Mini Normal 2128: Normal Mafia - Game Over!

[Drew-Sta]

Bambi - who is your vote? I feel like you just sheep.

[Bambi Jay]

Considering I've already been prodded twice, yeah I understand how you got that in your head, but i did comment on it earlier who I would vote. Hasn't changed.

My god Trollie your comebacks already make it worse. I just feel the urge to vote for you or Mala and take my chances there. Drew Seems obvious, and I trust Bob slightly more then you 2. Gera is also townie. So.

Trollie is it with Mala being my second choice.

[geraintm]

Bob. Weekends I dont have the time to answer long threads.yesterday inthought itbwas trollie, with I believe insaidndrew second most likely. I voted trollie then as I wanted them lynched, I knew I didnt want to lynch Danny.there was no one else I felt strongly enough to want to lynch.
Why you asking for my scum team today is a no go, I dont work like that.

[geraintm]

I know today I will not vote trollie. I think I lean drew as anti town. Havent gone through the rest enough to out everyone on a side

[bob3141]

UNVOTE:

[geraintm]

God just read back my post. It is impossible to read. Sorry

[TheTrollie]

im confused. everyone is claiming VT but me?

What about mala?

[Drew-Sta]

I need to iso a few people...

[bob3141]

is anyone actual going to posts?

If we aint goign to lynch or talk today. Shouldnt we just go for no lynch now rather than stretching this day out

[Drew-Sta]

Can you explain again how a no lynch helps?

[bob3141]

Its just that evens are better for scum. And scum choose to no kill so lynch today is actualy in their interest.

While nolynch atleast forces scum to remove one player.


drew are you saying you dont want to no lynch

[bob3141]

if we look at the reasons scum might have no lynced.

a- the town could have been split and scum were happy with repeat of yesterday
b- scum didnt want to nk a potential mislynch
c- scum didnt want to weaken a mislynch (e.g. killing players they thought they could buddy or swing to vote with them)
d- or nk could incriminate them.

[geraintm]

VOTE: no lynch

[Malakittens]

Bob I believe is town

[Drew-Sta]

Its just that evens are better for scum. And scum choose to no kill so lynch today is actualy in their interest.

While nolynch atleast forces scum to remove one player.


drew are you saying you dont want to no lynch

Not necessarily. Just not sure what it achieves.

We’re basically giving scum a free kick with no trail to follow for a day.

It doesn’t seem wise but I accept the logic.

[geraintm]

today we have found out some more info, more than we had at the start. some things will be confirmed over night. I am happy doing the opposite of what drew wants to do

[Bambi Jay]

The only info we got is the 1 weird claim though?

[bob3141]

it is difficult claim to work out if it fits too

we know we have simple rolestopper.

Combined with neigbourizers espresso was protective/vanillacop


if trollie is true then that pretty much means he is straight cop.

now the simple part of rolestopper can be assumed to be there to weaken the mason/neighbourizer combo.

[bob3141]

it all comes down to the fact that half of espresso and all of trollies claimed roll is determined by them interacting with the same players as the masons

[Drew-Sta]

That’s the key question though. Did the masons bring in mafia to their neighbourhoods. The odds are yes.

[TheTrollie]

My roll has NOTHING to do with my interactions with my neighborhood.

Bambi is in a different neighborhood than me.

I'm gonna target uhhh...drew tonight.

hypothetically my role is useless bc everyone else claimed VT but whatever. thats what im gonna do.

[TheTrollie]

I'll vote no lynch soon

[TheTrollie]

Its just that evens are better for scum. And scum choose to no kill so lynch today is actualy in their interest.

While nolynch atleast forces scum to remove one player.


drew are you saying you dont want to no lynch

Not necessarily. Just not sure what it achieves.

We’re basically giving scum a free kick with no trail to follow for a day.

It doesn’t seem wise but I accept the logic.

Today is mylo. There are 6 players left (4 town, 2 scum most likely). We have a 2/3 (66%) chance of lynching town and losing the game.
If we no lynch we go into tomorrow with 5 left (3 town, 2 scum). We will have a 3/5 (60%) chance of lynching town and losing the game.

Our odds are better tomorrow. Thats why we no lynch.

[Drew-Sta]

Its just that evens are better for scum. And scum choose to no kill so lynch today is actualy in their interest.

While nolynch atleast forces scum to remove one player.


drew are you saying you dont want to no lynch

Not necessarily. Just not sure what it achieves.

We’re basically giving scum a free kick with no trail to follow for a day.

It doesn’t seem wise but I accept the logic.

Today is mylo. There are 6 players left (4 town, 2 scum most likely). We have a 2/3 (66%) chance of lynching town and losing the game.
If we no lynch we go into tomorrow with 5 left (3 town, 2 scum). We will have a 3/5 (60%) chance of lynching town and losing the game.

Our odds are better tomorrow. Thats why we no lynch.

Yeah, ok. Presented like that it is clear. There's just something about it which bugs me.

[bob3141]

My roll has NOTHING to do with my interactions with my neighborhood.

Bambi is in a different neighborhood than me.

I'm gonna target uhhh...drew tonight.

hypothetically my role is useless bc everyone else claimed VT but whatever. thats what im gonna do.

your claimed role is disloyal rolestopper.

We have two roles that it can stop. they were the twin mason/neighbourizers

If you targted the same player as one of the masons and that player was scum. The masons action woudl fail. If town the neighbourhood increases, creating a clear

Thus its an indirect cop. That is enabled by the two masons


were you in allo neighbourhood. And what was your read on teh players in that hood?