Micro 966 - DDD: DD? [game over!]

[Iconeum]

yo windows

let's start over?

[WindowsXP]

I'm parking my vote here while I sleep. Feel free to prove me wrong via your actions. I'm not interested in a 1v1.

[Donempire]

Hiiii everyone I've taken a long sabbatical since the mess that was my Team Mafia game to try and rekindle my enjoyment of Mafia as a whole. I hope we can all get along and not instantly turn to s***-slinging as I find that really takes the fun out of the game

We'll start off with a nice VOTE: Ico. You were a good doc, it was a shame about the rest of TM

Shitslinging is the name of the game
You either lolhammer or get lolhammered, no inbetween
Pussy plays get punished this game

[Iconeum]

I'm truly not seeing much in that 1v1 you called out. You can think it's scummy, and that someone is trying to pocket someone else. I don't see it. That should be sufficient answer.

I'm absolutely trying to engage with you in good faith, if it appears like i'm not, that's probably because just do'nt know each other yet.

[Donempire]

yo windows

let's start over?

Windows startup sound??? :Lol: :XD: :ifunny:

[WindowsXP]

[Iconeum]

I believe there is no productive conversation to be had with someone who refuses to engage in good faith.

I took a look at WHAT you exactly decided to respond to - on top of your refusal when prodded to - to respond to something I thought was important, as scummy.

I responded to what I wanna respond to. Feel free to draw your opinion on that.

As for the RVS comment? - It's not RVS. And you are lying that you are truly treating it as RVS from your shade on Paladin. It was page 8 when you got on. Just because YOU were late doesn't mean we waited to end RVS with you. So stop playing entitled.

I'm not sure why you are so eager to have me respond *solely* to game relevant stuff? If you think that because it's page 8 i'm not gonna joke around, you are wrong. I'll be joking around for the majority of the game.

You are more excited to respond to things that are non game related. As a recent example you recently just latched onto my claim that I read a few of your recent games. I did actually. Mainly for alignment + early game play to see patterns.

From all possible examples, me latching on to that is very much game relevant. I really wanna know exactly which games you skimmed. Because I know my own games, and therefore I know you are either lying about them, or absolutely didn't read em.

Overall, if you are town stop playing like you are entitled to being townread because it's going to end in you getting policied. And I am not interested in any AtE. That shit does not work on me.

I really don't know what ur seeing here dude. I'm not saying I should be townread? I'm not trying to be townread? I'm not sure where this is coming from tbh. Either ur faking it to push a fake scumread on me, or you don't know how to play this game.

[Iconeum]

ok windows, i truthfully answered everything you wanna know.

Now, please just provide that list of game(s) you skimmed of mine?

[Alisae]

it's pretty Obvious where i'm voting now, right?

VOTE: Dong you think you can policy lynch me?

why are you RVSing when you have a read you want to pressure?

[Alisae]

To be honest, your recent spam of posts are not actually very helpful and just reacting to random things.

I don’t mind this take

[Iconeum]

why are you RVSing when you have a read you want to pressure?

because i want to

[Alisae]

so windows

your thoughts are literally:

-ask ico to give thoughts on 2 slots
-ico says no
->ico clearly has scum motivation for this

how?

Ok so why do you not want to give your thoughts on 2 slots?

[Ydrasse]

i am very tired but i get the feeling ico wants 2 be the "rational" one here wrt windows and is trying to take the steps to appear so. also i think the insistence that windows provide the games they reviewed feels like a setup to catch windows in a gotcha. it's a weird thing to keep asking abt

VOTE: ico

[Alisae]

Also, icos behaviour is so far in line with his towngame. I dont doubt it

what stands out to you?

[Alisae]

alisae what's your thoughts on paladin?

he’s probably going to be annoying

[Alisae]

I'm truly not seeing much in that 1v1 you called out. You can think it's scummy, and that someone is trying to pocket someone else. I don't see it. That should be sufficient answer.

I'm absolutely trying to engage with you in good faith, if it appears like i'm not, that's probably because just do'nt know each other yet.

Icon from what I’m seeing, I think you are acting completely unreasonable and WindowsXP is the reasonable one here.

[Alisae]

why are you RVSing when you have a read you want to pressure?

because i want to

And I want to vote you
So I’m going to go do that
VOTE: Icon

[Iconeum]

so windows

your thoughts are literally:

-ask ico to give thoughts on 2 slots
-ico says no
->ico clearly has scum motivation for this

how?

Ok so why do you not want to give your thoughts on 2 slots?

i *have* given my thoughts on what he asked

[Alisae]

so windows

your thoughts are literally:

-ask ico to give thoughts on 2 slots
-ico says no
->ico clearly has scum motivation for this

how?

Ok so why do you not want to give your thoughts on 2 slots?

i *have* given my thoughts on what he asked

can you quote it? I might have missed it

[Iconeum]

i am very tired but i get the feeling ico wants 2 be the "rational" one here wrt windows and is trying to take the steps to appear so. also i think the insistence that windows provide the games they reviewed feels like a setup to catch windows in a gotcha. it's a weird thing to keep asking abt

VOTE: ico

windows is using those games as a reason to justify saying my actions are pointing towards scum!ico

i'm very much going to use it as a 'gotcha' once he posts them, because it's a flat out lie

[Iconeum]

ali, you quoted my answer yourself in 265. Windows is coming from a point where it's seeing something fishy in the 1v1 he asked me my thoughts about. I responded with an answer that says I don't really see much fuss in that 1v1. You can't make me give thoughts about something that are literally not there.

[Ydrasse]

ok, i do not think we are getting an answer on those games tn though so i will be sleeping now

[Iconeum]

i am very tired but i get the feeling ico wants 2 be the "rational" one here wrt windows and is trying to take the steps to appear so. also i think the insistence that windows provide the games they reviewed feels like a setup to catch windows in a gotcha. it's a weird thing to keep asking abt

VOTE: ico

ydrasse this bothers me some. You should have no problem with me being so persistent in asking those games because it can only go 2 ways for you:

-either i'm right, and he didn't actually skim those games -> lying -> fabricating a fake case on me

or

-he comes up with actual proof that he *already has* according to itself -> feel free to use that as justfication for voting me


but voting me *because* i'm asking those games is ehhhh

[Alisae]

I’m going to rephrase my question, because you didn’t really answer my question.
Ok so when you wrote post 220, why did you not want to give your thoughts on the 2 slots that were mentioned? Because prior to that, you did not do that (hence why windows had to ask) unless I missed something before 220?

[Iconeum]

well that's kinda my point?

I didn't just spam this game, I did a catchup like i'll be doing every time I come online. I commented on what I wanted to comment on. If I didn't comment on that 1v1, it's because I didn't find it interesting.

Could I have given a far cleaner and nicer answer to windows by saying it like this? Sure. Do I feel like he deserved getting a more crappy response from me? Yes, because of how windows was treating me.