Is there anything with me that you want to talk about? I'm all ears. I do remember somewhat liking your earlier posts, but your most recent posts have been neutral to me. Sorry that you feel left out though. I think it's more of a matter of people being online at the same time compared to trying to exclude someone from the conversation.In post 632, Lady 5 wrote:I liked G4 and was hoping he would talk to me
This might be personal bias, but I don't think Lady 6(Seal) should accept Gentleman 7's offer at this point.
This is a fair point, but I'm more in the camp that town should always try to pair with who they think is town compared to who they think is scum. It makes sense that the scummier people will end up having less priority in choosing their partners, but I just don't like the idea of intentionally pairing up with a scumread to end up suiciding your slot. Seems too risky.In post 637, Lady 2 wrote:I feel like the incentive should be to partner with someone who is read similarly to you. As in, if you're town but scummy enough to not make it to endgame, you would want to pair up with scum in order to redirect people's scumreads on you somewhere useful.
Aren't these the same?In post 644, Lady 2 wrote:So maybe it's less that your partner has to be read similarly to you, and more that your partner has to have an alignment that matches how you are read.
This is also a good point.In post 646, Lady 7 wrote:I guess I just have less faith in someone's ability to play relative to the group when they have their own fears in regards to someone.
This isn't answering Lady 6's question of why she should dance with you.In post 657, Gentleman 7 wrote:Just my general impressions. I'm excited to get to voting.
@Lady 4. I looked through your ISO and this is what I found about why you scumread Lady 2. I think this has been asked before, but which quotes from Lady 2 seem to be pushing a scum agenda to you? I can agree with the fluff/semi-game advancing posts, but I'm willing to look past that on my read of her for now(as many have done such a thing to some extent).In post 421, Lady 4 wrote:This post really bothered me for some reason so I went and ISOed 2 and I think I figured out why. 2 has a lot of fluffy posts and semi sort of game advancing looking posts but they all feel really surface level and scum motivated.
It would be generous to say that your posts have quality. Why do you scumread me?In post 695, Gentleman 2 wrote:Quantity is not synonym to alignment. Quality is what matters.