Your neglect is noted.In post 3697, Nahdia wrote:wagons, pressure, cases, anything really.In post 3679, Quick wrote:I don't understand the question. What exactly do you expect me to get out of it? TownIn post 3678, Nahdia wrote:and you have what to show for it?isnot really cooperating but that is mostly due to all my TRs SRing each other.
That could possibly be fair. I might be wrong on you and yes that would make me a bad town leader in your eyes, but also you haven't answered my question.In post 3699, Quick wrote:I think you are being a terrible town leader, how does that sound?In post 3693, OkaPoka wrote:Quick, if you believe Jake is town. And let's assume you are town from your PoV. Do you really think that nero/TSE are town? You think its possible that four townies collectively shit the bed and sided with a lie and none of them did their due diligence?
It isn't a contradiction because we didn't ask the same damn question.In post 3695, OkaPoka wrote:Yeah except now you are saying its not a contradiction? Or are you maintaining that Voted is a liar?
I'll post this and let you think about it...In post 3697, Nahdia wrote:wagons, pressure, cases, anything really.In post 3679, Quick wrote:I don't understand the question. What exactly do you expect me to get out of it? TownIn post 3678, Nahdia wrote:and you have what to show for it?isnot really cooperating but that is mostly due to all my TRs SRing each other.
Maybe you are just wrong and not them? How does that sound?In post 3701, OkaPoka wrote:That could possibly be fair. I might be wrong on you and yes that would make me a bad town leader in your eyes, but also you haven't answered my question.In post 3699, Quick wrote:I think you are being a terrible town leader, how does that sound?In post 3693, OkaPoka wrote:Quick, if you believe Jake is town. And let's assume you are town from your PoV. Do you really think that nero/TSE are town? You think its possible that four townies collectively shit the bed and sided with a lie and none of them did their due diligence?
Except you voted vote and called him out saying Bullshit. Is it not hard to understand that to everyone else, it looks like you two are in contradiction? Like please, I just want to know what's up with you. Has your opinion on Voted changed?In post 3702, Jake The Wolfie wrote:It isn't a contradiction because we didn't ask the same damn question.In post 3695, OkaPoka wrote:Yeah except now you are saying its not a contradiction? Or are you maintaining that Voted is a liar?
It's like saying that 1+1=10 is both wrong and right without asking what base we're in.
I might be wrong sure, but whats the alternatively explanation to my proposed two worlds? The last world is you four all scum.In post 3704, Quick wrote:Maybe you are just wrong and not them? How does that sound?In post 3701, OkaPoka wrote:That could possibly be fair. I might be wrong on you and yes that would make me a bad town leader in your eyes, but also you haven't answered my question.In post 3699, Quick wrote:I think you are being a terrible town leader, how does that sound?In post 3693, OkaPoka wrote:Quick, if you believe Jake is town. And let's assume you are town from your PoV. Do you really think that nero/TSE are town? You think its possible that four townies collectively shit the bed and sided with a lie and none of them did their due diligence?
I will not be sheeping you for the rest of the game and for the forseeable future.In post 3705, OkaPoka wrote:Except you voted vote and called him out saying Bullshit. Is it not hard to understand that to everyone else, it looks like you two are in contradiction? Like please, I just want to know what's up with you. Has your opinion on Voted changed?In post 3702, Jake The Wolfie wrote:It isn't a contradiction because we didn't ask the same damn question.In post 3695, OkaPoka wrote:Yeah except now you are saying its not a contradiction? Or are you maintaining that Voted is a liar?
It's like saying that 1+1=10 is both wrong and right without asking what base we're in.
My vote hasn't changed because I don't care right now.In post 3705, OkaPoka wrote:Except you voted vote and called him out saying Bullshit. Is it not hard to understand that to everyone else, it looks like you two are in contradiction? Like please, I just want to know what's up with you. Has your opinion on Voted changed?In post 3702, Jake The Wolfie wrote:It isn't a contradiction because we didn't ask the same damn question.In post 3695, OkaPoka wrote:Yeah except now you are saying its not a contradiction? Or are you maintaining that Voted is a liar?
It's like saying that 1+1=10 is both wrong and right without asking what base we're in.
What stake do you have in a vote on Voted?In post 3698, OkaPoka wrote: Jake is maintaining that him and Voted are in contradiction. He hasn't taken his Voted vote back this entire time.
You are not considering you are wrong here...In post 3706, OkaPoka wrote:I might be wrong sure, but whats the alternatively explanation to my proposed two worlds? The last world is you four all scum.In post 3704, Quick wrote:Maybe you are just wrong and not them? How does that sound?In post 3701, OkaPoka wrote:That could possibly be fair. I might be wrong on you and yes that would make me a bad town leader in your eyes, but also you haven't answered my question.In post 3699, Quick wrote:I think you are being a terrible town leader, how does that sound?In post 3693, OkaPoka wrote:Quick, if you believe Jake is town. And let's assume you are town from your PoV. Do you really think that nero/TSE are town? You think its possible that four townies collectively shit the bed and sided with a lie and none of them did their due diligence?
Those exact words plsIn post 3710, Hoctac wrote:Jake, could you ask the mod "" and report back to us?Do infected people know they've been infected?
Because its evident that Jake still thinks there is a contradiction no matter what he says.In post 3711, davesaz wrote:What stake do you have in a vote on Voted?In post 3698, OkaPoka wrote: Jake is maintaining that him and Voted are in contradiction. He hasn't taken his Voted vote back this entire time.
I am trying to not be insulting... but you are just plain wrong and completely biased here...In post 3709, OkaPoka wrote:But that's twice you've dodged my question and tried to answer a question with a question.
Oooh, thrice. Still have yet to see engagement with the actual question.
I literally presented two worlds where all four of you are town or at least one of you are scum. ?In post 3712, Quick wrote:You are not considering you are wrong here...In post 3706, OkaPoka wrote:I might be wrong sure, but whats the alternatively explanation to my proposed two worlds? The last world is you four all scum.In post 3704, Quick wrote:Maybe you are just wrong and not them? How does that sound?In post 3701, OkaPoka wrote:That could possibly be fair. I might be wrong on you and yes that would make me a bad town leader in your eyes, but also you haven't answered my question.In post 3699, Quick wrote:I think you are being a terrible town leader, how does that sound?In post 3693, OkaPoka wrote:Quick, if you believe Jake is town. And let's assume you are town from your PoV. Do you really think that nero/TSE are town? You think its possible that four townies collectively shit the bed and sided with a lie and none of them did their due diligence?
All four of us being Scum is bat shit crazy. Why does there NEED to be Scum in that group? How about you explain that... thoroughly.
No, that has not been demonstrated.In post 3714, OkaPoka wrote:Because its evident that Jake still thinks there is a contradiction no matter what he says.In post 3711, davesaz wrote:What stake do you have in a vote on Voted?In post 3698, OkaPoka wrote: Jake is maintaining that him and Voted are in contradiction. He hasn't taken his Voted vote back this entire time.
Are you saying here that 3708 wasn't an answer? The 2nd sentence looks like a pedit.In post 3709, OkaPoka wrote:But that's twice you've dodged my question and tried to answer a question with a question.
Oooh, thrice. Still have yet to see engagement with the actual question.
In post 3694, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In a world where I didn't lie, my actions are completely justified. I saw a contradiction and I announced it.In post 3689, OkaPoka wrote:Jake you forget that you took initiative in pushing voted for his question to the mod. It is you who found a contradiction and pushed it, not him. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Except that Jake is Scum in all your worlds, right? Well if he's Town, then you just shit the bed with your analysis of what is going on here.In post 3716, OkaPoka wrote:I literally presented two worlds where all four of you are town or at least one of you are scum. ?In post 3712, Quick wrote:You are not considering you are wrong here...In post 3706, OkaPoka wrote:I might be wrong sure, but whats the alternatively explanation to my proposed two worlds? The last world is you four all scum.In post 3704, Quick wrote:Maybe you are just wrong and not them? How does that sound?In post 3701, OkaPoka wrote:That could possibly be fair. I might be wrong on you and yes that would make me a bad town leader in your eyes, but also you haven't answered my question.In post 3699, Quick wrote:I think you are being a terrible town leader, how does that sound?In post 3693, OkaPoka wrote:Quick, if you believe Jake is town. And let's assume you are town from your PoV. Do you really think that nero/TSE are town? You think its possible that four townies collectively shit the bed and sided with a lie and none of them did their due diligence?
All four of us being Scum is bat shit crazy. Why does there NEED to be Scum in that group? How about you explain that... thoroughly.
I see no reason to. Either I find that all the people saying yes are right, or I find that they were wrong and I get called a liar even after I townflip. All I'd be doing is wasting time.In post 3710, Hoctac wrote:Jake, could you ask the mod "Do infected people know they've been infected?" and report back to us?
In post 3720, OkaPoka wrote:In post 3694, Jake The Wolfie wrote:In a world where I didn't lie, my actions are completely justified. IIn post 3689, OkaPoka wrote:Jake you forget that you took initiative in pushing voted for his question to the mod. It is you who found a contradiction and pushed it, not him. You can't have your cake and eat it too.a contradiction and I announced it.saw
I've repeatedly given him chances to change his vote and he hasn't, its a shitty response but whatever. I don't like it, maybe he's being honest but if we set the bar that low where we can forgive play of I don't care enough to scumhunt when he's criticizing us for not scumhunting, then fuck it, good luck.In post 3719, davesaz wrote:Are you saying here that 3708 wasn't an answer? The 2nd sentence looks like a pedit.In post 3709, OkaPoka wrote:But that's twice you've dodged my question and tried to answer a question with a question.
Oooh, thrice. Still have yet to see engagement with the actual question.
If it wasn't the answer then what's the question?