Mini 2134 Gin's Joint Pick4U - GAME OVER

[Ginngie]

Votecount

Bulbazak- 4 (Dunnstral, Alisae, MariaR, Enter)

L - 3

mastina- 2 (Lady Lambdadelta, Pine)

L - 5

Pine- 2 (mastina, Bulbazak)

L - 5

Not Voting - 5 (The Rest of you fucks)

With

13

alive, it takes

7

to lynch.

At deadline,

Pink Ball

would be lynched.

Day One's deadline is Monday, April 27th, @ 10:00 PM EST: (expired on 2020-04-27 22:00:00).

chronic masturbaters
-mastina
-Bulbazak
-PenguinPower
-Taly
-Pink Ball

[Dunnstral]

Alisae and MariaR are voting twice?

vote count fixed

[Dunnstral]

I'M FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Nice

@Enter: You still have yet to give a reason why masturbating would be bad.

p-edit: This neutral 3rd party fear has always been bull crap. Most players with a neutral 3rd party still have a town bent, which means they are more likely to help town than scum if given the choice. Lynching them wastes a lynch and ignores any help they can give. They are an easy wagon for scum to push and hide on. If you want to vig them, fine, but if the objective is easily obtainable and does not go against our wincon, there's no point wasting time trying to kill them.

What is the difference between lynching mastina and vigging mastina that makes one of those acceptable?

[MariaR]

I'm sorry for what I just did to someone but I had no choice weee

[Bulbazak]

What is the difference between lynching mastina and vigging mastina that makes one of those acceptable?

Lynches are not 100% town controlled and are one of the best sources of information on later days. That's why policy lynching a 3p "just because" is bad, because it's easy for scum to blend in, creates too much noise in the moment, and might not be useful on later days. And that's ignoring that there are certain 3p roles you don't want to lynch at all in a self-proclaimed bastard game where everything is on the table. A vig is 100% town controlled and can be used to get rid of players or roles that can hurt the town in the long run or that can cause a distraction.

Given that vigs are readily available, that should be an easy choice for anyone that wants to get rid of mastina because of the 3p claim. Policy lynching mastina just because she claimed 3p is going to shorten the day and not give us as much information as literally any other lynch.

[Bulbazak]

Anyone else notice that only 11 people can vote?

[Dunnstral]

A vig is 100% town controlled

Anybody can buy the vig from the black market.

and can be used to get rid of players or roles that can hurt the town in the long run or that can cause a distraction.

But lynching the same players is scum motivated?

Given that vigs are readily available, that should be an easy choice for anyone that wants to get rid of mastina because of the 3p claim. Policy lynching mastina just because she claimed 3p is going to shorten the day and not give us as much information as literally any other lynch.

First off, the vig power costs 3 - it's not readily available on night 1 unless somebody decides to send their money to somebody else, or if somebody has a role that gives them more money.
Second, again, anyone can grab the vig power. Including the third party claim.

It sounds like you're saying we should vig the third party claim instead of lynching them, and that's not what you were arguing earlier either, you were saying the third party was easily provable/benign, or something. Actually, you've been pushing third party agendas harder than the third party claim.

[Bulbazak]

You asked the difference between lynching and vigging. I gave you the simplified answer. Scum are not going to shoot mastina. Only town will. And lynches provide more information than vigging. I really don't see how informative a mastina lynch would be if she's a 3p, which was why she was being waggoned. Outside of that, I'm not arguing semantics with you.

Same thing with the 3p claim and why I'm against lynching her. I've given my reasons. Why is wanting to test a verifiable claim of a neutral 3p scum motivated, especially when it could tell us who is town and who is scum?

[Ginngie]

I just found alcohol in my fridge i didn't know existed.

[Bulbazak]

The best kind.

[Ginngie]

Okay beer one told me to shotgun it.

Beer 2 told me to watch cats

[TheRealGin-N-Tonic]

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

[TheRealGin-N-Tonic]

EWWWWWWW

this tie doesn't rotate and thats so disgusting ew

[TheRealGin-N-Tonic]

who can I contact to make this able to edit shit

[Ginngie]

my dreams have died and I'm sad

please return to your game

[Ginngie]

THIS IS FALVOR FOR THE GAME

[Pine]

I fucking love you, Ginny.

Okay, I am feeling much better than I did earlier in the day.

Yay! A Maria!

Just going to ignore mastina now that a critical mass is declining to play her game. Even odds she's got a kill she'll direct my way, but eh, these things happen.

Bulbazak does indeed look like a solid vote at this stage.

VOTE: Bulba

Going to bed, hopefully a much brighter day tomorrow.

[Alisae]

Dunny, can we kill Pine if Bulba flips town

[Bulbazak]

Or you can vote him right now. We both know that vote was funny.

[Alisae]

ur scummy

[Bulbazak]

And you're either scum or bad. I'm not 100% sold on mastina's read, but I figure she knows Pine better than I do, and I don't like his pivot onto me. But I've also been wary of you all day phase. So I don't like that "If Bulba flips town we vote Pine" thing. I'm off, because I realize I may be too close on this. I'm just looking for the bad faith logic that signifies for sure that you're scum. I haven't really seen it as of yet.

[Alisae]

you don't like my playstyle
cool

[Alisae]

btw
ari is scum
not sure if anyone knew
but now they do

[Alisae]

I mean...yeah, I think that's super suspect and as good a D1 vote as we're likely to get.

Mastina, seriously, you need to learn to keep it in your pants.

VOTE: mastina

Know that you are my top scum suspect.

[Bulbazak]

When do you get out of the sheeping phase?

P-edit: I had Ari and Gamma as possible lurking scum in my neighborhood. It made sense with the earlier mastina wagon theory.