In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?
I agree with this.
In post 25, Mohab500 wrote:That's such a weird way of looking at it: I am proposing we lynch him in case we have no other reads, I'd rather mislynch a Jester than deal with a headache claiming to be a Jester the entire game, especially if we have no better leads. But I am not adverse to lynching someone else if we have to, I guess.
In post 75, Sakura Hana wrote:It's also instaloss coz no one would lynch the Jester and the Jester wouldnt lynch scum.
I know it's early but entertaining the Jester discussion is bizarre.
87 is the most strange I've seen in a while too.
In post 105, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 82, Mohab500 wrote:Norwegian, thoughts on this Jester talk? What do you think should be done if there is a Jester?
I think jester talk is fine because it can be used to see who's got a scummy mindset or not. But i'm pretty sure it's just a fake claim so i don't personally care much about it. I don't believe this game actually has a jester.
How..? It's the definition of WIFOM.
The views without justification get my attention here.
This is oddball. VI or something...
And this is actually very silly.
In post 148, Sakura Hana wrote:Also I doubt any scum would've fallen for that, specially if at least one of their teammates is paying attention.
Speculating on scum's reaction to a reaction test is WIFOM.
What does it matter anyway? You're giving scum the opportunity to hide from you by describing how they would or wouldn't act? Or you're explaining away what is scum behaviour vs town behaviour? This comment is fishy.
Why?
Lynching a claimed townie is not LHF. It's easy NK, but not LHF.
There's WIFOM on what happens if he survives to D2 as well. Maybe then they become LHF, but not D1.
In post 170, Sakura Hana wrote:From my PoV, he does look scummy in a town way, that makes people just want to lynch him, but he's not even trying to accomplish any goal, and seems to believe he's found scum in Mohab and isnt convincing anyone either, plus it's weird to claim VT right then and there if he was scum, which makes him look like LHF for me. Because people want to lynch him for it.
You can't look scummy in a town way. You're either town acting suspiciously or not. Secondly, your emphasis on him being LHF is odd. Why are you guarding him?
In post 181, Porkens wrote:My hot take is that Sakura, despite being second highest in activity, has not scumhunted at all.
I agree.
You're very defensive at the slightest attention on you.
Why?
This:
In post 199, Sakura Hana wrote:
There's WIFOM and there's things that make no sense.
So either I'm scum imitating my town game of townhunting over scumhunting, or I'm town.
No matter how much you ask me to hunt for scum in the "normal" way, That's not how I like to play, if you think that's scummy of me then sure go ahead and lynch me, that wont change how I play because I dont have fun playing that way.
... contradicts this:
Can I ask why?
In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
You seem to be doing a very hard job of townreading yourself for others sake. The continued push for people to meta you:
In post 228, Sakura Hana wrote:And as a bonus, everything i've said about my meta and my personality is something you can research yourself, this isnt the first time I've been pushed for "not scumhunting" and i bet it wont be the last.
... feels like 'Look! Look at it all! I'm town gais - I promise'. Then you turn around and do this:
In post 274, Sakura Hana wrote:You also said this based off a reply norwegian did to a post Quick made towards me:
Partner here seems to imply you think im scum and norwegian is my partner.
Am i wrong in that assumption?
... which is scum hunting.
In post 293, Mohab500 wrote:Past few pages have been lots of bickering between NPOM and Sakura, with firebringer and Fredrick finally joining in. firebringer throws (personal) shade at Porkens and wants us to figure out who's the one person he's townreading, while Fredrick just has a lot of inquisitive questions regarding everyone else's reads (but hasn't actually posted any of his?).
Regarding NPOM and Sakura, the chatter was mostly useless, but I did get a strong feeling it was either TvT or SvT, I think a scum-coordinated argument like that would look a lot more doctored/polished if you get me? Not much else to point out regarding those two, will look in more specifics later and try to give a better read.
Fredrick and firebringers action strike some mild scum vibes here. Regarding Fredrick, their curious nature kind of invites me to think they're scum who wants people to feel they're participating without actually doing anything. firebringer's first few posts and shading at Porkens might just be scum wanting to mislynch with an excuse, though I would probably have to look at the meta's of the players to make more accurate reads, I think.
Tell me why a scum argument would be more coordinated or polished if they don't have daytalk (normal doesn't have DT)... This is a fishy statement to make. It's like... fake scum hunting.
In post 315, Sakura Hana wrote:Ok I'll let that go by if you promise to play the game normally with everyone else and just ignore Porkens. It'll be impossible to read you otherwise.
This is a strange interaction.
In post 323, popopopopopopo wrote:vote:porkens
sakura's point about shading without voting or even FOS is good, and firebringer is probably town.
I consider this sheeping and without good cause. Sits you in a healthy place for the wagon too.
In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.
... that's, not what he did? I don't even think Porkens threw shade..? He critically analysed two posts that didn't fit together, and then laughed at it after, and then you come in a chainsaw? The claim Porkens made about them being active lurking is true - they are / were. Sakura having to refer to her meta as some sort of justification for her behavior wasn't actually answering the question but deflecting the issue.
Well, there is. We just haven't seen whether you're doing it for the right or wrong reason yet. It's an ambiguous decision making process which allows you an easy out.
In post 373, Porkens wrote: In post 336, popopopopopopo wrote:
shading people without calling them scummy or voting them does nothing except increase distrust between the town members. the fact that you even said "i never called you scum" after the shading is also very bad.
I don’t buy this. My “very observant” post about Sakura was scum hunting, and it led to useful discussion Through which we could develop our reads. I factually stated that I did not call her scum. That has no bearing on whether I think she or her actions are scummy. I’m not casting about trying to make people look scummy. I am asking direct questions and stating my thoughts in an effort to further the game state.
Your argument seems disingenuous to me.
Agree, it appeared to be a chainsaw.
Yeah, I saw that too. I can't make up my mind on NPOM.
In post 365, NorwegianboyEE wrote:This game does have way too many inactive players right now.
@Drew-Sta
@CooLDoG
@Blurryface3189
@Persivul
In post 395, Sakura Hana wrote:So, Looking at the mod's confirmation post, there's 1 player that hasn't confirmed yet.
Persivul is V/LA according to his profile so that could easily be the cause of him not posting. (Although an ego search turns out he's at least posting on his other games, V/LA supposed to end today so I hope we hear from him)
CD hasn't been on site for 2 days, could be the person that hasnt confirmed.
Looking at Blurry's site activity seems to be someone that posts once every blue moon.
Same with Drew.
Looks like we just got some people that just arent active in general. I don't think we can discern alignment from activity alone.
These two posts in tandem appear to be attempts to get attention off currently posting players and into the dark. Which is moving from difficult to lynch players and on to unable to be defended targets.
The decision to move there when neither of these players have formed strong scum reads they've advertised, plus the fact that they seem unwilling to push a wagon, suggests they're more comfortable with moving something on a player that is not posting, as they will struggle to defend themselves and if lynched, it is easy to absolve responsibility of their actions.
In post 398, NoPowerOverMe wrote:But why post once and then not post for several days? You are just asking to be scumread.
You sheep and then scum read but not really form any argument for it. It's proving difficult to defend your actions.
Nor pokes me at
416, then Sakura takes up the lead in
436 and Nor doesn't prod me again. This seems odd. Especially since both were the ones pushing for non-posters as possible suspects. The fact they didn't acknowledge each others posts on that either, plus what I've just said, appears to be distancing.
450 and
452 Nor reengages but doesn't push me at all. Sakura then drops off at
470.
So they either town read me now or don't care about the non-posters? I'm not following the behaviour at all.
In post 496, Firebringer wrote: In post 495, Sakura Hana wrote:
I'm curious when and why did u get this strong townread of me, I thought you'd have been able to get this way earlier than when you expressed it, but only now u get a legitimate one.
its the fact that i don't think ur trying to manipulate me in anyway. i think and this is just a theory (and u might try it next time ur scum) u would more or less use me as a foundation to get ur placeholder/foot in the game by locking me in for ur read and then maneuver from there. I think ur playing this without that when the easy option of manipulating me exists and I think even if ur going for a more serious game u would still try to manipulate me in some way.
So i wanted to make sure i didn't see u trying to get me to really townlock u.
This gets my attention from both.
Explaining what would 'allow you to be captured' by someone else via meta and then manipulated, is like... some weird buddying or something. I feel like Sakura's 'not going after someone' here if they have decent understanding of their gameplay to me matches with the whole 'look at my meta, I only town hunt' schtick.
To me it's SvT interaction and I'm leaning to Sakura being scum at this point.
They're very intent on knowing where people sit with them, and then get defensive when people push at them.
In post 512, Sakura Hana wrote: In post 510, Quick wrote:
Let's talk about that process? For me, the only thing saving NPOM rn is their claim.
So? A person is either town or scum.
If there's scum motive behind their actions then they are scum regardless of what they claimed.
If what they claimed and how is towny then there's no scum motive behind their actions.
That's WIFOM. Of course intent is important. They're either lying or not. The trick is working out which.
In post 514, Quick wrote:What is the Scum motive for claiming VT? After ~reasons~ which I won't mention?
I think this is a little naive, or defending something that can't be defended e.g. I don't think you can defend a VT claim this early in the game. It's either a tactic or the play of a VI. I think this is one of the few times meta helps - is NPOW a VI? Their previous games can be indicative of this.
In post 517, Sakura Hana wrote: In post 378, Quick wrote:Out of the active posters, I would say both FB and NPOM have the best shot at being Scum.
When you had previously said:
In post 163, Quick wrote:I take back my TR on you. I can see what you are saying, but that's not the impression I get from NPOM's play here. He either genuinely doesn't want a NK on him (which I have been guilty of before, honestly) or he is makes a WEIRD ASS PLAY here as Scum.
For now, I believe his claim.
In post 166, Quick wrote:
That's the thing... You are low key saying, "No need to kill me because I am VT, look elsewhere" and that implies you think you are good at this game and can solve without being a PR.
Which looks like you forgot you had a townread on your slot, specially considering i called the slot LHF/Lynchbait and you fought me on it.
Gee, this appears to be scumhunting. But I thought you didn't do that...
In post 558, Fredrick A Campbell wrote: In post 448, Drew-Sta wrote:...
You guys have collectively spewed 13 odd pages of shit. Suggesting I can get an accurate read in all that mess is optimistic at the least.
...
Considering recent events, one man's shit is another man's treasure.
You can fish through my shit all day long mate.
You seem so, so certain...
In post 578, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
He seems engaged and trying to gamesolve.
Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
To me that's a scumread without saying it's a scumread.
Yeah... no.
In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
FB's argument was very clear, actually. Your distrust of it seems fishy. I'm not one to white knight, FB could be scum. But your argument around it seems odd.
It's like you want to get rid of them.
In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
This appears to be a scummy, lazy tactic. You're throwing shit at someone and misrepresenting another players view to push your own.
I consider this a tell.
In post 608, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also, it's a minor take considering half the game is dead. But all of the wagons seen so far have been god-awful. Can we please get a good and decent one going on FB for the sake of my sanity. Tnx.
Including your own?
In post 609, Firebringer wrote: In post 583, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I'm not sure i want to trust Firebringer anymore. Because their read on Sakura makes no sense. Why are they so obvtown bruh?
VOTE: Firebringer
In post 585, NorwegianboyEE wrote: In post 496, Firebringer wrote:its the fact that i don't think ur trying to manipulate me in anyway. i think and this is just a theory (and u might try it next time ur scum) u would more or less use me as a foundation to get ur placeholder/foot in the game by locking me in for ur read and then maneuver from there. I think ur playing this without that when the easy option of manipulating me exists and I think even if ur going for a more serious game u would still try to manipulate me in some way.
I'm considering the fact that you've TR NPOM, Quick and now Sakura. I'm not seeing how this game makes sense if all scum are in lurkers. Are you just trying to pocket most of the active players? And what's this "they would manipulate me if i was scum" BS? How do you know that would be scum!Sakura's play here?
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're too fluffy and pockety compared to our last game FB. There's a pretty big difference.
In post 591, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In Fungi Mafia FB was actually lightly scum hunting, also picking a couple few TR's. Not handing them out like candy. Also, even though he always jokes. It was intertwined with actual solving. Here he just doesn't seem to care. As evidenced by wagoning either for some personal BS reason that has nothing to do with the game, or encouraging a wagon a dude that hasn't even posted FFS.
viewtopic.php?p=11828723&user_select%5B ... #p11828723
doesn't seem like a lazy scum norwe push
This makes me second guess my view on norwe, but I also think it's a case of nor pushing to get something started on someone.
In post 614, Firebringer wrote:fungi mafia cliff notes of Norwee:
--> Sometimes gave some insight to players usually mild mannered. Usually only gave long cases for why he thought a player was town.
--> Doesn't try to take control of game or lead. Perfectly willing to take a back seat.
--> Passiveness
Ur scumcase on me doesn't match this.
Yeah, im comfortable with u in my townreads.
Disagree. This isn't what they're doing here IMHO.
Number 1 and 2 don't correlate with their existing behaviour in this game. I checked fungi, they were town. So what are you actually trying to say here?!
I'll come back to
622.
In post 635, Sakura Hana wrote: In post 602, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i'd like Sakura/Quick to actually explain why they tr FB, because that shit makes little sense to me right now.
Firebringer is an old friend and knows all my weaknesses and It hasnt felt like he's trying to exploit them, a scum!FB would have
probably
TR me much earlier considering I got into the game from the get go and would've been pretty easy to call me TR due to meta and I would be none the wiser. His explanation on his TR of me matches his play around me and so I figured he's probably town.
In post 587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:You're too fluffy and pockety compared to our last game FB. There's a pretty big difference.
Our last game he was pretty obsessed with me, but, I feel he was MORE fluffy on fungi mafia.
In post 636, Sakura Hana wrote:Basically my feeling also comes from the fact that Firebringer is a pretty strong player, he is perfectly capable of playing normally,
but where's the fun in that
, and getting himself townread in the process. Considering he's just being fluffy he's just having fun, and being in an environment of people that arent very familiar with him
to my knowledge
he'd have a much easier time just playing normally and getting townread as scum, than whatever he's doing right now, it feels kind of anti-scum, if you know what i mean.
There's a non zero chance he's playing this way in order to pocket specific people
including me
, and you're free to point and laugh at me if he flips scum, but at this point I don't think he's doing anything to advance any specific agenda.
That's buddying to get them in your pocket.
In post 637, Sakura Hana wrote:Oh and talking reads, I do agree that now this is more similar to the town norwegian than the scum norwegian i've seen. So norwegian can go into the town bin too.
You and Nor sit at opposite ends of the spectrum on FB, which IMHO is of interest given the links I've drawn to you both.
In post 638, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don’t think FB flipping scum would equate Sakura scum based on FB’s play around the slot.
And that right there is an interesting post. Basically absolving Sakura from being mafia if FB flips scum. Why would you do that? How do you have any certainty that is the case?! It's a post of certainty, and I cannot understand how you can be so certain about them.
651/post], [post]653,
660,
664,
666,
683 I'll come back to later as there's a lot to analyse in there for me.
Porkens vote in
696 is odd.
Now you touch on me again. And not in the 'sexy Norwegian chick' kind of way.
You seem to like to shift focus at times when focus is on you.
In post 801, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:
In post 578, NoPowerOverMe wrote:
He seems engaged and trying to gamesolve.
Quick could be scum...something’s making me hesitate though so it’s not strong
To me that's a scumread without saying it's a scumread.
So, NoPowerOverMe, you want(ed) more votes on Porkens because he is/was scumreading Quick, whom you assert is a town player. Is that an accurate representation of your thoughts?
This is accurate, but I think you're floating up the wrong shit show mate.
Porkens appears to be trying to trap people but not sure if that's scum hunting or trying to get townies lynched by their own rope.
