A warlock, a werewolf, and a vampire... [Game Over]

[Gentleman 1]

also, he claims he's still scum reading L1, but after his scum read he

Yeah actually that doesn’t read as any sort of recognizable agenda with that correction, still not a fan of the damage control but it’s probably not enough to substantiate a vote rn

backs off of it and gives himself an excuse not to vote. He's literally just floating around and he seems content to. "probably not enough to substantiate a vote rn" is a really weird thing for town to say especially at this stage in the game.

this is grossly misinterpreting the specifics of my read
I went back to scumreading L1 after ISOing L2 and seeing some of the posts L2 quoted by L1, and feeling scum vibes from how awful L1's takes were. The fact I continued feeling that way about L1's early content meant the initial backing off was probably a mistake

I understand I haven't been the clearest on these things but this is still dead wrong

[Lady 6]

how awful L1's takes were.

could you expand on this?

[Gentleman 1]

WHO ASKS THAT THOUGH

WHO THE FUCK ASKS THAT

sssshhhhhh, we aren't allowed to talk about who's who in this game yet, gentleman 1. save that for post-game

the answer was scum. Scum makes that post. Sure town make that if they're either blithely clueless or massively pedantic, but it's a very scum post to make imo
like it's a scumslip in a way that is very easy to wave off, which deflates real arguments for the person being scum
not to go on an irl tract but it's also why false flag operators are a horrible thing to not handle, because if you let the false issues go unanswered for, real issues tend to drown in the noise

[Gentleman 9]

WHAT

[Gentleman 6]

WHO ASKS THAT THOUGH

WHO THE FUCK ASKS THAT

sssshhhhhh, we aren't allowed to talk about who's who in this game yet, gentleman 1. save that for post-game

the answer was scum. Scum makes that post. Sure town make that if they're either blithely clueless or massively pedantic, but it's a very scum post to make imo
like it's a scumslip in a way that is very easy to wave off, which deflates real arguments for the person being scum
not to go on an irl tract but it's also why false flag operators are a horrible thing to not handle, because if you let the false issues go unanswered for, real issues tend to drown in the noise

I feel like you must be a hoot at parties.

[Gentleman 6]

But hey, I'll entertain it... in what way is this ever a scumslip?

Lay the hypothetical on me, walk me through scum guy the 9th logic or accidental logic when making that post.

[Lady 6]

I think im going insane

[Gentleman 6]

I think im going insane

You and me both, lass.

You and me both.

Let's ignore them and talk about your boyfriend/boytoy. I harbor extreme hope he's not posting here because he's uber tryhard gamesolving in the PT with you. A simple "yes he is posting there" would be incredibly helpful if you could give me false hope, that would be nice.

[Gentleman 8]

he's trying to outdo my seal theory

not sure i like having competition

[Lady 6]

yes he is posting there

(he is not posting there)

[Gentleman 8]

i forgot to mention, giving gentleman 3 (expired on 2020-08-06 23:19:00) (3 days since his last post) before i just say don't bother waiting, let's get a flip going

[Gentleman 6]

yes he is posting there

(he is not posting there)

I love-hate you.

I was really hopeful that he wasn't petering off with all this new data to ingest....

[Gentleman 1]

how awful L1's takes were.

could you expand on this?

I feel like L1 was wildly accusing people and playing a hard AtE facade to cover her ass
I went back into her ISO to make sure this was the initial logic and there's a good post by G4 summing up my wind accusation point

why is Lady 1 just calling random people wolfs...

and her reaction to this is

why is Lady 1 just calling random people wolfs...

Why is Gentleman 4 commenting on something like this instead of finding the wolves! See what I did there?

no actual rebuttal, just playing the victim.

also with my recent callout towards G9 I'd like to mention there's some interesting associatives in L1's ISO for those two as well

and like the more I read her ISO the more I see in specific that I don't like, so if when I hit the point where I'm ready to give a full case, people want a case, I'll give it

[Gentleman 9]

<- Mfw using evidence from page 4

[Gentleman 2]

What was the scumslip?

[Gentleman 1]

But hey, I'll entertain it... in what way is this ever a scumslip?

Lay the hypothetical on me, walk me through scum guy the 9th logic or accidental logic when making that post.

Going forward if someone tries to scumcase him there's that not-scumslip that people can point to and deconstruct arguments with
it's short term weird for long term gain

[Gentleman 6]

I think I've woken up in Bizzaro-world.

That's not a case of you showing how this is a scum slip, this is you arguing that it has scum utility.

SCUMSLIP is a very specific definition.

[Gentleman 1]

What was the scumslip?

why the hell would town ask about that?
there's obviously the counterpoint of "why would scum ask?", and that's where the actual read on that post starts to form, because there's not really a rebuttal to that, as I said clueless or pedantic town could also ask, so now it becomes a bit of a "townpoint" for G9 because there's better logic for town to post it versus scum

it's a massive WIFOM bomb but it's logical (in as much as this counts as logic) to me

PEdit: okay yeah G6 is right, it's not a scumslip in reality, but a scum utility post. I just started calling it that because it was the first word that hit my brain

[Lady 3]

just to clarify are we analyzing the scum incentive for asking how to format posts in the scum pt

[Gentleman 1]

<- Mfw using evidence from page 4

you're really bitching at me for using evidence from before I replaced in? Everything is content, a lot of people have trouble telling that but that's the truth

nice to see you sticking your neck out for your scumbuddy btw

[Gentleman 1]

just to clarify are we analyzing the scum incentive for asking how to format posts in the scum pt

yes

[Gentleman 5]

i forgot to mention, giving gentleman 3 (expired on 2020-08-06 23:19:00) (3 days since his last post) before i just say don't bother waiting, let's get a flip going

Do you mean 2 days since last post or do you want to wait a full day extra on top of the countdown

[Lady 1]

What did I miss I was busy doing things I cared about more

[Gentleman 5]

What did I miss I was busy doing things I cared about more

Read gent 2 posts

[Gentleman 2]

I'm getting paranoid Gent 1 is intentionally jesting to look town and seal his pair to be the endgaming one.