Objectively, no.In post 991, Ircher wrote:All of the abilities are antitown.
:/In post 990, farside22 wrote:The only one I don't like is Quick but I think he's 3p.In post 986, Bingle wrote:Thanks. I'll ISO dive to see if I can try to differentiate between checked out town and scum, but that post helps. How do you feel about your company on the wagon though?In post 981, farside22 wrote:So in the beginning he put Quick to L-1 and then calls out manatee about his post to Quick.
Now at first I thought it was a good point but when Manatee explains himself I see a hesitation and then its followed by weak reasoning. Since then I've seen CL buddy up to players with votes and his comment about knowing his own play style and saying it is all NAI really reads as a player trying hard not to play. It's the so low under the radar you won't catch him and he won't show his hand.
I don't really see anything that reads as scum hunting other then one post, and one post does not = town in my world.
(It looks like a shit wagon to me.)
Quick is a 3p in your eyes.In post 889, ManateeDude wrote:At this point I'm ready for this day to be over I quite honestly don't care about the details
I think it was a slipIn post 999, Bingle wrote:Sure, but what motivation does scum have to lie.In post 988, Chemist1422 wrote:Because...town don't usually have a motivation to lie?
You've successfully pointed out that that isn't town indicative. But Not town indicative =/= Scum indicative.
Then Manatee literally posted next post with his reasoning of vote.In post 997, Quick wrote:I mean... There is lazy and then there is this...In post 994, ManateeDude wrote:dont wanna find my iso
I would love to hear the reasoning you got here.In post 998, Quick wrote:I think the only case worth anything here is the case on drew.
If you say so...In post 1003, Doctor Drew wrote:But by all means, if you have a pair, vote me.
you often use the word hoing so your phone has it in its dictionary? respect.
this is all false. first of all, in real life most crimes are bullshit and you should citizen's arrest the cops.In post 945, Ircher wrote:That's a bad analogy for several reasons. The first of which that in real life, many guilty people actually do admit to their crime (i.e.: plea bargains). Aside from that, mafia is different. The dynamics and evidence are different. Scum have a legitimate reason to stay in the shadows, and they also possess a good reason to come out of the shadows to avoid their lynch.
pedit: My second point still stands. Mafia is different because guilty people are not incentivized to start talking in real life. They let the lawyer do the talking for them. In mafia, you don't have a lawyer to defend yourself, so if you're scum, you have to do your own defending.
well we were hoping to get a fun scum role. we TR you fwiw, although my personal confidence in town!you diminishes as you continue this shitpush.In post 949, Ircher wrote:Survivalism is part of it. There's also the fact that your posts are unimpressive. You can tell lurking scum from lurking town based on what they post. So far, you've made a very weak push on boring apparently based on intuition and not even given a smidge of a case. That's the only constructive and pro-town thing you've done this game. Some of your posts indicate you aren't really paying attention to the game. Finally, my standards for activity for your slot is higher due to your slot being a hydra. How is it that between the two of you, the only real read y'all have presented is boring is scum and don't even offer any evidence to support it?
pedit: So both you and your hydra partner were bored with the game from Day 1. Why then did y'all sign up?
How would it be a slip, Chemist? I'm pretty sure that boring is in the list of players, and therefore would receive a card.In post 966, Bingle wrote:@Mod: If a player who was lynched was deathproof and the role
was in the game, would the on lynch trigger occur or not?
In post 976, Bingle wrote:
Someone in {Iconeum, Ircher, Chateau Lobby, Titus, Pigman} should summarize their girls case and someone in {ManateeDude, boring, farside22, Doctor Drew, Quick} should summarize the CL case.
.
In post 996, boring wrote:My reason for voting Château is
a) the way in which he placed Quick at L-1 yesterday. He voted very rapidly after I did. This is a bastard game and there's no reason to believe someone wouldn't lol-hammer (which happened). I think town half as reasonable as hes pretending to be would have given a "hey I'm going to L-1, do we have anything left to process?"
Yes, Quick is doing almost everything in his power to be lynched and based on day 1 and what i know of my ability it makes the most sense that quick is 3p.In post 1001, Bingle wrote::/In post 990, farside22 wrote:The only one I don't like is Quick but I think he's 3p.In post 986, Bingle wrote:Thanks. I'll ISO dive to see if I can try to differentiate between checked out town and scum, but that post helps. How do you feel about your company on the wagon though?In post 981, farside22 wrote:So in the beginning he put Quick to L-1 and then calls out manatee about his post to Quick.
Now at first I thought it was a good point but when Manatee explains himself I see a hesitation and then its followed by weak reasoning. Since then I've seen CL buddy up to players with votes and his comment about knowing his own play style and saying it is all NAI really reads as a player trying hard not to play. It's the so low under the radar you won't catch him and he won't show his hand.
I don't really see anything that reads as scum hunting other then one post, and one post does not = town in my world.
(It looks like a shit wagon to me.)
MD is pushing hard for a lynch based on a lack of town presence and CL being willing to lynch someone who they hadn't shown much suspicion of and also making posts like:
Quick is a 3p in your eyes.In post 889, ManateeDude wrote:At this point I'm ready for this day to be over I quite honestly don't care about the details
boring is the guy who chem "caught in a lie", which, while not scum indicative does not lend confidence to his alignment nor his capability.
Drew is sheeping as best I can tell and also has done nothing.
It is objectively a garbage wagon, and if CL is scum he's almost certainly being bussed based solely on how bad the votes are.
In post 1006, Two Girls One Vote wrote:you often use the word hoing so your phone has it in its dictionary? respect.
What would you like to know, Master?In post 1017, farside22 wrote:Also the only player that CL seems to want to push is Quick and says nothing about anyone else soooooo....????
Any other scum reads and if so who and why?In post 1018, Chateau Lobby wrote:What would you like to know, Master?In post 1017, farside22 wrote:Also the only player that CL seems to want to push is Quick and says nothing about anyone else soooooo....????
Hey! No one said you were my client. You sure are right about cops fucking up though.In post 1007, Two Girls One Vote wrote:this is all false. first of all, in real life most crimes are bullshit and you should citizen's arrest the cops.In post 945, Ircher wrote:That's a bad analogy for several reasons. The first of which that in real life, many guilty people actually do admit to their crime (i.e.: plea bargains). Aside from that, mafia is different. The dynamics and evidence are different. Scum have a legitimate reason to stay in the shadows, and they also possess a good reason to come out of the shadows to avoid their lynch.
pedit: My second point still stands. Mafia is different because guilty people are not incentivized to start talking in real life. They let the lawyer do the talking for them. In mafia, you don't have a lawyer to defend yourself, so if you're scum, you have to do your own defending.
second, i do have a lawyer to argue for me. i come in this thread and make a big mess to make things interesting, and then the girl who enjoys it more comes and argues on my behalf. so you are a big fat liar.
- the money
gonna throw my weight behind this after the wack apache helicopter commentIn post 847, Two Girls One Vote wrote:Uh... so you'd be acting like your normal self as jester? Fair enough, this doesn't feel like your normal self.In post 728, Quick wrote:And I'm not. I would be acting like a dislikable crazy person if I was a Jester.In post 714, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Ircher or Titus is Lyncher if Quick isn’t Fool/Jester.
- the money
farside is literally town?In post 858, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Farside is Scum.
please. pleaseIn post 882, Hoctac wrote:Is anyone compiling a list of claims? I want to make sure I haven't missed any.
thanks babeIn post 919, Two Girls One Vote wrote:But u keep doing it Hellbooks, I support u.
~girl who enjoys it
dopeIn post 962, Bingle wrote:We’re all death proof for most of our lives.In post 960, Quick wrote:Also, I didn't know I was deathproof. Is this true?
well that makes for not a bad case dontcha think
i'd vote TSEIn post 980, farside22 wrote:Scum read on TSE/BM but I will see if Hotoc will clear them.
there are a lot of town out there who like to yolovote i would say it has like higher town equity evenIn post 996, boring wrote:I think town half as reasonable as hes pretending to be would have given a "hey I'm going to L-1, do we have anything left to process?"
you're right but also the lie i think weakly indicates scum as in maybe it makes sense for boring as scum to want to pay attention to what the cards are doing and try to mess with it and just royally fucked up in that department, it's not likely but it seems like the most likely explanation i can think of. regardless i think her posts just aren't greatIn post 1001, Bingle wrote:boring is the guy who chem "caught in a lie", which, while not scum indicative does not lend confidence to his alignment nor his capability.
