In post 688, Enter wrote:I also would like to note the fact that while Gamma was here, they cast suspicion on the entire Bulbazeks wagon and exclusively the bulbazek wagon without reading much more than the most recent three pages.
In post 701, Bulbazak wrote:So you just throw shade at the slot for kick and giggles then.
No, I'm not. I very much expect to die tonight and I also have difficulty keeping track of my thoughts throughout the game, so having a digital log in the thread for myself (and others) to follow helps when reviewing the thread.
So what's the point? And don't say "So people can look back at my thoughts after I die.", because that's crap. You didn't give an opinion. You just threw shade and pretended it was significant.
VOTE: Enter
I've been waiting on Bingle to see if he had some meta on you. I finally just did a quick meta-dive myself to see if you were incredibly toxic as town or used open-ended neutral language. I didn't see any, and I also noticed a complete different way in how you approached your town games compared with how you've been approaching this one. And I'd much rather believe that you're just scum here trying to muddy the thread than a town player who decided to suddenly be an a-hole.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 670, Enter wrote:
I'm voting Bulbazek over mastina because I don't trust him but I don't think mastina is group scum.
I thought this was made very clear. I don't think you should be in the game another day. I think lynching mastina is better than lynching town but worse than lynching scum.
Let's go back to this. You don't think I noticed how neutral your language in regards to me is? "I don't trust him" instead of "He is scum". And then just "I don't think you should be in the game another day." which does not say anything about an alignment read. So technically you can say you told the truth that I was not scum, even though you just imply it. I'd expect stronger language, especially given what follows, but you're incredibly weak and take a lot of prodding just to commit to a scum read.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
And you're only now trying to qualify your vote on me as being a scum read, even though you've repeatedly framed it as a policy lynch because you did not like or agree with my logic (another reason why saying "lynching mastina is better than lynching town but worse than lynching scum" just came off as extremely weird). You've even gone out of your way to ignore other players you've called scummy just to push this agenda.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 704, Bulbazak wrote:So what's the point? And don't say "So people can look back at my thoughts after I die.", because that's crap. You didn't give an opinion. You just threw shade and pretended it was significant.
You still manage to present me as taking a position I'm not saying, and though I felt I stated it pretty explicitly, you still manage to miss the point.
VOTE: Enter
I've been waiting on Bingle to see if he had some meta on you. I finally just did a quick meta-dive myself to see if you were incredibly toxic as town or used open-ended neutral language. I didn't see any, and I also noticed a complete different way in how you approached your town games compared with how you've been approaching this one. And I'd much rather believe that you're just scum here trying to muddy the thread than a town player who decided to suddenly be an a-hole.
Lol.
You managed to ignore the meta given by multiple other players this game, decided to do a dive of your own, and still completely fucked up.
In post 670, Enter wrote:
I'm voting Bulbazek over mastina because I don't trust him but I don't think mastina is group scum.
I thought this was made very clear. I don't think you should be in the game another day. I think lynching mastina is better than lynching town but worse than lynching scum.
Let's go back to this. You don't think I noticed how neutral your language in regards to me is? "I don't trust him" instead of "He is scum". And then just "I don't think you should be in the game another day." which does not say anything about an alignment read. So technically you can say you told the truth that I was not scum, even though you just imply it. I'd expect stronger language, especially given what follows, but you're incredibly weak and take a lot of prodding just to commit to a scum read.
In post 706, Bulbazak wrote:And you're only now trying to qualify your vote on me as being a scum read, even though you've repeatedly framed it as a policy lynch because you did not like or agree with my logic (another reason why saying "lynching mastina is better than lynching town but worse than lynching scum" just came off as extremely weird). You've even gone out of your way to ignore other players you've called scummy just to push this agenda.
Lol.
You are still misrepresenting me because you probably still don't understand. I'm not comitting to you as a scum read because I don't care if you're scum or not. The closest name for my approach to you is a policy lynch.
In post 704, Bulbazak wrote:So what's the point? And don't say "So people can look back at my thoughts after I die.", because that's crap. You didn't give an opinion. You just threw shade and pretended it was significant.
VOTE: Enter
I've been waiting on Bingle to see if he had some meta on you. I finally just did a quick meta-dive myself to see if you were incredibly toxic as town or used open-ended neutral language. I didn't see any, and I also noticed a complete different way in how you approached your town games compared with how you've been approaching this one. And I'd much rather believe that you're just scum here trying to muddy the thread than a town player who decided to suddenly be an a-hole.
No sir.
No.
That... that is bait.
Last edited by Ginngie on Sat Apr 18, 2020 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yes my Lord, but questions are dangerous, for they have answers.
13 heads and counting now, plurality is adaptive. If our experience might help you,
I am not scum reading you. I have at no point in this game pretended to scum read you. I don't know or care if you're scum. I have said this all game as well.
And I'm in no way calling Gamma or Taly scummy. I think Taly is likely town. I quoted those posts for the exact reason I said I quoted those posts: to keep track of my thoughts on re-reead. If you thought those actions made those players scummy without me adding my opinion, that's a you read on them, not a me read on them.
In post 688, Enter wrote:I also would like to note the fact that while Gamma was here, they cast suspicion on the entire Bulbazeks wagon and exclusively the bulbazek wagon without reading much more than the most recent three pages.
To say that there's no agenda behind this is bull crap.
@LLD: I've been incredibly patient with Enter and have been trying to explain those pings away. I'm done now. So if you've got something to say, then find a way to get it through whatever post restriction you have.
Bulbazak is so town that everytime someone votes him Mastin coughs blood.
In post 688, Enter wrote:I also would like to note the fact that while Gamma was here, they cast suspicion on the entire Bulbazeks wagon and exclusively the bulbazek wagon without reading much more than the most recent three pages.
To say that there's no agenda behind this is bull crap.
In post 397, Alisae wrote:btw
ari is scum
not sure if anyone knew
but now they do
What makes you say this?
As I remind people every game nowadays, I am a low poster who is often disengaged from things and will go multiple prod ranges before posting anything helpful. This is NAI.
In all honesty, I was watching Star Trek: Voyager in my downtime between work shifts. I may go back to that soon actually.
