Nomic: The Constitution Game - Game Over

[StrangerCoug]

I'm trying to think of interesting things to add to propose xD Maybe an unlock of sorts if we hit seven and/or nine players?

[logan5123]

Locking things behind something as fluid as player count seems like a bad time, especially since it isn't really controllable; either people join or they don't. You just have to be a good host and hope.

oh and VOTE: NAY 428

[Allomancer]

VOTE: Nay 428

[Ircher]

428 fails. (Note that 427 has not passed yet. The president doesn't have the power to pass proposals, and even if they did, 366 states that 2/3rds of the advisory board agrees with it. Even if we count my approval, that's only 1/3 approving of it.)
---

Up to date as of post 652.

Pending Proposals

1.

Proposal 419

(610) by Ircher: Except for official moderator communication (e.g.: reminder pms, cards, etc.), private communication is not allowed. Additional exceptions may be made in future proposals as needed.
Yea - Ircher
Nay - Allomancer, logan5123
Not Voting - StrangerCoug, Jake the Wolfie
(expired on 2020-04-28 16:45:00) time left.

2.

Proposal 424

(625) by logan5123: Every player starts with 20 thousand (20,000) Life. It may be increased or decreased by other rules. Life does not count as "points" for the purposes of 393. A player cannot win while they have less than 1 Life. While a player has 0 Life or less, they gain a thousand (1,000) Life every time they would gain coins. [I know what I'm doing with this, trust me.]
Yea - logan5123, Allomancer, StrangerCoug (Reservations)
Nay -
Not Voting - Ircher, Jake the Wolfie
(expired on 2020-04-28 18:40:00) time left.

3.

Proposal 425

(625) by logan5123: Players may exchange 1 reputation for a thousand (1,000) Life, but not vice versa. This is done automatically if any given player has more than 0 reputation and 0 or less Life. This proposal automatically fails if 424 fails.
Yea - logan5123, Allomancer, StrangerCoug (Reservations)
Nay -
Not Voting - Ircher, Jake the Wolfie
(expired on 2020-04-28 18:40:00) time left.

4.

Proposal 427

(643) by Ircher: Rule 361 is amended to, "The president shall reign as president for seven days before a new president must be selected."
Yea - Ircher, logan5123
Nay - Jake the Wolfie
Not Voting - Allomancer, StrangerCoug
(expired on 2020-04-28 22:00:00) time left.

Pending Motions

[Jake The Wolfie]

VOTE: Nay 428

There are other ways we can use/propose to limit his power. That's a considerable nerf.

It also stops people from electing
the
same
god
bloody
damn
person
every
election
cycle
like
jesus
christ

[Jake The Wolfie]

You don't even have to elect me. Just elect someone other than Logan so that they don't get flooded with the rewards that come with being elected.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 429:

During a general election, no candidate may vote for themselves. They may abstain from the vote.

[Ircher]

There are term limits. In fact, logan5123 is at his term limit, so we'll have a different president next time.

[Allomancer]

VOTE: Nay 429

[Ircher]

VOTE: Abstain 424
VOTE: Nay 425 with Reservations
I don't like the automatic conversion part of the proposal.
VOTE: Nay 429
Doesn't change a thing honestly.

Proposal 430: Players may buy lottery tickets for 20 coins. The lottery occurs weekly. The reward for winning the lottery is a card from the card deck. A 1d{Number of Tickets} shall be rolled in the thread. The moderator will keep track of lottery ticket numbers; the winner is the player whose lottery ticket number is rolled. Lottery ticket numbers begin at 1 each week.

[Allomancer]

VOTE: Yea 430

[logan5123]

VOTE: NAY 429

VOTE: YEA 430

Wait, really? Swore that the approval rule was approved.

OK then.

[logan5123]

Oh, and as for the automatic conversion, it's a way to prevent inflation: Just kill the person with all the money and they'll be forced to spend some of it to revive themselves!

Repeat until not inflated


oh and you might be able to find a loophole otherwise, making it automatic just works


besides, if you want to not win that much just convert it into coins in advance

[StrangerCoug]

VOTE: Yea 419
VOTE: Nay 429
VOTE: Yea 430

[StrangerCoug]

Oh, and VOTE: Yea 427 as well.

[logan5123]

now that I realized what I just said


uh


that's a bad moral
to say the least

[Jake The Wolfie]

I'm temted to give myself Infinite Reputation/coins rn

[Jake The Wolfie]

Hey Ircher, if I were to have Infinite Reputation, could I convert some portion of the infinity (like half) into infinite coins?

[Ircher]

Infinity is not a number, so it doesn't matter.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Fine, what about Aleph Null Rep?

[Ircher]

It doesn't matter because currently, you can't get Aleph Null Rep. Also 427 passed. I'll figure out the rest tomorrow.

[Jake The Wolfie]

If I found a way to get Aleph Null Reputation, could I then convert half of it to Coins, and have Aleph Null Coins?

[Ircher]

429 fails. 427 and 430 pass.

[Jake The Wolfie]

Proposal 431:

Amend 421 to be the following:

421: Players may not make any kind of proposal that target specifically named players. Attempting to do so will cause the player to lose 5 reputation. [This includes actual proposals, motions, and contracts as of now.]

[Ircher]

VOTE: Nay 431
Considering that the explanation doesn't hold legal weight, that change would actually be confusing. Rule 421 specifically names proposals not "proposals and anything of that sort". (That latter wording is also pretty bad as it is unclear what qualifies and what does not qualify.)