Newbie 2001 | Game Over

[JacksonVirgo]

VOTE: Amercelo
Because it sounds like A mafioso.


Henceforth you will be dubbed Ame, barring strenuous objection. Efficiency. Efcncy. Efcy. Ey.

I love this, lock-town.
I call him Armin fyi

[JacksonVirgo]

Ive played 2 games w JV. Idk any1 else

This is gonna be fun playing with you all again
Well for those I've played with before

[JacksonVirgo]

Man, I haven't played Mafia on here in years. It's nice to see some things don't change.

VOTE: Petrichorus

Gotta spread the Day 1 love around.

Welcome back!
Hope we aren't too horrible for ya lol

[72offsuit]

VOTE: Amercelo
Because it sounds like A mafioso.


Henceforth you will be dubbed Ame, barring strenuous objection. Efficiency. Efcncy. Efcy. Ey.

I love this, lock-town.
I call him Armin fyi

I must say, I do like your gut reads. Correct again. <3
Though gut reads are pretty easy for scum :O

[Petrichorus]

RVS is either okay or awful dependent on who you're playing with imho. I have ran a lot of games of mafia in Meat Space and I find that, discounting lucky rolecopping and kills, you can tell if the townies have a chance by how they react in RVS. If they're being observant and seeing who is 'randomly' voting for who they've got a good chance. Harder to get that tell on a forum though, got to assume everyone is picking up on everything.

Also, Tuxedo Mask is a great name ngl.

[Petrichorus]

Man, I haven't played Mafia on here in years. It's nice to see some things don't change.

VOTE: Petrichorus

Gotta spread the Day 1 love around.

Aw man, that love's contagious and rather accusatory. BV You've been on here since I was last playing Runescape, how do you stay sane or have you given up on that?

[Petrichorus]

Re-read the quote, and changing my question: BV, nice to see you back I suppose. Played any mafia elsewhere in the meantime?

[Karnage]

Vote Count 1.1

fwogcarf (2) ~

JacksonVirgo, Tuxedo Mask,

JacksonVirgo (2) ~

Micc, Petrichorus,

amercelo (1) ~

72offsuit,

Petrichorus (1) ~

bv310,

72offsuit (1) ~

Gypyx,

Not voting (2) ~

fwogcarf, amercelo,

With 9 alive it's 5 to lynch

Deadline: (expired on 2020-05-04 20:18:01)

V/LA:

none

[Karnage]

Mod Note

amercelo has requested replacement.

[JacksonVirgo]

Mod Note

amercelo has requested replacement.

That's sad

[fwogcarf]

im gonna make a public note that i will be looking for distancing/socializing between a certain two people

going to help readmaking imo

Have you played with these two people? :thonk:

Well i meant just two people in general

[fwogcarf]

Ive played 2 games w JV. Idk any1 else

same but with jackson

[fwogcarf]

Vote Count 1.1

fwogcarf (2) ~

JacksonVirgo, Tuxedo Mask,

JacksonVirgo (2) ~

Micc, Petrichorus,

amercelo (1) ~

72offsuit,

Petrichorus (1) ~

bv310,

72offsuit (1) ~

Gypyx,

Not voting (2) ~

fwogcarf, amercelo,

With 9 alive it's 5 to lynch

Deadline: (expired on 2020-05-04 20:18:01)

V/LA:

none

you promised ((

VOTE: Tuxedo Mask

[fwogcarf]

my disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined

[JacksonVirgo]

Ive played 2 games w JV. Idk any1 else

same but with jackson

I am JV tho?

[fwogcarf]

Ive played 2 games w JV. Idk any1 else

same but with jackson

I am JV tho?

oh lol

[Micc]

VOTE: Tuxedo mask

I think his vote was pretty bad and the follow up attempts at explaining it aren't great. Of all the things to pick out from fwogcarf so far, I don't see how inconsistency can be the issue to focus on. fwogcarf was pretty clear the whole way that he was spend his time cracking jokes even if he suspected there'd be people on the playerlist who weren't up for that.

I also don't think Tuxedo's framing of his vote as a reaction test quite fits when the read he got off fwogcarf's reaction is neutral. I'd say players in general ignore RVS votes they get more often than giving any kind of reaction, so if Tuxedo's reaction test wasn't prepared for that, its not a very useful reaction test. And also since he's still got the vote there, was it really a reaction test at all?

[Tuxedo Mask]

VOTE: Tuxedo mask

I think his vote was pretty bad and the follow up attempts at explaining it aren't great. Of all the things to pick out from fwogcarf so far, I don't see how inconsistency can be the issue to focus on. fwogcarf was pretty clear the whole way that he was spend his time cracking jokes even if he suspected there'd be people on the playerlist who weren't up for that.

I also don't think Tuxedo's framing of his vote as a reaction test quite fits when the read he got off fwogcarf's reaction is neutral. I'd say players in general ignore RVS votes they get more often than giving any kind of reaction, so if Tuxedo's reaction test wasn't prepared for that, its not a very useful reaction test. And also since he's still got the vote there, was it really a reaction test at all?

Okay, let's try again.
fwogcarf has a goofy play style, that's fine. I read that as going no specific way or the other. Him ignoring my vote is consistent with that play style, IMO. So to me, it's neutral. I was hoping the conversation would evolve, as they say in #20 they're going to shit post till there is content. When I prod him for an RVS vote or two explain why he doesn't have one, he gives me the run-around. Saying he's all for it and not giving one, that to me reads inconsistent.

Though maybe I didn't put enough thought into getting ignored. I mean he's once again saying he'll wait for content but doesn't even acknowledge my vote onto him. That's a bit scummy.

As for my vote still being there, I can vote someone I think is acting scummy (even when no one else has acted) while simultaneously hope the vote sparks a reaction. My vote remaining there is because I'm happy with it, and have nowhere else to move it.

In a final attempt at making my POV absolutely clear, he has a jokey playstyle, so jokes to me are neutral. Outside of his playstyle, he mentions waiting for the game to get serious and have content while avoiding making content himself. And again, that's not the jokes, having a meme playstyle is just that a playstyle, but there is a disconnect between what they say and what they do.

[fwogcarf]

owo content

[fwogcarf]

VOTE: Tuxedo mask

I think his vote was pretty bad and the follow up attempts at explaining it aren't great. Of all the things to pick out from fwogcarf so far, I don't see how inconsistency can be the issue to focus on. fwogcarf was pretty clear the whole way that he was spend his time cracking jokes even if he suspected there'd be people on the playerlist who weren't up for that.

I also don't think Tuxedo's framing of his vote as a reaction test quite fits when the read he got off fwogcarf's reaction is neutral. I'd say players in general ignore RVS votes they get more often than giving any kind of reaction, so if Tuxedo's reaction test wasn't prepared for that, its not a very useful reaction test. And also since he's still got the vote there, was it really a reaction test at all?

Okay, let's try again.
fwogcarf has a goofy play style, that's fine. I read that as going no specific way or the other. Him ignoring my vote is consistent with that play style, IMO. So to me, it's neutral. I was hoping the conversation would evolve, as they say in #20 they're going to shit post till there is content. When I prod him for an RVS vote or two explain why he doesn't have one, he gives me the run-around. Saying he's all for it and not giving one, that to me reads inconsistent.

Though maybe I didn't put enough thought into getting ignored. I mean he's once again saying he'll wait for content but doesn't even acknowledge my vote onto him. That's a bit scummy.

As for my vote still being there, I can vote someone I think is acting scummy (even when no one else has acted) while simultaneously hope the vote sparks a reaction. My vote remaining there is because I'm happy with it, and have nowhere else to move it.

In a final attempt at making my POV absolutely clear, he has a jokey playstyle, so jokes to me are neutral. Outside of his playstyle, he mentions waiting for the game to get serious and have content while avoiding making content himself. And again, that's not the jokes, having a meme playstyle is just that a playstyle, but there is a disconnect between what they say and what they do.

i thought your vote was rvs so it didnt deserve a reaction from me. if its serious though then usually i ask what the reason behind it is.

[Tuxedo Mask]

Spoiler:

VOTE: Tuxedo mask

I think his vote was pretty bad and the follow up attempts at explaining it aren't great. Of all the things to pick out from fwogcarf so far, I don't see how inconsistency can be the issue to focus on. fwogcarf was pretty clear the whole way that he was spend his time cracking jokes even if he suspected there'd be people on the playerlist who weren't up for that.

I also don't think Tuxedo's framing of his vote as a reaction test quite fits when the read he got off fwogcarf's reaction is neutral. I'd say players in general ignore RVS votes they get more often than giving any kind of reaction, so if Tuxedo's reaction test wasn't prepared for that, its not a very useful reaction test. And also since he's still got the vote there, was it really a reaction test at all?

Okay, let's try again.
fwogcarf has a goofy play style, that's fine. I read that as going no specific way or the other. Him ignoring my vote is consistent with that play style, IMO. So to me, it's neutral. I was hoping the conversation would evolve, as they say in #20 they're going to shit post till there is content. When I prod him for an RVS vote or two explain why he doesn't have one, he gives me the run-around. Saying he's all for it and not giving one, that to me reads inconsistent.

Though maybe I didn't put enough thought into getting ignored. I mean he's once again saying he'll wait for content but doesn't even acknowledge my vote onto him. That's a bit scummy.

As for my vote still being there, I can vote someone I think is acting scummy (even when no one else has acted) while simultaneously hope the vote sparks a reaction. My vote remaining there is because I'm happy with it, and have nowhere else to move it.

In a final attempt at making my POV absolutely clear, he has a jokey playstyle, so jokes to me are neutral. Outside of his playstyle, he mentions waiting for the game to get serious and have content while avoiding making content himself. And again, that's not the jokes, having a meme playstyle is just that a playstyle, but there is a disconnect between what they say and what they do.

i thought your vote was rvs so it didnt deserve a reaction from me. if its serious though then usually i ask what the reason behind it is.

I can't read that as anything other than disingenuous. I cast an RVS vote (sorry Micc), then said to you we should start making content and began asking questions. I didn't like your answers, voted you, and continued asking questions. I don't see how you can mistake it for RVS.

But I don't wanna tunnel on you, so if other people can start posting that'd be great. I'm very bored in quarantine.

Man, I haven't played Mafia on here in years. It's nice to see some things don't change.

VOTE: Petrichorus

Gotta spread the Day 1 love around.

Aren't wagons considered more effective to move out of RVS?

Anyways for the tuxedo / fwogcarf interaction :

First of all, i really don't think it's two scums distanciating each other, because it looks like the don't want to do the same thing with the conversation, fwog just wants to talk about what tuxedo has asked him to talk about while tuxedo is trying to push the game in serious mode


And yeah, fwog is kind of contradictory with his apparent will of "getting into serious stage" but at the same time not doing much and kinda shitposting about what videos he's listening to

Like this.

And I like Petrichorus's intro.

[fwogcarf]

ok that's fine then

[Gypyx]

VOTE: Tuxedo mask

I think his vote was pretty bad and the follow up attempts at explaining it aren't great. Of all the things to pick out from fwogcarf so far, I don't see how inconsistency can be the issue to focus on. fwogcarf was pretty clear the whole way that he was spend his time cracking jokes even if he suspected there'd be people on the playerlist who weren't up for that.

I also don't think Tuxedo's framing of his vote as a reaction test quite fits when the read he got off fwogcarf's reaction is neutral. I'd say players in general ignore RVS votes they get more often than giving any kind of reaction, so if Tuxedo's reaction test wasn't prepared for that, its not a very useful reaction test. And also since he's still got the vote there, was it really a reaction test at all?

Could you explain how this is indicative of Tuxedo's alignement, all i see there is just that you show some fairly weak logic

[fwogcarf]

hey gypyx how you doing

[Gypyx]

Hi there, doing good, what are your current reads on the game?