Open 794 Pick Your Power X/Y (finished)


User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1027
Joined: August 25, 2020

Post Post #225 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:38 pm

Post by Grumpy Cat »

The biggest reason to keep the higher positions around are because some of them will self-resolve by virtue of being NKed. The numbers do not lie though.

I don't see colours, I only see in 1s and 0s.
User avatar
Hoopla
Hoopla
User avatar
User avatar
Hoopla
Posts: 10788
Joined: October 12, 2008

Post Post #226 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:43 pm

Post by Hoopla »

In post 224, Something_Smart wrote:Also, italicizing
might
is pretty disingenuous. According to your stats DrDolittle for instance has a 30% chance of being mafia. That puts him at a 70% chance of being a town PR, and probably a strong one as well.
in my eyes, the damage scum can do with vigs/PGO's/redirectors etc. is worse than the value a town PR can yield in slot number 1. because if they're town, they're likely to be blocked/NK'ed/redirected etc.

winning top of the draft actually kinda sucks as town since you're a magnet for interference. whereas scum in top slots can wreak havoc because town's tend to leave them unchecked out of fear.

sometimes you have to step up and execute PR's or PR claims to win games.
User avatar
Hoopla
Hoopla
User avatar
User avatar
Hoopla
Posts: 10788
Joined: October 12, 2008

Post Post #227 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:47 pm

Post by Hoopla »

In post 225, Grumpy Cat wrote:The biggest reason to keep the higher positions around are because some of them will self-resolve by virtue of being NKed.
^this is decent a counter-argument to leaving top slots alive.

anyways, this is probably enough naval-gazing theory pontification from me, so i'll let others jump in as i read the thread.
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 23132
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Upstate New York

Post Post #228 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:53 pm

Post by Something_Smart »

Redirector I'll grant, but the thing about scum redirector is they kinda have to claim cop. And then pretty soon you have the issue of, well hold on, why hasn't the claimed cop died yet? And they have to keep giving results and if they're the last scum left those results have to be accurate... and meanwhile the redirector shot is only one-use, and it could end up doing nothing.

With 1-shot vig or 1-shot PGO, sure they can get one kill. Getting more than one kill as PGO is quite unlikely, especially since as you said people tend not to target the higher-ups on the list. But when they have to claim, again they will probably have to claim their real slot, and then it's going to be obvious where the second kill came from.

Roleblocker and jailkeeper I will again grant, but again, if it ever becomes obvious that one of these roles interfered in an action, then the person who claimed the flip side of that role is immediately in trouble. And scum near the top can't just not claim their true slot, because odds are someone down below them tried for it and failed, and if they claim VT then it will, again, probably become apparent.

So I'm really not scared of any of those roles. On the other hand, I am scared of killing a town cop, or a town tracker, or a town doctor, or a town vig, or a town universal backup.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 23132
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Upstate New York

Post Post #229 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:53 pm

Post by Something_Smart »

In post 227, Hoopla wrote:anyways, this is probably enough naval-gazing theory pontification from me
what, you don't like watching boats? :lol:
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #230 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 2:49 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 98, the worst wrote:
In post 69, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Ico
hey talk to me about this? i don't think it was random, and that is a weird and mystical and exciting feeling.
Greeeeeen Cryaoooonnnnnsssss
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #231 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:05 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

I already responded. Twice.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Clover Ebi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 841
Joined: December 26, 2019

Post Post #232 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:21 pm

Post by Clover Ebi »

Hm, Grumpy Cat can you talk to me on why you think scum are less likely to take the stance Green Crayons did? He was the first person I was getting some wolf pings on not because of him going after the fake hammer but because I disliked the reasoning/way they worded it.

I get the reasoning of scum not wanting to take the lead, but I feel like that's more player dependant than anything from what I've seen. I also like hat guy who's name I forget at the moment!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #233 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:23 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

I didn’t fake hammer.

Please read the game.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Clover Ebi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 841
Joined: December 26, 2019

Post Post #234 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:24 pm

Post by Clover Ebi »

I'm also not the type of person to put much value in the placement of a slot on the list besides the number thing mostly because that just seems silly to go for. I mean yeah it gets you some towncred but willingly taking lower numbers? Gosh, that has to make you pretty confident. But there's probably not much to go into on this until later on. :)
pedit: I never said you did?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #235 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:26 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 232, Clover Ebi wrote:Green Crayons did? He was the first person I was getting some wolf pings on not because of him going after the fake hammer but because I disliked the reasoning/way they worded it.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Clover Ebi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 841
Joined: December 26, 2019

Post Post #236 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:26 pm

Post by Clover Ebi »

Your entire iso is about going after the dude who faked it and then you changed your vote, it seemed pretty odd to me because you felt really stubborn about it from when I was reading. Then you go on to make another statement about it that makes it so any kind of defense would be seen in a bad late all while still keeping your vote on Ico. It's just odd to me!
pedit: You're reading it wrong :giggle:
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #237 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 3:35 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh I see.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Umlaut
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6053
Joined: August 3, 2016
Location: Somewhere out there

Post Post #238 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:05 pm

Post by Umlaut »

Okay, I'm starting to read

This is going to be one of those games that hits page 80 halfway through day 1 and I never quite catch up, isn't it
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
and the other kind,
’ and those who
don’t
say. Well, then there’s me.” — J.R. “Bob” Dobbs
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #239 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:15 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 115, Something_Smart wrote:Am I gonna have to bring up the
duck
dragon
elephant in the room regarding Hoopla's plan?

The people toward the top of the list are more likely to have PR's. And, uh, PR's are how you win games.
wait literally anyone was taking her plan seriously?
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #240 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:16 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 138, DrDolittle wrote:Is this gonna be a meme game cause I'm ok with it being a meme game
you always bring the meme
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #241 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:16 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Certainly hope not.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #242 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:17 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 220, Hoopla wrote:an example of how we should use number analysis;

- gypyx is 11th in the draft (a low frequency slot for scum)
- he also chose 11 (a low frequency selection for scum)
- he is also on a doubled up number (an average frequency outcome for scum)

i'd want to be quite confident gypyx is much more likely scum than random if we're to wagon there.
I mean this is fine but don’t know if she was ever really saying let’s elim from top down.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #243 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:17 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 147, iamausername wrote:
In post 115, Something_Smart wrote:Am I gonna have to bring up the
duck
dragon
elephant in the room regarding Hoopla's plan?

The people toward the top of the list are more likely to have PR's. And, uh, PR's are how you win games.
this post feels fake.

VOTE: Something_Smart
I could think of like 3 reasons to vote ss for that post and it feeling fake is probably directly opposite to all of them.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #244 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:18 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 153, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: iamausername
why did you vote username here
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #245 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:19 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 168, Grumpy Cat wrote:hoopla, you better be town this game. I'm sleeping GreyIce if you're scum.
How did you know I was greyice? wow.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #246 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:20 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 172, word321 wrote:I dnt like DrDolittle a.k.a. Doc from now on
VOTE: DrDolittle
This is a fairly poor choice imo
is it a scummy choice? meh
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #247 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:23 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 205, Datisi wrote:i'm getting townpings from ico
no
In post 205, Datisi wrote:s_s and drd are my "my gut is telling me this person is town but i have no reasoning to back it up with" reads
Same
In post 205, Datisi wrote:i have a sorta scumread that i'm gonna sit on for a bit more
is it username or grumplez
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #248 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:24 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 209, Datisi wrote:
In post 167, Grumpy Cat wrote:S_S, Gypyx, Green Crayons, Clover town.
elaborate on green and especially clover?
ohey green I actually liked
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36877
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #249 (ISO) » Mon Aug 31, 2020 4:25 pm

Post by the worst »

In post 211, Grumpy Cat wrote:Green Crayons accurately ascertained Gypyx was faking a reaction after being fakehammered. Scum are less likely to take that accusatory route given they have no reason to think town!Gypyx is lying there, and no one else had seen his reaction as fake.
Gypyx's response was.......very cheesy but yeah I did like that Green was the first person to call this out

Return to “Completed Open Games”