In post 49, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:"Scum syntax" arguments are heresy.
VOTE: Bell
From my long experience of playing with Norweegian (1 game!), he screams town when he's town. My ears are open for the scream.
In post 80, NoPowerOverMe wrote:No one ever likes my openings.
Thank youIn post 54, SJReaver wrote:I'm here for you, bro.In post 51, Marshmallow Marshall wrote: And now, can we start calling eachother scum so that we can have meaningful discussion, please? This debate about lynching and shooting basing on activity isn't alignment indicative, and we've basically killed RVS' significance here.
VOTE: Mashmallow
Reason:Claims previous discussion is NAI and has killed RVS onpage 2when the majority of people haven't voted. Claims calling others scum is more useful but then doesn't do it themselves.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
I thought this was sarcasm.In post 52, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Light townread on Pickaxe Pete because he actually tries to generate AI discussion and ignores the NAI stuffIn post 42, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I see people.
Because it was the best thing to do at the time xD. You advocated for the scum syntax theory.In post 100, Bell wrote:In post 49, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:"Scum syntax" arguments are heresy.
VOTE: Bell
From my long experience of playing with Norweegian (1 game!), he screams town when he's town. My ears are open for the scream.
You seem a little townie, why are you voting me?
You're probably not going to like it, but it was realIn post 105, Bell wrote:I thought this was sarcasm.In post 52, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Light townread on Pickaxe Pete because he actually tries to generate AI discussion and ignores the NAI stuffIn post 42, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I see people.
. It doesn't mean I'm locking him as town, but it means I like him. Objections? 
The continued inability of others to read my mind.In post 104, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:
Why do you feel the need to put "reason" next to every vote you make?
He was making a joke. Not a good one, but it's Bell. You have to make allowances.In post 106, Marshmallow Marshall wrote: Because it was the best thing to do at the time xD. You advocated for the scum syntax theory.
It's not that I don't want to read it, I love game theory. I just don't love when it takes over the thread and that people begin to read eachother based on theory agreements or disagreements, because in my experience, that always leads to town getting lynched or scum getting a lot of easy town points.In post 64, superbowl9 wrote:This is the correct takeIn post 51, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:This all depends on the circumstances... if a high activity slot is scummy, you should create a massive discussion around it and potentially lynch it. You will get a relatively likely scum flip + a ton of info to work with. If noone really strikes anyone as super scummy, then lynching among the lurkers is a good idea.This isn't. Never understood why people can't just scroll past things theory if they don't want to read it?In post 51, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:And now, can we start calling eachother scum so that we can have meaningful discussion, please? This debate about lynching and shooting basing on activity isn't alignment indicative, and we've basically killed RVS' significance here.
Voting with a line meant to be replied to, and not taking part to the discussion about theory that took over the thread for some posts. Not saying his posts are legendary, but they are still better than Superbowl's, for example.In post 65, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:What about his posts looked like trying to generate AI discussion to you?In post 52, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Light townread on Pickaxe Pete because he actually tries to generate AI discussion and ignores the NAI stuffIn post 42, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I see people.
VOTE: Marshmallow
Fair.In post 109, SJReaver wrote:The continued inability of others to read my mind.In post 104, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:
Why do you feel the need to put "reason" next to every vote you make?
He was making a joke. Not a good one, but it's Bell. You have to make allowances.In post 106, Marshmallow Marshall wrote: Because it was the best thing to do at the time xD. You advocated for the scum syntax theory.
Sorry for what? I feel dumb for being clueless in front of this two-word post lolIn post 70, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:lol sorryIn post 69, ofrhz wrote:Was this a serious vote?In post 49, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:"Scum syntax" arguments are heresy.
VOTE: Bell
From my long experience of playing with Norweegian (1 game!), he screams town when he's town. My ears are open for the scream.
We shall see. I never said this read was anything strong. I just like the intent I see behind his simple posts. I could be wrong, of course. But I could also be right. Also note that "findingIn post 112, Bell wrote:You’re looking into the void and letting your brain come up with explanations with no evidence behind them.
He voted somebody who hasn't Replied to their role pm yet.
Activity tell eh.In post 31, SJReaver wrote:I did notice a serious lack of engagement from you at points. You strike me as someone who likes a mental challenge and when you're allowed to coast as scum, you mentally check out. When the pinch is on, you suddenly become more active.In post 26, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I got a light TR on SJReaver for his post pointing out he read my scumgame and noted he believes i'm skilled at playing as scum. It doesn't seem like something scum!him would just casually put out there if it wasn't a real worry for him.
That you've made an appearance and are reading people this early suggests the basic set up of the game (find the bad guys) is helping to motivate you.
As days pass, I hope you remain that way.
In post 49, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:From my long experience of playing with Norweegian (1 game!), he screams town when he's town.
We need early vig shoots because right now we’re fighting the wagon dynamics almost more than scum itself. I played in a large 50 game before and we needed 26 votes to get a lynch in D1. Do you have any idea how much of a pain in the ass it is to convince 26 people to lynch a player?In post 44, Bell wrote:In general, unless you’re really, really, really sure you know that player is scum you don’t shoot n1.
I don't follow. Which line by Pickaxe Pete warranted a response...? Like aside from you who quoted his posts to give him a townlean, no one even bothered to respond to Pete's posts.In post 110, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:In post 65, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:What about his posts looked like trying to generate AI discussion to you?In post 52, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Light townread on Pickaxe Pete because he actually tries to generate AI discussion and ignores the NAI stuffIn post 42, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I see people.
VOTE: MarshmallowVoting with a line meant to be replied to, and not taking part to the discussion about theory that took over the thread for some posts. Not saying his posts are legendary, but they are still better than Superbowl's, for example.
This reads like busywork to me. Fake attempt at looking like town doing things useful for town. Bell is my first scumread so far.In post 50, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Are we really reading into the reasons for which people read other games when they were bored? That looks like a prototype of NAI thing to me.
In my first game, I argued that someone was mafia because they used emotes. Even if this is a weak observation, it's a step up.In post 117, NorwegianboyEE wrote: Activity tell eh.
Well i won’t disagree with you. I tend to lose interest sometimes if the game loses energy and i’m scum. (Because then i see no point in re-energizing it)
I altslippedIn post 113, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Sorry for what? I feel dumb for being clueless in front of this two-word post lol