In post 108, Kilgamayan wrote:Posts so far have given me a sense of playing a "safely helpful" game; decent post volume but all of the game content is focused around trying to solve the role puzzle or info dropping (such as details about a previous game that used this setup), which doesn't require any real alignment-related effort. Basically active lurking.
checks kilgamayan's iso
no setup related efforting
no allignment spewing or solving related efforting
is voting us for efforting and calling it active lurking
@DKKoba, I don't really get what you're saying about Holden? Do jokes count as WIFOM? and why am I not in the same level of consideration? Heck, I was the one who brought up the two of us being scum together.
As for the PR talk, I'm going to sit out. I took a semester of clowning at community college, all this math is way above my head. I'll just go with whatever the town consensus is.
P-edit: You and I can RVS as long as you like, but if you change your avatar you're dead to me.
In post 119, Hoctac wrote:Holden, could I ask why you use "->" rather than ">" or bullet points which can be accessed using BBcode? I found your choice peculiar.
First off, do I look like a programmer? bbcode is too much work and I can't be arsed to actually learn how to use it. I probably will never host my devious bastard games like "Mod's Are Vig's" where everyone kisses the Mods' asses trying not to get vig because I do not know how to format VCs.
Okay, I believe you! After briefly checking your meta, I can verify you haven't modded any games.
In post 108, Kilgamayan wrote:Posts so far have given me a sense of playing a "safely helpful" game; decent post volume but all of the game content is focused around trying to solve the role puzzle or info dropping (such as details about a previous game that used this setup), which doesn't require any real alignment-related effort. Basically active lurking.
checks kilgamayan's iso
no setup related efforting
no allignment spewing or solving related efforting
is voting us for efforting and calling it active lurking
okaay
yo datisi is it ok if I start tunneling this?
-Ico
There's been no analysis shared at all regarding this current game from your posts, only previous experiences and setup stuff. Active lurking.
Ceejay is only gonna get better but his logic can be on the wrong side of lazy logic sometimes. ~the worst
I'm not sure, I'm still getting my bearings in this game. Some people seem very friendly but I'm not sure if being friendly makes someone town or mafia.
Also, I liked the person who made the first push against Night 3 Roses. For making the push itself; I think it was productive and useful of them!
I am okay with it given I felt worse about you them when I posted. It helps that 158 is pretty much exactly the response I intended to give to 150, which itself feels like a disingenuous response. Particularly since (a) it doesn't make an attempt to address why my accusation is wrong, and (b) it doesn't differentiate between our post volumes. I would say someone who doesn't post a lot but offers alignment opinions when they do is townier than someone that does post a lot but doesn't offer alignment opinions, regardless of the actual content of those posts.
I am okay with it given I felt worse about you them when I posted. It helps that 158 is pretty much exactly the response I intended to give to 150, which itself feels like a disingenuous response. Particularly since (a) it doesn't make an attempt to address why my accusation is wrong, and (b) it doesn't differentiate between our post volumes. I would say someone who doesn't post a lot but offers alignment opinions when they do is townier than someone that does post a lot but doesn't offer alignment opinions, regardless of the actual content of those posts.
than him when I posted. It helps that 158 is pretty much exactly the response I intended to give to 150, which itself feels like a disingenuous response. Particularly since (a) it doesn't make an attempt to address why my accusation is wrong, and (b) it doesn't differentiate between our post volumes. I would say someone who doesn't post a lot but offers alignment opinions when they do is townier than someone that does post a lot but doesn't offer alignment opinions, regardless of the actual content of those posts.
your own iso up to that point was 4 posts, all of which were either setup talk or non-game related, pot-calling-kettle-black. before i fell asleep, the only discussion so far was Setup Spec, the few KobavTux posts, and some people wanting to vote Holden (which I actually did ask about but got ignored).
@CJ (is that okay?) are you still scum reading Holden? Why/why not? What's your goal with this wagon hoping? Your votes (or unmoved votes) look opportunistic.
Also, Clidd has yet to make an appearance, is that normal for them?
@CJ (is that okay?) are you still scum reading Holden? Why/why not? What's your goal with this wagon hoping? Your votes (or unmoved votes) look opportunistic.
Also, Clidd has yet to make an appearance, is that normal for them?
And where has Enomis gone?
To answer your first question, I wanted to move it from you!
The second question isn't directed at me, so I won't answer it.
I'm not sure. I think he's usually more engaged by this point but I haven't checked his meta to answer this question.
