@BMIn post 288, Battle Mage wrote:I'll finish catch up tomorrow.
Are you finished catching up? I wanted to make sure before I fully reassessed my read on you.
@BMIn post 288, Battle Mage wrote:I'll finish catch up tomorrow.
I agreed with you that I was playing bad and that I would be a good policy lynch. I can see how lynching me could be the best play for town. I wasn't in the mood to keep repeating my noob claim. I also wanted to remove myself from the game to see if that would help bring any clarity.In post 337, Battle Mage wrote:...why?In post 335, SleeperSoul wrote:Hey guys.
I'm just posting to let you know I'm keeping an eye on BM's ISO for when he finishes catching up.
I did skim the most recent posts here. I might reply with something short if you scream at me really loud. Other than that I'm going to be prodging and waiting for BM's catch up. I'll start posting content again when he's finished.
I literally just finished a newbie game where we won as town, on Day 2. We lynched the lurkiest players on Day 1 and Day 2 - both were scum. Every other player was active, and town.In post 378, midwaybear wrote:imagine having a lurker as your biggest scumread.
BM, how strong is your read on sleeper soul.
on the contrary, the main reason they were lynched was because everyone else was posting and actively scumhunting from the start, and acting pro-town, and therefore by PoE, the two players who had been relatively quiet, were the sneaky scum.In post 381, midwaybear wrote:it's different here because gibus and poyzin both had content to evaluate. Gobble doesn't.
How about you let him talk before trying to power a wagon on him.
even the Mod thinks GG is scum.In post 3, Micc wrote: Try to check in at least once a day. Besides the activity requirements listed in Plotinus' original post, it's just necessary for a fun and healthy game that everyoneplays.If you post very rarely, or only post a little bit at a time, you may get scumread for lurking.Even if you are not scumread for it, what's the fun in playing a game where multiple people are hardly participating?
In post 285, SleeperSoul wrote:How do you know the way I would play as scum?In post 284, Battle Mage wrote:you've played in a way I think you would play as scum.
^This just seems like such a stretch.... Someone who hasn't been lynched as mafia in 10 years is posting this? Really weird IMO.In post 383, Battle Mage wrote:In post 3, Micc wrote:
Try to check in at least once a day. Besides the activity requirements listed in Plotinus' original post, it's just necessary for a fun and healthy game that everyone plays. If you post very rarely, or only post a little bit at a time, you may get scumread for lurking. Even if you are not scumread for it, what's the fun in playing a game where multiple people are hardly participating?
even the Mod thinks GG is scum.
you realize that's his only argument right?In post 386, Freddiethelady wrote:bm makes a compelling argument about getting rid of GG, but i don't agree that we should policy lynch someone based on zero participation only.
are you asking me to defend BM and his arguments?In post 387, midwaybear wrote:you realize that's his only argument right?In post 386, Freddiethelady wrote:bm makes a compelling argument about getting rid of GG, but i don't agree that we should policy lynch someone based on zero participation only.
humm. by this, are you suggesting that you think that the scum pair is BM and midway?In post 388, SleeperSoul wrote:I'm okay with lynching midway if BM is a no go.
where did I say that? NoIn post 389, Freddiethelady wrote:are you asking me to defend BM and his arguments?
In post 394, GeneralWu wrote:I do agree that gobbledygook has been posting a lot of activity posts.
I also checked his profile and it says that he has been posting on other forums during the time he claimed he was sick.
I kinda think this is a bit suspicious.
I would feel better about that if he told us that was the reason why. If he's posting in other games, it's super easy to say "the other games I'm in are taking up all my attention and effort right now" or whatever.In post 396, midwaybear wrote:uh you realize it could be lack of interest which is not necessarily AI?