In post 174, Grumpy Cat wrote:If you're feel hard done by the limited selection of emojis you can use, Flopz, feel free to use the [img] tags to link any animated emojis you find online.
I'd like to ask them to please explain their push on me and what their intention was with it.
I want full honesty, as well as the reason they were shading a few other slots.
alisae I think is town. I will link some posts that I feel display a town mindset(e are by no means locktown but if e stay on the path I may locktown em). E have have the highest impact on the game so far IMO:
Spoiler: Showing a desire to start solving early on by pushing people to explain things. I find this kind of questioning to lean someone town.
In post 22, WindowsXP wrote:I suggest we use the term Uninstall. But perhaps I am just biased.
You've got a lot of nerve just coming into the game making jokes instead of contributing anything. I'd give you a finger of suspicion, but that would make typing hard so I'm going to have to go with a vote instead. VOTE: Windows XP
ok so why vote Flopz in the first place?
I'm confused
In post 139, Alisae wrote:I think Hopkirk shading Flopz isn't something that he would go out of his way to do if they were partners.
I don't think Hopkirk and Grumpy Cat's interactions on page 3-4 about Flopz is theater
And Grumpy Cat's vote on Flopz feels weird to me tbh. Grumpy Cat goes to apply pressure on that slot but Hopkirk is trying to pressure Windows atm.
Thinking about this more its actually really weird. Its a conflict of interest but I don't know if its alignment indicative. Why shade a slot you're not trying to pressure? And wouldn't something like that be better to keep to yourself when the slot hasn't posted yet and you don't have information to go off of?
Like it seems weird but what interest me is you shading Flopz but not wanting to put pressure onto them, but Grumpy Cat decides to put pressure on it.
Also in general, I feel like Grumpy Cat's actions here seem like they're indicative of reacting to the events happening around him and not really trying to put anything together himself? He jumps on the Flopz wagon to then be swayed by Hopkirk to join the Windows wagon and it just seems weird to me
Spoiler: genuine frustration at wanting people to be open about their intents
In post 69, Grumpy Cat wrote:Was he scum in that game, Hop? That's some useful meta, thanks.
Idk. I don't really want to reread the game because he was so toxic in it that I really don't want to reread it (and the mod didn't update the first post with roles or anything smh).
Oh damn, I wouldn't be opposed to policy launching him then it becomes a serious issue? We should put some pressure on him to make sure he behaves.
now grumpycat is a slot I've been watching and I have a bit of suspicion of them.
and their interactions with hop are......weird, even if they are friends. there's the theory that a scum team of hop/grumpy would be trying to force a mutual townread early on so that there is justification on day 3 to not push on eachother. A lot of grumpy's posts give me WIFOM vibes. At the very least it would be most plausible that Grumpy is attempting to pocket hopkirk if they are friends/ friendly with eachother.
In post 52, Hopkirk wrote:It's the standard American spelling. I'm assuming you, like most people, are living in America. Streuth, in an American game like this I kind of have to adopt the lingo mate.
I think we should try to move away from this type of low effort posting. Could anyone who agrees please quote my post then say 'I agree' (nothing else obviously).
In post 63, Hopkirk wrote:Screw you then. I was trying to not get super agressive and toxic this game but you're not giving me much option. Really making me regret trying to extend an olive branch and having you spit on my face and punch me repeatedly in the throat.
i am sur u r scum
im not moving my vote until Hop is dead guys
VOTE: Hop[/v[
In post 69, Grumpy Cat wrote:Was he scum in that game, Hop? That's some useful meta, thanks.
In post 69, Grumpy Cat wrote:Was he scum in that game, Hop? That's some useful meta, thanks.
Idk. I don't really want to reread the game because he was so toxic in it that I really don't want to reread it (and the mod didn't update the first post with roles or anything smh).
Oh damn, I wouldn't be opposed to policy launching him then it becomes a serious issue? We should put some pressure on him to make sure he behaves.
In post 81, Hopkirk wrote:I didn't like any of their second or third post. First was a NAI naked vote. The joke about uninstall felt a little tonally off, like sure it's a reasonable joke but leaving the thread after felt kind of meh. The post in 33 I disliked the mindset too and I'd like to pressure them a bit yeah.
Fair, but if he flips scum, I'm going after you for this obvious bus
In post 89, Grumpy Cat wrote:I feel like the scumteam are scared of the pure solving power we're exhibiting right and I don't really blame them
Flopz especially is heavy lurking. He usually has around 200 posts and has got into 2 or 3 toxic 1v1s by now
There's also that general air of "not really trying to solve and just fucking around" I get from GC. It is still early on and they can feel free to prove me wrong but so far I think they are scum trying to wifom.
In post 43, Hopkirk wrote:They have basically no posts and have stopped. Complaining 'half their iso' is spent on it isn't a good way to move past this.
I am certainly not looking to further discuss the matter itself, but why would I ignore Alisae's butting in? And why does it seem important to you that I do?
Because it's not game related and you've posted nothing game related.
I still don't like your dismissal of my entire line of questioning. How is it not potentially indicative of alignment if Alisae is showing cognitive dissonance while going out of eir way to pick fights about non-game content during the Random Voting Stage?
In post 184, WindowsXP wrote:At the very least it would be most plausible that Grumpy is attempting to pocket hopkirk if they are friends/ friendly with eachother.
Interesting you would think this; I had the opposite impression.
In post 184, WindowsXP wrote:At the very least it would be most plausible that Grumpy is attempting to pocket hopkirk if they are friends/ friendly with eachother.
Interesting you would think this; I had the opposite impression.
In post 184, WindowsXP wrote:At the very least it would be most plausible that Grumpy is attempting to pocket hopkirk if they are friends/ friendly with eachother.
Interesting you would think this; I had the opposite impression.
In post 189, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:I mean if there is a pocketing attempt in your exchange with Hopkirk I don't think it is coming from you.
In post 19, Alisae wrote:Like you decided to be the word police, so I'm questioning why you decided to be the word police.
Am I not allowed to do that?
Who is policing whom? I made a passing remark to a player who is not you, to which they replied cordially. You have spent half your ISO defending your right to be obstinate, while positing that I am an instigator, and ironically implying that I am too personally invested.
you are so incredibly defensive about this it's actually pinging me
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 17, Piergeiron the Paladinson wrote:The historical connotation does not translate well into the context of the game, and has potential to personally offend some users. I find it odd that you would choose to argue about something not-game-related you presumably do not care for, but this is not the time nor the place for such discussion.
In post 19, Alisae wrote:Like you decided to be the word police, so I'm questioning why you decided to be the word police.
Am I not allowed to do that?
Let's keep this all above board friends, there's no need to start an argument over this. Why don't we keep this type of discussion to a seperate thread
i... disagree? I think (hope?) ali was onto more then just the core of the discussion here
I really dislike the paladin coming out of that discussion, and not for reasons related to actual content of discussion
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 127, WindowsXP wrote:also ive been toying with the idea of NLing until D3 while i was working.
Cons: we lose a ML
Pros: getting within 2 scum is easier
Overall the mechanic makes a 2 scum lylo much more dangerous for scum since by then one scum has been poed minimum.
Would like to hear other's thoughts on this.
exactly how serious are you with this suggestion? and what size is your neck?
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
Please ignore what you've heard. I've literally played 2 games here and stopped after that because of the toxicity. I was hoping it might be better this time but maybe not
oh man i hope you aren't seeing toxicity in this game right now because… there isn't any. Yet.
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 155, Grumpy Cat wrote:New ping: Alisae getting oddly defensive when telling em it was a joke.
Why didn't you vote me if I felt off to you, Ali?
do you have any buttons left unpushed, grumpy?
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 127, WindowsXP wrote:also ive been toying with the idea of NLing until D3 while i was working.
Cons: we lose a ML
Pros: getting within 2 scum is easier
Overall the mechanic makes a 2 scum lylo much more dangerous for scum since by then one scum has been poed minimum.
Would like to hear other's thoughts on this.
exactly how serious are you with this suggestion? and what size is your neck?
About 20% serious. It would be interesting to pursue the validity of such a strategy sometime but I understand most will not go for it. Interesting you latched onto this post of mine. Are you an ego player by any chance?
Spoiler:
Rawr!
We play mafia 
