mini 2140: partition (this is over)

Morning Tweet · Post Post #575 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:32 pm

ABR did u put Adorbs up to this?

in any case i doubt it was staged

Hoctac · Post Post #576 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:33 pm

In post 109, Ame wrote:...I just noticed something lmfao

In post 110, Ame wrote:this has Hoc written all over it xDDD

In post 111, Ame wrote:

yeah this has to be Hoc

This realisation was hilarious lol

It feels really genuine, so either Ame is scum who only realised this at this moment (less likely), or she's town.

Ame · Post Post #577 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:34 pm

Hoc, why were you afraid to answer?

Hoctac · Post Post #578 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:35 pm

I wasn't sure if it was the same as your theory, there was another possibility

Ame · Post Post #579 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:36 pm

What was the other?

Hoctac · Post Post #580 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:36 pm

Also, I think you'll find my pronoun isn't listed under my account name, and I think you should respect that rather than assume

Hoctac · Post Post #581 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:38 pm

Other theories were:

I've played with everyone in Group 1.
The hydra in group 1 is "unlike" the others (weak).

Ame · Post Post #582 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:39 pm

lol sorry Leafeons have a 87.5% male ratio so I was just playing to the odds

Morning Tweet · Post Post #583 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:39 pm

im making another one of these, just because it looks cool. i freely admit that i was half-asleep reading like a lot of the pages besides the last 2

Spoiler: reads

That is wayy too many townleans to be healthy. what is wrong with my scum detector?

Morning Tweet · Post Post #584 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:42 pm

Guys be honest. am i hopeless at scumhunting? Actually i figured it out myself. Yes.

Basically i took my previous townleans, and threw on the new ones, and here we are. I can reread and fix it as long as we arent terminating group #1 right now. Are you guys considering ending group #1 right now, or are we waiting

Hoctac · Post Post #585 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:43 pm

I forgive you, Ame.

Puff, what's your assessment of the current situation? Did we lose or are we all good?

Hoctac · Post Post #586 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:44 pm

In post 584, Morning Tweet wrote:Basically i took my previous townleans, and threw on the new ones, and here we are. I can reread and fix it as long as we arent terminating group #1 right now. Are you guys considering ending group #1 right now, or are we waiting

I'd rather wait. I can still see it being clidd. Also, I want the charmander to come back and start posting.

Adorable · Post Post #587 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:53 pm

In post 585, Hoctac wrote:I forgive you, Ame.

Puff, what's your assessment of the current situation? Did we lose or are we all good?

I counted just now to see how many players voted Group 1 and 6 players voted Group 1. You unvoted and Group 1 now has 5 votes.

Hoctac · Post Post #588 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 7:54 pm

Ok, cool, thanks for checking!

Cat Scratch Fever · Post Post #589 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 8:57 pm

In post 565, Adorable wrote:
In post 551, Hoctac wrote:VOTE: Group 1

gg

i was scum

In post 552, Hoctac wrote:UNVOTE: Group 1
You are crazy! Ame put us at L-1, you hammered and unvoting doesn't count.

Why do you keep dodging hoc’s question?

Cat Scratch Fever · Post Post #590 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 8:59 pm

In post 584, Morning Tweet wrote:Guys be honest. am i hopeless at scumhunting? Actually i figured it out myself. Yes.

Basically i took my previous townleans, and threw on the new ones, and here we are. I can reread and fix it as long as we arent terminating group #1 right now. Are you guys considering ending group #1 right now, or are we waiting

I doubt kanna, raya and d&d is the exact scumteam

I’m not ready to end it

Cat Scratch Fever · Post Post #591 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 9:03 pm

Enomis I see you

Come play!

Cat Scratch Fever · Post Post #592 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 9:21 pm

Spoiler:

Mohab500 · Post Post #593 (ISO) » Wed May 13, 2020 11:46 pm

In post 434, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:
In post 428, Mohab500 wrote:
GROUP 1:

Adorable

Ame

Cat Scratch Fever

Daenerys and Dragons

Hoctac

Kanna

Morning Tweet

Raya36
GROUP 2:

Albert B. Rampage

clidd
GROUP 3:

dsjstr

enomis

Mohab500
Why do you have us as town?

- Daenerys

Ame's posts feel fluid/logical to me, I don't get the impression they're faking their reads/posts at all. So this is just a hunch.
Morning Tweet feels a little... clueless? to me? not in a bad way, I feel the same way usually while playing. I wouldn't assume scum to be this confused.
Cat's posts are a bit similar to Ame's, but I am a little more torn on how much I agree with their reads.
Your posts don't really give me a 'I am finding scum today!' vibe like how I usually would assign town, but I get the feeling it's less about you being scum 'faking' scumreads but more about, you not caring if we actually find scum, which does feel kind of weird I know, but, as with all my reads, it's really just a hunch and I am just looking for anything to write here.

Mohab500 · Post Post #594 (ISO) » Thu May 14, 2020 12:17 am

In post 452, clidd wrote:
In post 428, Mohab500 wrote:
GROUP 1:

Adorable

Ame

Cat Scratch Fever

Daenerys and Dragons

Hoctac

Kanna

Morning Tweet

Raya36
GROUP 2:

Albert B. Rampage

clidd
GROUP 3:

dsjstr

enomis

Mohab500
Mohab, could you explain what you found scummy about my slot ? I feel like my eyes will end up ignoring your posts if I don’t understand how you’re interpreting group 2 individually.

Clidd, I don't really think I am getting much from what you write. I'll admit it could very well just be the meta, and I only looked at your meta briefly, but it seems a little excessive this game. 153 for example, this post means nothing and gets across nothing, you write way too much and 'analyze' way too much for it to have this much holes. 182 is another one where it seems deliberately made to be confusing, meaningless, full of contradictions or otherwise just full of random assumptions meant to mislead us. So yeah, another hunch.

enomis · Post Post #595 (ISO) » Thu May 14, 2020 1:07 am

Heya Guys.

enomis · Post Post #596 (ISO) » Thu May 14, 2020 1:15 am

In post 134, dsjstr wrote:
In post 98, Hoctac wrote:Fair point, but see 81, Doro.

You find anyone scummy so far? I'm pretty sure clidd and Ame are conspiring in the other corner.
Think I saw someone slip but I'll have to get back to you on that one.

If you are talking about my post where i am calculating the win rate and calculated for scum win rate instead of town. It was because I was too immerse in my calculations.

Other than that, think what you will if you are referring to my post.

enomis · Post Post #597 (ISO) » Thu May 14, 2020 2:45 am

In post 46, enomis wrote:
In post 41, Ame wrote:What do you mean by play normal?
I meant scum hunt normally. And come to a consensus about groups late in the day based on who you scumread.

I officially backtrack this stance.
anyway, I think d&d and mohab is town.

And also, I don't really think I am lynchbait. Don't think I get lynched much and I haven't been at this site for 3 years, so don't think anyone meta'ed me.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #598 (ISO) » Thu May 14, 2020 2:49 am

In post 536, Morning Tweet wrote:Should i try to read more closely into this game, or is that a giant waste of time when i can just vote group one?

OH NO
im starting to become albert

Albert you have to marry me if i vote group one and it turns out that it isn't 1/1/1. deal?

Yes, it's a deal. But if you are scum, our contract is cancelled.

enomis · Post Post #599 (ISO) » Thu May 14, 2020 2:51 am

Anyway, the fact that there hasn't been a quick hammer on group 1 means

1) At least 2 scum are in group 1
OR
2) 2 scums are already voting, thus scum cannot quick hammer to win. (But this is not possible because only ABR is voting group 1)

Thus, 2 Scums is at least in group 1.

VOTE: group 1