A warlock, a werewolf, and a vampire... [Game Over]

[Lady 7]

Hi all. Do I have a dance partner yet? Might be nice to know while I read up.

G9.YugiohGuy is your partner

[Gentleman 3]

Ok I know G3 said he was waiting until later to develop scumreads more in-depth but his continued insistence on finding people to die based on having the least to townread them on really really bothers me. It's so fence sitty and IMO pointless.

Could you clarify on how you think it's "fence sitty"? It's not as though I'm refusing to take a stance; quite the opposite, really. I

am

taking a decisive stance. It's just that my stance is based on "negative" reasons rather than "positive" reasons, so to speak.

[Lady 3]

I hope he doesn't have two left feet

[Gentleman 3]

Do you not have access to a private thread with him?

[Lady 1]

I'm lonely

[Lady 7]

Do you not have access to a private thread with him?

My least favorite part of the setup is you only get the PT for the singular night phase.

[Lady 6]

Scum wants to pair up as soon as possible. Gent 5 or Gent 9 comes into mind.

Yeah but why are the ladies excluded from this
Lady 3 was given a pass form everyone for accepting so early and I think it was scummy

Funnily enough, I just realized that I don't like any of the pairs we have so far.

Who does?

There are less ladies than men, meaning ladies don't have to be quite as survivalistic in the pre-dance

[Gentleman 4]

Do you not have access to a private thread with him?

They are given after the pre dance phase ends and not right after the pairings are confirmed.

G9/L3 I think is a good candidate to go first in the dance
I feel they are overlooked because they paired so early but that was really garbage

Is the early pairing the basis of your unease on the slots? I feel like gentleman 9 has been pretty townie thus far.

[Lady 7]

Wait you get the PT for the entire game now?

[Gentleman 4]

Wait you get the PT for the entire game now?

Well it’s not just for the single night phase, but you still have to wait until pre dance ends.

[Lady 6]

I pretty much agree with G3's reasoning on G6, in that my mild reasons for town reading G2 and G7 are stronger than my even milder reasons for seeing G6 as town.

[Lady 1]

I pretty much agree with G3's reasoning on G6, in that my mild reasons for town reading G2 and G7 are stronger than my even milder reasons for seeing G6 as town.

I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river

[Gentleman 6]

I pretty much agree with G3's reasoning on G6, in that my mild reasons for town reading G2 and G7 are stronger than my even milder reasons for seeing G6 as town.

I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river

Is this your incredibly obstinate way of proposing to me?

[Lady 2]

I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river

You want to send G4 down the river?

[Lady 6]

G6, what are your main reads/takes at the moment?

[Lady 1]

I pretty much agree with G3's reasoning on G6, in that my mild reasons for town reading G2 and G7 are stronger than my even milder reasons for seeing G6 as town.

I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river

Is this your incredibly obstinate way of proposing to me?

Is it working?

I personally hope L2 doesn't say yes to G4 and we send him down the river

You want to send G4 down the river?

Kinda. Him or G7 given I doubt anyone will take G7 seriously ever

[Lady 4]

Ok I know G3 said he was waiting until later to develop scumreads more in-depth but his continued insistence on finding people to die based on having the least to townread them on really really bothers me. It's so fence sitty and IMO pointless.

Could you clarify on how you think it's "fence sitty"? It's not as though I'm refusing to take a stance; quite the opposite, really. I

am

taking a decisive stance. It's just that my stance is based on "negative" reasons rather than "positive" reasons, so to speak.

It seems like an excuse to fall back on if your "scumreads" flip town
Like "oh they just didn't show their towniness they should have done better"
Fence sitty maybe not the right term but I don't know what would be better

Do you not have access to a private thread with him?

They are given after the pre dance phase ends and not right after the pairings are confirmed.

G9/L3 I think is a good candidate to go first in the dance
I feel they are overlooked because they paired so early but that was really garbage

Is the early pairing the basis of your unease on the slots? I feel like gentleman 9 has been pretty townie thus far.

Yes
L3 really bothered me mainly

[Gentleman 6]

G6, what are your main reads/takes at the moment?

I'm townhunting, and leaving the catchup-read to future-me's problem tomorrow (IRL tomrorow that is)

Guy 3 is town. (I suspect I both know who he is, and don't know who is is at the same time and it vexes me)
Guy 2 is town. (Is nobody going to address that he's playing so carefree he didn't even notice I'm not the player who was having issues, even though I explicitly made it a part of my opening moves)
Lady 5 is town. (Do I really need to explain this one?)

I believe Lady 1 is best sorted by me in our lewd handholding dungeon, and am willing to commit to yeeting myself and her if I don't like the kinks.


I'm sure I'd have more reads if I went back and read the initial pages, and I will do so eventually, but those are the towns that strike my fancy right now.

[Lady 6]

I agree that Guy 2 might be town, however his style does give me some pause because his behavior could be a player thing instead of an alignment thing if that makes sense.

Like he's *so* off the wall it might just be down to the player.

[Lady 4]

This is where I wish I had meta

[Gentleman 6]

This is where I wish I had meta

Me too, lass. Me too.

[Lady 7]

Cowards.

[Gentleman 3]

Ok I know G3 said he was waiting until later to develop scumreads more in-depth but his continued insistence on finding people to die based on having the least to townread them on really really bothers me. It's so fence sitty and IMO pointless.

Could you clarify on how you think it's "fence sitty"? It's not as though I'm refusing to take a stance; quite the opposite, really. I

am

taking a decisive stance. It's just that my stance is based on "negative" reasons rather than "positive" reasons, so to speak.

It seems like an excuse to fall back on if your "scumreads" flip town
Like "oh they just didn't show their towniness they should have done better"
Fence sitty maybe not the right term but I don't know what would be better

I try to avoid blaming other people when I'm wrong on someone, especially the person that I was wrong on. It's not conducive to self-improvement.

Regardless, I'm still not sure I really understand. I don't get what the material difference between that sort of excuse and someone saying "I guess I was wrong" or "Wow they played so scummily" if one of their more positive scumreads were to flip town.

Why is it that you think that my "style" (for lack of a better term) of reads is more likely to come from scum? I feel I should also say that it's not as though I've chosen to form reads this way; if I had picked up on more positive reasons to scumread an unpaired Gentleman, then I would. I haven't, and so here I am.

[Lady 6]

I'd also add it's rather hard, at least for me, to get strong scum reads at this point in the game. Most players can and choose to play in a fairly lowkey fashion (no one even has to vote yet), and that makes it hard to get positive reasons to scum read someone. The best thing to do imo is to just look at who isn't doing town things.

that's probably why usually one of the low posters ends up going out in pre-dance

[Gentleman 2]

Scum wants to pair up as soon as possible. Gent 5 or Gent 9 comes into mind.

Yeah but why are the ladies excluded from this

They don't have to worry about being unpaired