In post 2361, Titus wrote:72offsuit, what caused you to ISO siteflaking?
Its obvious.
Titus is probs scum just based off this post.
Then you can tell me if it's obvious. Right now, I am the only person you're voting with. To turn around and attack the only person voting with you makes little sense.
Clarifying why you ISOed serves three purposes. First, it helps me read your flail. Second, it draws more attention to siteflaking helping me prove or disprove my theory. Third, if you and siteflaking happen to be scum together (theory wrong but I guessed right), that will come out too.
In post 2361, Titus wrote:72offsuit, what caused you to ISO siteflaking?
Its obvious.
Titus is probs scum just based off this post.
Then you can tell me if it's obvious. Right now, I am the only person you're voting with. To turn around and attack the only person voting with you makes little sense.
Clarifying why you ISOed serves three purposes. First, it helps me read your flail. Second, it draws more attention to siteflaking helping me prove or disprove my theory. Third, if you and siteflaking happen to be scum together (theory wrong but I guessed right), that will come out too.
In post 2361, Titus wrote:72offsuit, what caused you to ISO siteflaking?
Its obvious.
Titus is probs scum just based off this post.
Then you can tell me if it's obvious. Right now, I am the only person you're voting with. To turn around and attack the only person voting with you makes little sense.
Clarifying why you ISOed serves three purposes. First, it helps me read your flail. Second, it draws more attention to siteflaking helping me prove or disprove my theory. Third, if you and siteflaking happen to be scum together (theory wrong but I guessed right), that will come out too.
1. There is no flail.
2. Accusations of flail are scummy
3. You have no theory. You had a vanity vote. You didnt even present a case why IKFS might be scum
4. Why wouldnt !scumMe and! ScumIKFS just ride it through to the end as scum?
In post 2361, Titus wrote:72offsuit, what caused you to ISO siteflaking?
Its obvious.
Titus is probs scum just based off this post.
Then you can tell me if it's obvious. Right now, I am the only person you're voting with. To turn around and attack the only person voting with you makes little sense.
Clarifying why you ISOed serves three purposes. First, it helps me read your flail. Second, it draws more attention to siteflaking helping me prove or disprove my theory. Third, if you and siteflaking happen to be scum together (theory wrong but I guessed right), that will come out too.
If i think your play is scummy of course im goimg to point iy out, even if we r on the same wagon
Why don't you just answer why you ISOed siteflaking if it's obvious.
Second, yes you are flailing. You've FoSed several people in the span of a few pages with contradictory positions with what is actually happening. Both town and scum do this.
Third, you flat out deny my theory exists, which was my best guess at why you ISOed Siteflaking in the first place. I find it hard to believe you outright missed my theory since it's the bulk of my content right before the pause. Namely, my theory is that town are going to town on each other and scum are waiting it out. You argue my vote is vanity and that I am scum, which detracts from the power of your vote...since it's in the same place.
I can infer that you claim to townread A50. Your act of looking for a scumread away from the major wagons suggests that you feel my theory has merit. So overall, your actions are contradictory and confusing.
Lastly, I don't know and I am not sure if you're scum together or not. Answering why scum behave the way they do is far too early. You could be panicked scum bussing to create distance. You could be town panicked. I don't know but your behavior is weird.
In post 2382, Titus wrote:Why don't you just answer why you ISOed siteflaking if it's obvious.
Second, yes you are flailing. You've FoSed several people in the span of a few pages with contradictory positions with what is actually happening. Both town and scum do this.
Third, you flat out deny my theory exists, which was my best guess at why you ISOed Siteflaking in the first place. I find it hard to believe you outright missed my theory since it's the bulk of my content right before the pause. Namely, my theory is that town are going to town on each other and scum are waiting it out. You argue my vote is vanity and that I am scum, which detracts from the power of your vote...since it's in the same place.
I can infer that you claim to townread A50. Your act of looking for a scumread away from the major wagons suggests that you feel my theory has merit. So overall, your actions are contradictory and confusing.
Lastly, I don't know and I am not sure if you're scum together or not. Answering why scum behave the way they do is far too early. You could be panicked scum bussing to create distance. You could be town panicked. I don't know but your behavior is weird.
In post 2382, Titus wrote:Why don't you just answer why you ISOed siteflaking if it's obvious.
Second, yes you are flailing. You've FoSed several people in the span of a few pages with contradictory positions with what is actually happening. Both town and scum do this.
Third, you flat out deny my theory exists, which was my best guess at why you ISOed Siteflaking in the first place. I find it hard to believe you outright missed my theory since it's the bulk of my content right before the pause. Namely, my theory is that town are going to town on each other and scum are waiting it out. You argue my vote is vanity and that I am scum, which detracts from the power of your vote...since it's in the same place.
I can infer that you claim to townread A50. Your act of looking for a scumread away from the major wagons suggests that you feel my theory has merit. So overall, your actions are contradictory and confusing.
Lastly, I don't know and I am not sure if you're scum together or not. Answering why scum behave the way they do is far too early. You could be panicked scum bussing to create distance. You could be town panicked. I don't know but your behavior is weird.
In post 2374, 72offsuit wrote:2 parts of JV's push against me stink.
1 - when he accused me of logging in at a convenient time despite that time being when i normally log on, which he full well knows bring Aussie himseld and us playing at least 2 games with each other prior to this.
2) This lame scum theatre theory
I went to check this before sleeping but first of all, I don't expect an aussie to log in at almost midnight to start catching up so unless you expect I think every australian stays awake until 4am try again.
Second one is likely if you flip wolf, or if they flip wolf.
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
I think you can find what i think of them in my ISO, it’s pretty much an continuation of that.
but I don't want to read :/
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 2135, Bell wrote:1. That’s not a no or yes.
2. How?
3. That's not arbitrary at all!
1. That's because Siteflaking isn't a scumread. It's a stir shit up vote. If I say no, the logical question is for a case. I don't have one. Yet, siteflaking isn't a gut read either.
2. Voting a non entity that's here might draw attention away from the bickering and get lurker slots to engage. It's already got your attention.
3. My vote is arbitrary because it could apply to several slots.
This is what you said. Stir up shit. Thats not a scumread
In post 2135, Bell wrote:1. That’s not a no or yes.
2. How?
3. That's not arbitrary at all!
1. That's because Siteflaking isn't a scumread. It's a stir shit up vote. If I say no, the logical question is for a case. I don't have one. Yet, siteflaking isn't a gut read either.
2. Voting a non entity that's here might draw attention away from the bickering and get lurker slots to engage. It's already got your attention.
3. My vote is arbitrary because it could apply to several slots.
This is what you said. Stir up shit. Thats not a scumread
Yup. Why don't you just read my ISO further for the explanation of the theory I just reminded you of...
Your play makes me doubt my own theory I had though.
I have a kind of tinfoil where 72 mistook their buddies post for their own but that's just jumping straight to probable stupid logic so Ima just say it now for post-game cred if that was actually the case lmfao.
"Am I a ghost like you, caught between the seams of two intertwining melodies?"
In post 2374, 72offsuit wrote:2 parts of JV's push against me stink.
1 - when he accused me of logging in at a convenient time despite that time being when i normally log on, which he full well knows bring Aussie himseld and us playing at least 2 games with each other prior to this.
2) This lame scum theatre theory
I went to check this before sleeping but first of all, I don't expect an aussie to log in at almost midnight to start catching up so unless you expect I think every australian stays awake until 4am try again.
Second one is likely if you flip wolf, or if they flip wolf.
That just sounds like another excuse to vote for me:
Oh but look how much info ill get from his flip!
Titus, 72 was already scumreading IKS. Hence what he said in 2363. He further clarifies this in 2377.
I think you are both town and JV is breaking my heart.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 2396, JacksonVirgo wrote:I have a kind of tinfoil where 72 mistook their buddies post for their own but that's just jumping straight to probable stupid logic so Ima just say it now for post-game cred if that was actually the case lmfao.
I meant to quote that post. You said you thought that was scum and scum theatre between Yd and myself.
If you are town you are confbiasing with a garbage line of thought.
