Several problems with thatIn post 2969, JacksonVirgo wrote:Would it be safer to let the real vigi shoot them if real (and risk them being GF/immune) or eliminate them?
How you seem to understand my play more than many who have played me several times before is starting to confuse me. Do I know you by any other name, perhaps?In post 2927, superbowl9 wrote:Okay no yall A50 was just fucking around to get TL to stop harping on that one point. It seems pretty obvious esp. coming from A50 who just pulled a scumclaim reaction test
I initially thought it did, but now that the truth is out; don't you think Scum would already know if their p was targeted by someone with a loud modifier?In post 2929, superbowl9 wrote:Id also like to mention this only further looks bad for town looter
Nope I just get where you’re coming fromIn post 2976, Almost50 wrote:How you seem to understand my play more than many who have played me several times before is starting to confuse me. Do I know you by any other name, perhaps?In post 2927, superbowl9 wrote:Okay no yall A50 was just fucking around to get TL to stop harping on that one point. It seems pretty obvious esp. coming from A50 who just pulled a scumclaim reaction test
In post 2932, Titus wrote:This might just be a sort by post count game.
No u. And I can't find my second damn breadcrumb lol, maybe I just had the intent to do it or something but anywayIn post 2968, superbowl9 wrote:Yep good play. MM def just check with scum chat and they told him to claim vigi to out another PR. Lets elim this
Pedit: you can send it to Bell, he’s our admissions officer
In post 2934, NorwegianboyEE wrote:MM was also a gold member of the: "hating on Nero Cain" club.
We should probably look more at those if MM flip red.
That's what I'm saying. You're more concerned to make your presence known than you are actually reading.In post 2939, JacksonVirgo wrote:Wait how did I miss the fact Fwen claimed a check on MM, looking back I saw that I posted afterwards lmfao
Can you elaborate on this now that I've claimed & crumbed & am un-CCed? Because I'm having doubts on you atm.
ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE! BOOOOOOIn post 2931, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why did you have to be evil.
You red red communist Marshall Zhukov.
LOOK! LOOK! SEE THE OPPRESSION INHERENT TO THE SYSTEM??? HELP!!!! I'M BEING REPRESSED!!!!!!!!!!!!In post 2933, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 2932, Titus wrote:This might just be a sort by post count game.Bow before me peasant.
Yes, unless you're Australian!In post 2943, JacksonVirgo wrote:Does that mean I'm lock-town? plzplzplzIn post 2941, superbowl9 wrote:As ive been sayingIn post 2932, Titus wrote:This might just be a sort by post count game.
Yes they would but i still think trying to push fwes before he spilled his result would make sense from scum, trying to cast doubt on his reportIn post 2977, Almost50 wrote:I initially thought it did, but now that the truth is out; don't you think Scum would already know if their p was targeted by someone with a loud modifier?In post 2929, superbowl9 wrote:Id also like to mention this only further looks bad for town looter
FUCK!In post 2987, Almost50 wrote:Yes, unless you're Australian!In post 2943, JacksonVirgo wrote:Does that mean I'm lock-town? plzplzplzIn post 2941, superbowl9 wrote:As ive been sayingIn post 2932, Titus wrote:This might just be a sort by post count game.
WAIT! You ARE Australian.
Blocking only a modifier would not be allowed in a normal game.In post 2978, superbowl9 wrote:Crumb doesn’t change much imo. The one thing I do wanna bring up is if scum loudblocked fwes to set this up, which I think would point to fwes being red and asking his own team to block him for this scenario. But that’s something we can evaluate if MM flips green which is highly unlikely
That loudblock makes very little sense. If I hadn't been Vigilante in this scenario, Fwesnid would just be really susp because noone would be able to give a loud feedback, unless a scummate commits and claims to have the loud feedback.In post 2978, superbowl9 wrote:Crumb doesn’t change much imo. The one thing I do wanna bring up is if scum loudblocked fwes to set this up, which I think would point to fwes being red and asking his own team to block him for this scenario. But that’s something we can evaluate if MM flips green which is highly unlikely
Thank you, Mr Holmes.In post 2951, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:That... is a terrible post. Unless there's something from Nero that I missed, since he was disloyal, the only way for you to know is to be scum xD
AHAHAHAHA!!In post 2971, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Back then, I was planning on shooting Superbowl (hence why it was in reply to him), but then my read changed. I made another post that I cannot find that was either replying directly to Offsuit or talking about him in which I made the same code (the capital letters of each sentence start spell "VIGI"), since I planned on shooting him. But then he was lynched before I could come to the thread, and Pickaxe Pete's hammer and general lack of content was just... eww, and the info obtained by lynching him would have been basically zero since noone really interacted with him, perhaps minus about me because of my early game super-weak townread on him, so I shot him.In post 859, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Hello, I exist. More catch-up to do, it seems.In post 653, superbowl9 wrote:Yeah your 2 pages are just basic information and not really things that are pushy/pushable, hence why it's IIoA.In post 627, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:In post 453, superbowl9 wrote:I think MM's spew is kinda IIoAyDiscrediting 2 pages of my content without any quotes and labelling them as IIoA and OMGUS? NiceIn post 454, superbowl9 wrote:Not in the traditional way but more in the just put out a bunch of basic level argumentation thats really low hanging fruit type of way if you get me - not saying it's AI yetI know you want me to go point by point through so you can undermine my position, but that literally makes no sense because I'm saying you've been cluttering the thread with basic info. Why would I respond to/elaborate upon that basic info lol?
Also dude you have literally OMGUSed everyone who has slighted you. Idk why you view this as a "discredit" because (at least imo) OMGUS is pretty NAI in most cases but it's just funny to point out when you OMGUS scumread someone then say they're OMGUSing.Very convenient for you lol, you get to not explain your reads!Ithink that's what you wanted, hm?Great discredit again, btw.I'd like you to at least back it up A BIT with some quotes, if you don't mind.
I'm rather saying that I'm un-CCed lol, and there's no CC to bait since noone can CC me..........In post 2988, superbowl9 wrote:Yes they would but i still think trying to push fwes before he spilled his result would make sense from scum, trying to cast doubt on his reportIn post 2977, Almost50 wrote:I initially thought it did, but now that the truth is out; don't you think Scum would already know if their p was targeted by someone with a loud modifier?In post 2929, superbowl9 wrote:Id also like to mention this only further looks bad for town looter
Pedit @MM: well buddy if you actually are vigi then we flip you and get fwesnid in a 1:1 trade, so you’re not gettin out of this. Also stop CC baiting pls, if you want to discuss whether a CC is warranted here then go ahead but yelling “CC ME PLS” is not helping you look any townier
NoIn post 2997, JacksonVirgo wrote:Can scum have a vigi role?
There goes my epic tinfoil
