Fonz]

Why would you lie about a cop guilty? If you were wrong, and with the conviction nomnom had, you’d just be lynched the next day. Scum don’t do that and that’s why I believed her yesterday

~Esper

Lying about a cop guilty is definitely something you can pull off in this kind of setup.

Cole Phelps intensifies.
Its something you might get away with for a while. Also, this stance contradicts the idea you think the scum were off wagon.

[Conspire]

I don’t understand this btw. Also I don’t think Titus wagon analysis is helpful at all; there was literally a guilty on her. What would be more useful would be looking at the context with which people were voting/not voting, but looks like everyone’s too lazy for that and we don’t have time now anyway

And? You don't think Scum would try and resist it? Being off-wagon explicitly shows you were against it.

To be honest, I think Scum would want to be on the wagon, knowing the guilty is accurate. Town would want to spend a bit longer in a funky mech game trying to work out if there's an alternative explanation.

*This read in no way colored by me knowing how I did, in fact, act as town. Honest.

If this wasn’t me.

~Esper

[The Fonz]

Why would I try and pass the barbs? I don't understand the motive.

Well it's an item you couldn't use...

[GeorgeBailey]

It sounded like a cool mechanic, and I haven't been able to use my role, (and I might never tbh) so I wanted at least something lmao.

[GeorgeBailey]

Also, this stance contradicts the idea you think the scum were off wagon.

My stance is that Town couldn't have 100% known nom's guilty was correct. Was nom off-wagon d2??

[GeorgeBailey]

Well it's an item you couldn't use...

...and?

I knew it probably had a passive effect.

[The Fonz]

It sounded like a cool mechanic, and I haven't been able to use my role, (and I might never tbh) so I wanted at least something lmao.

Wait, were you not allowed to pass an item and use your role action?

[GeorgeBailey]

Wait, were you not allowed to pass an item and use your role action?

no no, that's not what I meant.

I'll probably have to claim so lemme just tell you that i've been unsuccessful with my role.

[The Fonz]

Well it's an item you couldn't use...

...and?

I knew it probably had a passive effect.

So if you thought it had a detrimental effect, pass to your SR, or if beneficial effect to your TR. Or just pass to Titus as well who was claiming to be able to make the barbs useful to town. I don't understand the mind set that deliberately avoids doing something confirmable.

[GeorgeBailey]

So if you thought it had a detrimental effect, pass to your SR, or if beneficial effect to your TR. Or just pass to Titus as well who was claiming to be able to make the barbs useful to town. I don't understand the mind set that deliberately avoids doing something confirmable.

I didn't know if it did either good or bad things tbh. Why would passing it to anyone make it confirmable?

[GeorgeBailey]

And if I passed it to Titus, Nom might not have been able to Cop-shot her.

[The Fonz]

So if you thought it had a detrimental effect, pass to your SR, or if beneficial effect to your TR. Or just pass to Titus as well who was claiming to be able to make the barbs useful to town. I don't understand the mind set that deliberately avoids doing something confirmable.

I didn't know if it did either good or bad things tbh. Why would passing it to anyone make it confirmable?

It's like visiting. The larger the pool of known/claimed night actions, the easier it is to spot where people are lying.

[The Fonz]

And if I passed it to Titus, Nom might not have been able to Cop-shot her.

Ex post facto justification.

[The Fonz]

BTW, I'm almost certainly not moving off George without a claim here.

[Michael Scott]

Claim picks too, btw.