Open 778: Nightless Vanilla [Game Over!]


User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12090
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:18 pm

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

Also, she can just attest to that.

Isis, were you being insincere?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:20 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

NorwegianboyEE scum
Firebringer scum
votato scum

Isis town
human town
elements town
Alisae town

everyone else null
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:21 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Tell me about your cycle man read.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:22 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:23 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

(Obviously i have an opinion about your 174, but i'll let Isis speak for herself first.)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:24 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

ABR don't be a dick get in here and tell us your horribly wrong opinions.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:27 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 146, Isis wrote:GREEN CRAYONS YOU ARE 3.14159265% OF WHY I QUEUED FOR THIS GAME U BETTER COME PLAY WITH ME
In post 153, Looker wrote:
In post 146, Isis wrote:GREEN CRAYONS YOU ARE 3.14159265% OF WHY I QUEUED FOR THIS GAME U BETTER COME PLAY WITH ME
SAME! :eek:
Y'all are legally obligated to tell me your main if this is an alt, and if I have ever played with you. Otherwise the FBI will arrest you.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12090
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 4:34 pm

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

Cycle Man

>joins the game, but not really
>says they were asleep but they didn't even follow up

making yourself difficult to read on purpose in a nightless game is scummy to me
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:00 pm

Post by Isis »

This is my main now.
I've never played with you before, you simply have a 2002 join date.
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12090
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:03 pm

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

In post 175, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Isis, were you being insincere?
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:04 pm

Post by Isis »

I was trying to masquerade as an offsite player for the first 3 pages for reactions and memes.
I'm not sure the approach of putting someone at L-1 is refutable as a good strategy, any more than any other approach to RVS, because RVS kind of fundamentally sucks. It's not really a novel concept, only my presentation was novel. ("why did you RVS X" "X already had some votes" is pretty common) So I don't know if I'm "insincere", I think artificially wagoning someone to L-1 is at least tied with other RVS garbage, but I don't feel strongly enough to defend it to humaneatingmonkey for three pages after I've already gotten higher information traction into the game.
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:05 pm

Post by Isis »

pls 4 minutes to compose my thoughts
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:05 pm

Post by Isis »

I don't always respond to things in order, so if I don't say something older right away it doesn't mean I've skipped to-dos
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:07 pm

Post by Isis »

I planned to masquerade as an offsite player before getting my role PM, but came up with everything else after getting my role PM, if you guys want to sort those choices in a valid way
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:08 pm

Post by Isis »

VOTE: Cycle men because Norweescum is likely to reveal all of his teammates and write me poetry
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12090
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:13 pm

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

In post 186, Isis wrote:pls 4 minutes to compose my thoughts
sorry. with how the game going, i thought you were going to ignore me
User avatar
Isis
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
User avatar
User avatar
Isis
she/her, not they
Best in Class
Best in Class
Posts: 11224
Joined: April 6, 2020
Pronoun: she/her, not they
Location: Seattle

Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:15 pm

Post by Isis »

What characteristic of the game made you feel that way?
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12090
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:19 pm

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

lots of players here are straight-up ignoring posts that seem AI to me. for example, votato double-downed that it was still RVS even after I went after him. Also a lot of them have been ignoring my efforts to put this game in a better place. Not just him, but Looker, Cycle Man, and Firebringer. It was kinda annoying.
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
humaneatingmonkey
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12090
Joined: June 7, 2017

Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:20 pm

Post by humaneatingmonkey »

No one has addressed my vote post on votato, and it seems really important that i caught him lying about his motive.
User avatar
votato
votato
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
votato
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4028
Joined: April 17, 2020

Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:24 pm

Post by votato »

In post 171, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Here's mine

Town:
Alisae
Isis
Elements

No reads yet:
Green Crayons
Firebringer
Looker
Deimos27

Scum:
Cycle Men
votato
NorwegianboyEE
why do you TR isis?
User avatar
votato
votato
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
votato
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4028
Joined: April 17, 2020

Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:27 pm

Post by votato »

In post 193, humaneatingmonkey wrote:No one has addressed my vote post on votato, and it seems really important that i caught him lying about his motive.
so you still think my vote was serious? if so, why does that make me scum? do you not understand the memeish nature of the vote?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:30 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 103, votato wrote:oh no. i think that its a dumb plan on its face in terms of doing it explicitly like that. i meant that organic food is a scam. so i guess in a way its because of isis, but more because of your response to what she said.
Who are you talking to here and what vote are you talking about?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
votato
votato
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
votato
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4028
Joined: April 17, 2020

Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:32 pm

Post by votato »

In post 196, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 103, votato wrote:oh no. i think that its a dumb plan on its face in terms of doing it explicitly like that. i meant that organic food is a scam. so i guess in a way its because of isis, but more because of your response to what she said.
Who are you talking to here and what vote are you talking about?
human was challenging me about my vote on him. the plan was ISIS', the vote was my first one, where human had said something like "lets do it the organic way," so I shitposted about organic food and voted him. human seemed to think that it was a serious vote, and that seriously voting him is scummy.
User avatar
votato
votato
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
votato
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4028
Joined: April 17, 2020

Post Post #198 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:35 pm

Post by votato »

here are the relevant posts from my iso (i was too lazy to click through the thread to get human's posts too, but it should be pretty low-effort for you to track).
Spoiler:
In post 38, votato wrote:
In post 36, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
In post 22, Elements wrote:VOTE: humaneatingmonkey
I like this plan
How about we do this thing organically instead? VOTE: Elements
organics are a scam. VOTE: humaneatingmonkey.
In post 100, votato wrote:
In post 99, humaneatingmonkey wrote:why vote me, votato?
it was a pretty obvious rvs vote. ive since moved to a different vote that is very serious, you should ask me about that instead
In post 103, votato wrote:oh no. i think that its a dumb plan on its face in terms of doing it explicitly like that. i meant that organic food is a scam. so i guess in a way its because of isis, but more because of your response to what she said.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #199 (ISO) » Sat May 02, 2020 5:37 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

I mean. I get the vote being RVS

But then you justify it with it being in some way bc of his reaction to Isis, which is not RVS

Do you see the disconnect?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Return to “Completed Open Games”