In post 1620, Green Crayons wrote:I don’t really understand your Q. Or, I should say, the motivation behind it in terms of what you’re trying to clarify.
Cases usually don’t involve silver bullets. There isn’t one single thing that I think is the deal sealer. It’s the totality of Reck’s observation of CLAP’s D1 play. And I think CLAP is on a potential bus slot for the farside wagon.
I'm trying to get you to articulate what you think the case on Puppy actually is because I don't find it that strong, so when I see someone just sheeping on to it, I want them to actually explain their position. I never said a word about a "silver bullet" or a "deal sealer." I asked you to explain, with words, what you thought the best reasons were. I'm not really sure what is so confusing there or difficult to answer.
In post 1622, Hoopla wrote:farside opted for a similar style of revelation-softclaiming as reck earlier in the game.
though scum should be thinking about their strategy re: revelations, my intuition suggests that two scum wouldn't both soft a revelation D1.
could reck/farside both be so crafty?
I don't really find these things that similar. Farside's was under pressure, iirc. Seems like it could be something she faked, especially since she never made an actual revelation claim. Reck's seems more ahead of the curve.
In post 1630, Green Crayons wrote:If we have everyone with a revelation claim they have a revelation, does that help us narrow town pool?
I don’t think so but just throwing it out there in case if I’m missing something.
I think this only makes sense if we believe farside was the scum with info. I'm not sure I really do. Ostensibly, that info would help a scum fake claim, so if it was hers I don't see why she wouldn't have revealed it to try and stop her purge yesterday. Now, if it was her buddy's and she didn't want to outright steal it for herself, I could see the soft claim.
good memory! I totally forgot about this aspect of Vi games.