Mini Normal 2130: Mafia From Home [Game Over]


User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:00 pm

Post by Looker »

VOTE: Egix96
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #5 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 31, 2020 3:01 pm

Post by Looker »

I know you're the Mod
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #26 (isolation #2) » Wed Apr 01, 2020 7:39 am

Post by Looker »

In post 10, Saudade wrote:i hardclaim mason
In post 11, Saudade wrote:also i am brilliant
O wow, you're back. At least this won't be boring.

  • @Egix: Why did you get rid of the Growlithe?
VOTE: riabi

p-edit: Aw fack lol
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #116 (isolation #3) » Fri Apr 03, 2020 5:19 am

Post by Looker »

In post 76, Firebringer wrote:VC when I wake upz

Night nerds
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #207 (isolation #4) » Sat Apr 04, 2020 6:19 am

Post by Looker »

In post 201, profii wrote:I applaud the scum making this happen to be fair.
VOTE: Riabi

  • I haven't been keeping up with this game, so sorry if I missed some interactions
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #276 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 05, 2020 2:08 am

Post by Looker »

In post 217, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 212, Riabi wrote:
In post 206, Battle Mage wrote:Ok that's -1 I think, Proffi now would be a good time to claim!
Count again, I would have never voted to make him -1
That'd be too conspicuous right? :giggle:

Speaking of conspicuous, haven't heard from Zantetsu in a while! Zantetsu - what do you think of Proffi and his bandwagon?
In post 220, Saudade wrote:
In post 205, Riabi wrote:Yeah, this mounting argument against Proffi is pretty damn compelling in my mind, and scanning through the game Mage mentioned here... I have to agree, this doesn't look like the same person.

UNVOTE: Saudade Not because my read has changed here, I still think he should be lynched. But, with all the evidence against Profii, I feel like the right move is to
VOTE: Profii
So me and profii are partners
In post 221, Saudade wrote:Hmmmmmmm such confidence by page 10
VOTE: Riabi
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #344 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 05, 2020 2:06 pm

Post by Looker »

  • This is a struggle.
  • @Zantetsu: Because I'm accustomed to scum being opportunistic. If he weren't scum, scum would sheep me and, once he townflipped, blame me for the loss. The fact that no one's touching him makes me more suspicious. It just happened in Mini 2119.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #367 (isolation #7) » Mon Apr 06, 2020 2:28 am

Post by Looker »

In post 355, Egix96 wrote:
In post 344, Looker wrote:
  • This is a struggle.
  • @Zantetsu: Because I'm accustomed to scum being opportunistic. If he weren't scum, scum would sheep me and, once he townflipped, blame me for the loss. The fact that no one's touching him makes me more suspicious. It just happened in Mini 2119.
Big problem with this - you're not providing much in the way of actual reasoning to begin with. As far as I can tell, you're just spamming a Riabi vote in people's faces, which is more likely to annoy them rather than making them want to follow you.
Fair. So I'm guessing everyone thinks he's town as of right now. We'll see how rapidly that changes.

  • @Riabi: No; you're not right. I feel that you're a weak player and will soon be an easy target. I was just testing the waters for bloodlust.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #411 (isolation #8) » Mon Apr 06, 2020 11:11 am

Post by Looker »

In post 378, Zantetsu wrote:Looker I don't understand post .

"Fair. So I'm guessing everyone thinks he's town as of right now. We'll see how"

So you are saying you think Riabi is scum and none of us realize it yet?

"@Riabi: No; you're not right. I feel that you're a weak player and will soon be an easy target. I was just testing the waters for bloodlust."

But now directly to Riabi you are saying you think he's town? Because why would scum 'bloodlust' after another scum player? Or are you saying you are testing the waters for town bloodlust? In which case what does that even accomplish?
I'm setting boundaries/establishing stances. It's also Schrödinger's cat - if he's scum, I find it suspicious that no one's voted him despite openly criticizing/insulting his intelligence/play; however, if he's town, I want to make any agenda shifts more obvious when he becomes mislynch bait, since people have been openly criticizing/insulting his intelligence/play.

  • @Luca: What would you like to hear from me?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #461 (isolation #9) » Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:55 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 427, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Half the playerlist hasn’t posted in years.
+1

  • @Zan
    • Who?
    • I'm currently voting Riabi
    • ---
    • That's because I am.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #462 (isolation #10) » Mon Apr 06, 2020 1:56 pm

Post by Looker »

Actually, I take that back; it's only Anotora - Churros is here and even that's not 'half the playerlist'
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #496 (isolation #11) » Mon Apr 06, 2020 9:39 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 463, Zantetsu wrote:
In post 461, Looker wrote:Who?
Battle Mage post . Not sure if you'd call that openly criticizing but I kind of would. Battle Mage is implying that Riabi is on a sh**wagon and is also questioning how sincere he could be in his reads. And also is voting him.
I'm currently voting Riabi
So you are. Three times in fact. I have no idea how I forgot that, mea culpa.
That's because I am.
You seem pretty passive. Do you have any reads to give?
  • Goddamn it; I missed it because the mod didn't have a votecount.
  • ---
  • I have a spectrum of people I'm willing to lynch
    Spoiler:
    :dead: {profii | churros/BMage/Anotora | Una/Zantetsu/Norway | Egix/Saudade | 72offsuit | Luca/Riabi}
In post 478, Riabi wrote:
In post 477, Churros wrote:I could do Riabi as well.
Because you mis-characterized my thought process? Or do you have another, actual reason?
Because you're a weak player :lol: (jk)
In post 489, Saudade wrote:i take out all my frustrations on people on the internet
That's because you're an idiot.
Spoiler:
:lol: :lol: :lol: Clearly I'm joking



VOTE: Churros Jumping onto the biggest wagon after a long absence seems convenient.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #562 (isolation #12) » Tue Apr 07, 2020 5:31 am

Post by Looker »

In post 555, NorwegianboyEE wrote:VOTE: Profii
Maybe this will wake him up.
Are you trying to wake him up or kill him?

  • @Churros: You appear to be upset. Are you offended?
    • Also, do you feel that pushing Riabi was "going with along the gamestate"?
VOTE: profii You're back at L-2 again. Do you feel that your wagon is all town?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #574 (isolation #13) » Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:33 am

Post by Looker »

In post 393, Firebringer wrote:
Flavor: When you perform murder from home. Please make sure to mantain six feet between you and your target.

Vote Count 1.04

Anotora (1): Zantetsu,
Battle Mage(2): Churros, proffii
UnaBombah (1): 72offsuit
proffi (3): Egix96, Riabi, Battle Mage
Riabi (1): Looker
NorwegianboyEEE (1): UnaBOmbah,
Anotora (2): Saudade, NorwegianboyEE
Churros (1): Luca Blight

Not Voting (1): Anotora,


Time Until Deadline (expired on 2020-04-14 20:00:00)
With 13 Alive, It Takes 7 to Lynch.
You have Anotora listed twice
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #579 (isolation #14) » Tue Apr 07, 2020 6:44 am

Post by Looker »

In post 568, Saudade wrote:Hmmmmmmmmmm
Indeed.
In post 570, Riabi wrote:
In post 545, Churros wrote: Anyhow I think Riabi/Anotora unvotes are the worst ones and that's one of the reasons they are top priority in my lynch pool.
You think my unvote on Saudade was bad? Because I'm still voting profii, I haven't changed from there.
:(


Anotora (2):
profii (1 "f", two "i's")
, Saudade
UnaBombah (1):
72offsuit
profii (5):
Egix96, Riabi, Luca Blight, NorwegianboyEE, Looker
NorwegianboyEEE (3):
UnaBombah, Battle Mage, Anotora
Looker (1):
Churros
Riabi (1):
Zantetsu

With 13 Alive, It Takes 7 to Lynch
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #666 (isolation #15) » Fri Apr 10, 2020 2:55 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 593, Riabi wrote:
Null

Looker - Not much content, clearly not trying to actually find scum. Can't tell though if that's because they are actually scum, or just lazy.
I assume this jab is because I tunneled you and called you a weak player. Okay. Fair.
In post 593, Riabi wrote:
Likely scum

Anotora - their ISO is just weak, very little content in there, it feel like they're trying to slip under the radar as much as possible.
Profii - He went on a streak of decent/town looking posts for a bit after he got waggoned, but I still don't buy it. I think that was him trying REAL HARD to not get lynched, because his lynch would mean 33% of his team is dead.
Let's start over. I'll assume you're competent and I'll posit that you can't be wrong on both.

  • @Churros: Scumread myself. Hilarious.
    • If "Anotora/Zant/BP/Looker can't be all town. Ever.", let's figure out who is what.
VOTE: Anotora
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #669 (isolation #16) » Fri Apr 10, 2020 4:43 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 667, Riabi wrote:And here's a perfect example of what I mean, you're voting Anotora based on a post that has no reasoning behind it, and doing so without any reasoning of your own.
Do you have an actual reason for your vote?
Obviously - everyone that voted for Anotora yesterday is dead.
In post 667, Riabi wrote:It's because your ISO was and still is, weak.
Weaker than Anotora's?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #722 (isolation #17) » Sat Apr 11, 2020 3:10 am

Post by Looker »

In post 686, Luca Blight wrote:I am a town neighbor, my neighbor is 72.

What is your result?
Neighbors, not masons?
In post 670, Luca Blight wrote:I’m thinking there’s most likely one scum on the Profii wagon and two off, given how easy a lynch it was. Looker is the only player on the wagon I’m not currently TL’ing.
My play has been admittedly poor.
In post 681, UnaBombaH wrote:Barring a mod-error, he is scum. :]
Firebringer's track record makes me leery of this.
In post 694, 72offsuit wrote: Looker

Scummy in that he mostly fluff posts, almost no elaboration regarding reasons for votes
...
Scum read the scummiest looking town player that others were already voting.
Fair.

  • @NorwegianboyEE: "Deflection much?" Is that the best you can do?
  • @Battle Mage: I have no way to prove that I didn't.
    • Also, does meta mean 'read' to you or are you actually looking at some of my old games?
  • @Norway: Not Una/Looker - Anotora/NorwegianboyEE/Riabi
    • Also, Una fakeclaiming to discredit a piss-poor push on me is ridiculous. That would be an idiotic tactic, and I think that that was a throw-off conspiracy from you. As scum or town, I'm questioning whether you're even trying.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #835 (isolation #18) » Sat Apr 11, 2020 1:47 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 729, Zantetsu wrote:
In post 436, Zantetsu wrote:You will see that as
Una is concentrating on profii
, he is signalling that he knows something about profii that the rest of us do not.
Una
is

c
oncentrating
o
n
p
rofii


Una is cop
I'm lost. You knew that Una was a cop and crumbed it? How and why?
In post 740, Battle Mage wrote:Last night I investigated Zantetsu and he came up positive. Given the claims and his reaction seems pretty unlikely he is a neighbour/mason, so he must be scum.

Vote: Zantetsu
:cop:
Who's all fighting here? Is it just BM vs Zantetsu? Also, Norway vs UnaBombah? Who's on who's side so I can make a decision.
In post 742, Riabi wrote:Agreed, and I think this kind of puts us in a holding pattern for the mod to confirm whether or not there was an error, doesn't it?
Does this mean that the game comes down to setup spec and mechanics? Was someone's cover blown?
In post 750, Battle Mage wrote:Egix96 is worth a read in light of Zantetsu-scum.
Is Egix even still in this game?
In post 754, Battle Mage wrote:I read a bunch of your old games... :lol:
I'm sorry you had to go through all that. I promise I'm trying to be better.
In post 782, UnaBombaH wrote:
In post 732, Zantetsu wrote:But then it doesn't seem possible that town!Una actually is simple neopolitan who got a
+
In post 733, Zantetsu wrote:Whoops ignore the last sentence of my last post, it was some garbage that I accidentally left in when writing my post.
Seems like a potential PT-slip from scum. :lol:
What's the slip? I don't get it.
In post 804, UnaBombaH wrote:
In post 800, Battle Mage wrote:So you're saying Luca might not be scum after all? As he has claimed a non-vanilla townie role!
All we know for a fact is that he is in a PT, and he is not a Vanilla
TOWNIE
.
I don't think neighbors count as vanilla.
In post 808, Zantetsu wrote:Like, I play in the normal queue to avoid this stupid bullshit.
Most of this has gone over my head.

  • I wish Norway would put some effort into this game.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #925 (isolation #19) » Sun Apr 12, 2020 12:09 am

Post by Looker »

In post 838, Riabi wrote:I really hope he meant that sarcastically, because a request like that, coming from him, is pretty out of line if he's sincere.
:shifty:
In post 849, Egix96 wrote:Sorry Looker, I'm here now and catching up.
A vote would be a great apology.

  • WHEN ARE WE GETTING PRODS FOR CHURROS/ANOTORA?

  • Do better. You know who you are.
    Spoiler:
    It's Norway. I'm talking to Norway. :lol: But I'm joking
    Or am I?
    :lol:

  • @Luca: Out of "Looker, Churros, Egix, Anotora, 72.", I'll give you Anotora (if she ever has to post again).
    • Also, I wasn't trying to rolefish - I was just questioning why you didn't immediately suspect 72 if you're town and a neighbor, but you two aren't masons
  • I claim the ultimate power role: Ungated VT
    • This isn't really that fun anymore. Nice work, Norway.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #941 (isolation #20) » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:07 am

Post by Looker »

I didn't start it; you did. But okay.

VOTE: Riabi
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #952 (isolation #21) » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:16 am

Post by Looker »

.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #976 (isolation #22) » Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:20 am

Post by Looker »

In post 956, 72offsuit wrote:wtf. You say you are a Simple Combined Neapolitan
doctor
, not a Simple Combined Neapolitan
cop
???????
Then why did Zantetsu crumb Una being a cop?
In post 961, 72offsuit wrote:
In post 853, Luca Blight wrote:
In post 743, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Zantetsu should claim. In fact i’m starting to wonder if a mass claim wouød be best at this point. Then we can do setup analyzis and find out who is the most believable.
Encourages a mass-claim, which is just scummy as fuck when someone has just claimed a guilty result. Only scum could benefit from a mass-claim at this point.
Agreed.
At what post did we pass this point? Because Luca asked me to claim.
In post 970, 72offsuit wrote:I think Luca is probs town.
Same, which is why his vote on me is so irksome.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #980 (isolation #23) » Sun Apr 12, 2020 6:15 am

Post by Looker »

In post 977, Riabi wrote:UNVOTE: Looker
Still completely useless, IMO, but, without a doubt not the scummiest player today.

Currently, I'm flip flopping in my head about whether or not Norwe or Zan is the best lynch today. I think the case against Zan has been well stated, and doesn't need repeating here. Norwegian just seems too eager to move quickly today, and I wonder if that's not just scum finding a good (fake) case against a townie and trying to get a fast lynch going before it can be too closely examined. I look forward to hearing from Zan again, as well as the others who haven't posted today.
Why would you pit Norway vs Zantetsu as opposed to Zantetsu vs Battle Mage?

Yours truly,
Useless Player
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1017 (isolation #24) » Sun Apr 12, 2020 1:03 pm

Post by Looker »

Egix claimed friendly neighbor
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1126 (isolation #25) » Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:16 pm

Post by Looker »

  • @Zant: I get it - I'm a little bit clueless, but you have to admit: some of this bullshit y'all are trying is utterly ridiculous
  • What's the likelihood of 72 replacing because he was caught scum?
  • @Churros: Not one scum in Looker/Anotora - one scum in Riabi/Anotora
  • @Danyboy: The scumteam is Zant/72offsuit (aka
    you
    )/Riabi
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1154 (isolation #26) » Wed Apr 15, 2020 9:08 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1134, Riabi wrote:Please don't, not yet. We should wait at least until we hear from every slot before we hammer someone on day 2.
At what point will you find it more tactically advantageous to bus your partner? Do you know how bad this makes your team look? One self-votes, one replaces out, and one blatantly stalls. This isn't looking good.
In post 1153, Zantetsu wrote:Someone stop this merry go round, I want to get off.
Give your partners permission to bus you.

  • @Luca: You can't confirm me, I'm the gingerbread man.
  • @Norway: Too clueless to be scum is a poor defense.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1198 (isolation #27) » Sat Apr 18, 2020 3:05 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1191, Egix96 wrote:That is what I did, yes.
So your towniness is contingent upon Churros's towniness? Or is it the other way around?

VOTE: Riabi Why did you avoid Zantetsu's wagon?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1336 (isolation #28) » Sun Apr 19, 2020 1:15 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 1200, Riabi wrote:I didn't avoid anything. I thought I made my thought process clear. I wanted to wait until at least every slot had had a chance to claim before killing Zant. I would have been happy to vote for him once that happened.
Now that two scum are dead and I can't possibly be your buddy, I feel comfortable publicly townreading you.
In post 1221, Eve wrote:norwee and battle mage seem like trustworthy individuals
Battle Mage yes (for the most part), Norwee no
In post 1223, Eve wrote:some of those Riabi-Zentetsu interactions look almost too obvious but i've learnt my lesson from yesterday

VOTE: Riabi
Riabi is mislynch bait
In post 1324, Eve wrote:i have information to share but want to go after Riabi/Looker
Feel free; I went forever pages ago. Somebody put me in a neighborhood with Eve, though.

  • I'm curious what took Norway from a townread of me to me being guaranteed scum.
  • Churros suspected me for not engaging in setup spec and for referring to Saudade's NK, which could've been a kill to frame Anotora; however, I'm supposed to accept that his NK wasn't meant to frame me. I was just kept alive to tunnel Riabi anyway.
  • @Norway:
    • Your modified locktown should read: Battle Mage/Riabi/Luca Blight (maybe Egix)
    • I posit that you killed Churros to frame me and are already lining Battle Mage up to be a mislynch by buddying him while simultaneously calling him scummy (He's understandably not very good)
    • I also find it cute that you added the 'justification' for your vote ten minutes after making it
WIFOM NK is weak

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

Regardless of bussing, he shouldn't make it to lylo
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1373 (isolation #29) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 12:22 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1339, Eve wrote:i targeted Churros two nights ago - we had this plan in the PT where i would post "i wish i had a dayvig" if i succeeded on Looker and "it's a good day for a lynching" if i failed on Looker but alas he died :(
It sucks how convenient that is.
In post 1340, Eve wrote:my predecessor targeted Saudade night 1 and failed
Did it fail because Saudade died?
Saudade was JK
In post 1343, Riabi wrote:Ok, thank you. I get that now... I agree then, the likelyhood that Looker is town just shot up a whole lot. But, that doesn't confirm your alignment at all, correct? You could still be scum.
I think Eve's role was supposed to have been confirmed by Egix's role. I don't know how, though, because I think Friendly Neighbor just sends a letter that says "I'm town". Eve asking "How did you know I'm scum" is bizarre, though.
In post 1344, Eve wrote:wait how did you know i was scum?
In post 1345, Eve wrote:yes i could be a scum neighbouriser - this doesn't confirm me
These two posts in succession are horribly incriminating/skeevy

  • @NorwegianboyEE:
    • Responses like this don't really help anybody and make you look ridiculous. So much
      effort
      ... Then you immediately 180; all that false conviction
    • Also, how can you preemptively OMGUS me? You suspect me for voting you despite it being after you said you suspected and voted me...? You're voting me off of reasons/actions
      you're
      committing
  • I don't know how Eve's role is cleared by Egix's. I get the other way around, though.
If I'd just woken up a
liiittle
bit earlier
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1389 (isolation #30) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:43 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1376, Eve wrote:what do you guys think of my universe brain plan?
I think you're a scum neighborizer who admitted to being scum in Post 1344. How do you respond?
In post 1377, Eve wrote:also norwee pushing looker despite the evidence was kind of eh
Maybe Norway is just a poor player who puts in minimal effort?
In post 1386, Eve wrote:VOTE: Riabi
This was L-1. Firebringer's votecount said 5 to lynch, but it's only four - we have seven players left.
In post 1380, Riabi wrote:
In post 1378, Luca Blight wrote:We’re definitely not lynching the Norwegian slot today.
Yeah, why, he's scummy as hell.

VOTE: Norwe
Do you feel he's scummier than Eve/Anotora? Do you feel Egix effectively cleared Eve?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1390 (isolation #31) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:47 am

Post by Looker »

Speaking of "opportunistic" - Eve is exploiting the fact that Egix and NorwegianboyEE can't unvote to secure a quicklynch of Riabi
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1417 (isolation #32) » Wed Apr 22, 2020 8:37 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1408, Eve wrote:but but that was a joke Luca...

it's okay i survived one day phase without being lynched which is all i was aiming for really
I wish there was more context to this - you make it sound like scum that's given up.
In post 1416, Riabi wrote:I'm comfortable with that. I'll admit, I noticed her and thought it might be a scumslip, but, I wanted to see other reactions to it.

VOTE: Eve.
What would be the point of reaction-testing if she doesn't have any partners?

  • @Battle Mage: You being PT Cop is why I'm not excluding scum neighborizer. And also, I assume a single-man PT still counts as a PT?
VOTE: Eve
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1425 (isolation #33) » Sat Apr 25, 2020 1:56 am

Post by Looker »

  • @BM: What did the Mod say?
VOTE: Bitmap What do you make of all this?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1452 (isolation #34) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:17 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1428, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Looker
How is it opportunistic when I've been campaigning for Anotora for forever? Either way...

...no, you.
VOTE REDACTED
In post 1429, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1425, Looker wrote:
  • @BM: What did the Mod say?
VOTE: Bitmap What do you make of all this?
Ah I didn't ask! I'll ask now...
Did you get an answer?
In post 1450, Bitmap wrote:VOTE: Battle Mage

1) Why would the neighbor die when Looker got mech cleared according to you? There's far more incentive to kill the mechanical clear.
2) You lied about the cop role b/c it was a safe hedge in a game full of neighbors.
3) You're trying to line up lynches since yesterday and Riabi was correct about you.
Man...if Norway had just put in a little more effort into this game...
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1453 (isolation #35) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:18 am

Post by Looker »

I'm going to vote Battle Mage solely for not using voting tags
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1462 (isolation #36) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:31 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1459, Battle Mage wrote:
In post 1453, Looker wrote:I'm going to vote Battle Mage solely for not using voting tags
:lol: The sad thing is, that still wouldn't be our worst defeat in the past week.
:lol: Fair. Fuck you.

Answer Bitmap's question lol
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1468 (isolation #37) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:43 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1465, Battle Mage wrote: :lol: I can't answer his question really - I can only point to what's happened in the game! In the context of the roles we've had in this game, a roleblocker who can block and kill in the same night doesn't shock me. :lol:

What would shock me slightly more is the idea that I fake-claimed cop to bus my own partner for no reason on Day 2(?) and then get no further results or value for the entire game. Without being properly confirmed, and with no idea if I'd get counter-claimed or anything. :facepalm:
Yeah, but, I mean...the vote tags...
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1471 (isolation #38) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 10:50 am

Post by Looker »

Okay. Time for me to go home.

VOTE: Bitmap

I'm biased by how much I despise Battle Mage and may have overcorrected.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1509 (isolation #39) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:31 am

Post by Looker »

Wow, you were scum? gg
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1512 (isolation #40) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:33 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1500, Zantetsu wrote:Looker you here? This is bji. I just created my first alt account - Zantetsu - just so I can have this cool avatar. Anyway, what happened to you this game Looker? In our previous game, you were not stellar, but you had reads that made sense and you played OK. What were you even DOING this game?
I haven't been paying attention to this site. I should. But I haven't. Sorry to...disappoint...? But I can't imagine expectations were that high. I wish Norway would've put in more effort, though
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1516 (isolation #41) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:38 am

Post by Looker »

The sh** wasn't intentional - I thought I was right. Clearly this game requires more effort than I thought.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1519 (isolation #42) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:40 am

Post by Looker »

I didn't mean to hurt your feelings, though, Zantetsu. It wasn't my intention to sh** on something you enjoy.

p-edit: That's hindsight.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1520 (isolation #43) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:40 am

Post by Looker »

p-p-edit: I fault no one for their emotions.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1523 (isolation #44) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:45 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1521, Zantetsu wrote:Well Looker I harbor no ill will and I know that expecting anything from anybody on a site that people play for free and with no obligations is pretty foolish. But I will probably keep doing to because I am a fool.
If it means anything to you, having you hate my avatar is important to me. Normally, I would hide and lie and deflect, but I think it's important that you see my face and hate me. I also think you shouldn't play any more games with me.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1528 (isolation #45) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:49 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1524, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not even mad at you for making the wrong choice in LYLO Looker. It's your shit attitude.
Sarcastically ridiculing people who put effort into the game, and then ironically you lose the game because you didn't put in a slight bit of effort at reading into Bitmap's arguments.
I thought you were a liar. I egged you on emotionally hoping that you would snap and towntell. I looked up Bitmap's claim and the wiki says Multitasking roles are normal. I was wrong.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1532 (isolation #46) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:52 am

Post by Looker »

In post 1529, NorwegianboyEE wrote:zantetsu didn't even say anything about your avatar. Ironically you're doing exactly what you claimed you wouldn't be doing. Lying and deflecting.
By lying/deflecting, I meant changing my avatar or creating an alt
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1533 (isolation #47) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:53 am

Post by Looker »

Was it really just a role pm that was posted/redacted
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1535 (isolation #48) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:56 am

Post by Looker »

I thought the call-out to the mod was a stall tactic. I was wrong.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1537 (isolation #49) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 11:57 am

Post by Looker »

I disagree. I want all the smoke.
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1541 (isolation #50) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 12:01 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 1538, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Are you in reality a masochist?
No; I just understand how important it is to express how they feel. You're disappointed/frustrated, and how you have every right to feel that. You should feel that. Who am I to stifle what you feel?
User avatar
Looker
Looker
the
Stenographer
User avatar
User avatar
Looker
the
Stenographer
Stenographer
Posts: 5304
Joined: February 20, 2009
Pronoun: the

Post Post #1542 (isolation #51) » Mon Apr 27, 2020 12:02 pm

Post by Looker »

In post 1541, Looker wrote:
In post 1538, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Are you in reality a masochist?
No; I just understand how important it is
for people
to express how they feel. You're disappointed/frustrated, and
how
you have every right to feel that. You should feel that. Who am I to stifle what you feel?
Sorry, I'm still at work, lol

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”