In post 1977, Titus wrote:Has the number of scum been confirmed?
ManateeDude wrote:The townvmafia numbers are confirmed to be 16v5
In post 1977, Titus wrote:Has the number of scum been confirmed?
ManateeDude wrote:The townvmafia numbers are confirmed to be 16v5
Oh 72 said it in the post after, derpIn post 1978, 72offsuit wrote:Post 1 at the bottom, setup notes:
e townvmafia numbers are confirmed to be 16v5
As I said yesterday, I do think 72 is more likely scum than any of the other top wagons but I wouldn't hate an A50 hammer either.In post 1982, superbowl9 wrote:VOTE: 72offsuit I don't like A50 wagon also am probly not gonna post for the rest of the day
I don't understand if you're calling out the fact they're SRing two on their wagon or TRing one on their wagon.In post 1983, Almost50 wrote:No no no. You can't state a TR on someone voting you. You are the beacon of townyness and everyone who as much as looks at you in an unfavourable way must be scum.In post 1661, NorwegianboyEE wrote:A50 scumIn post 1639, Nero Cain wrote:NorwegianboyEE (4):Almost50, JacksonVirgo , stan1ey, Glitch
Glitch scum
Stan1ey might or might not be scum
JacksonVirgo might be town
DieIn post 1992, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:I am sorry. I have to.In post 1989, ManateeDude wrote:Deadline:FROZEN
Spoiler:
Just vote 72 normally
In post 2118, Titus wrote:VOTE: Siteflaking
I feel like making a completely arbitrary move with the deadline frozen.
It's a game is static and now that we aren't deadline scrambling I want to stir shit up and diagnose shit.In post 2119, Bell wrote:^ Is this a gut read?
1. That's because Siteflaking isn't a scumread. It's a stir shit up vote. If I say no, the logical question is for a case. I don't have one. Yet, siteflaking isn't a gut read either.
I cannot parse this. I will try again in the AM.In post 2137, Bell wrote:Okay. I was saying hello because I saw a non-entity vote another sort of entity and entities should stick together, don’t you think?
Are these people you want and think that can lynch today?In post 2123, Nero Cain wrote:Hiraki
Pickaxe Pete
Alisae
I Keep Siteflaking
Fwesnid
JacksonVirgo
Bell
Nero Cain
stan1ey
Almost50
superbowl9
NoPowerOverMe
SJReaver
Marshmallow Marshall
ralph217
72offsuit
Titus
NorwegianboyEE
Town looter
Glitch
Lapsa
So im literally @ town looter, empty Ali and Lapsa slots, ralph, MM abd I guess IKS b/c they are prety null to me
I'll check what Offsuit said about A50, but it could just be that he's sheeping a part of the town to get off the hook lol.In post 1934, NorwegianboyEE wrote:It’s a possibility that should be looked at if he flips scum. But i’d prefer us all to just vote someone like Almost50 because it’s more informative over all. And 72 is looking better to me for bringing up scummy things he thinks A50 has done.In post 1910, Nero Cain wrote:Glitch has been talking up a pl on Lapsa since his first post and had him as a light scum read in one of his posts. When fre was getting wagoned ralph vanity voted lapsa. I think its a somewhat common scum tactic for scum to sit there and vanity vote thier buddy while town lynched town. Could lapsa be getting bussed here?In post 1890, NorwegianboyEE wrote:If Lapsa scum= still no idea who teammates are because they haven’t said anything of relevance.
VOTE: Almost50
Uncle Norwee needs you to do your part for the town. Are you patriotic enough?
Agreed with that suggestion, btw. His post about Superbowl is just sheeping what had already been said by a few people, including myself. It's not bad, but it's nothing original either.In post 2142, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:Are these people you want and think that can lynch today?In post 2123, Nero Cain wrote:Hiraki
Pickaxe Pete
Alisae
I Keep Siteflaking
Fwesnid
JacksonVirgo
Bell
Nero Cain
stan1ey
Almost50
superbowl9
NoPowerOverMe
SJReaver
Marshmallow Marshall
ralph217
72offsuit
Titus
NorwegianboyEE
Town looter
Glitch
Lapsa
So im literally @ town looter, empty Ali and Lapsa slots, ralph, MM abd I guess IKS b/c they are prety null to me
If yes, why exclude Titus? I find this slot as one of the most null slot in the game.
Why not VOTE: 72?
Spoiler:
is the only "good" post he has made.
Oh well that changes things. I believe him (or at least think that he is dead tomorrow if it's a lie anyway). VOTE: 72offsuitIn post 1690, Fwesnid wrote:Claiming now to save time.In post 1668, Titus wrote:VOTE: Fwes
It's Saturday so I won't be around much because it's my DnD day. Just consider me voting the largest wagon.
I am a3-shot loud gunsmith.
Vote for me if you think I'm scum who's gonna repeatedly claimed blocked or a mafia loud rolecop/gunsmith/follower.
Didn't crumb since loud is provable, and if I got no gun I'd crumb 'inno' such that their person I visited would hopefully see it, when I got a gun result I'd ask the person to roleclaim at start of day after saying I have a guilty.
You better not all cfd norwee because iT'S tHe lArGeSt wAgOn.
That can be part of the reason but that should not be the entire reason.
My top scumreads right now are offsuit and titus.
In post 2000, Almost50 wrote:THANK YOU.In post 1998, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Spoiler: blah
Dude you can have delusions about my supposed worry about PR's as much as you want, it won't come true.
This responseconfirmsNorweeknowsI am TOWN. Otherwise, I wouldn't be "delusional". I would be "faking".
Honestly, I don't see why scum!A50 uses so weak arguments against Norwee here. Would he seriously expect that post to convinceIn post 2008, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I really was expecting more than: "Aha!! Gotcha! You used a word!" to explain why you're so aggressive and confident, but i guess that was too much to ask for.
Okay... on a scale of the opposite of towny to scummy, how bad is this post? "You don't have to try to read him yourself, just sheep me" as a reply to a serious post that closes a conversation is horrible lol. Could Norwee actually be scum... hmmmmm. It definetly has to be considered. And I'm not voting A50.In post 2037, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The deal is that he's falling apart from the seams due to the cognitive pressure of rolling scum. You don't have to waste time trying to understand him, he's just scum.In post 2034, SJReaver wrote:No, it doesn't. Even as a 'scum syntax' argument, this is weak.In post 2000, Almost50 wrote:THANK YOU.In post 1998, NorwegianboyEE wrote: Dude you can have delusions about my supposed worry about PR's as much as you want, it won't come true.
This responseconfirmsNorweeknowsI am TOWN. Otherwise, I wouldn't be "delusional". I would be "faking".
I know you're smarter than this so I'm wondering what the deal is.