He he he, you may wanna look at what a Jester does again mate.In post 298, Almost50 wrote:I am also positive the Wolf pack voted the Jester (and will vote him here too).They get TWO KILLs if he is eliminated, so why not?
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
He he he, you may wanna look at what a Jester does again mate.In post 298, Almost50 wrote:I am also positive the Wolf pack voted the Jester (and will vote him here too).They get TWO KILLs if he is eliminated, so why not?
you might want to actuallyIn post 300, ItalianoVD wrote:He he he, you may wanna look at what a Jester does again mate.In post 298, Almost50 wrote:I am also positive the Wolf pack voted the Jester (and will vote him here too).They get TWO KILLs if he is eliminated, so why not?
You're confusing it with Wolf Pup.In post 298, Almost50 wrote:I am also positive the Wolf pack voted the Jester (and will vote him here too). They get TWO KILLs if he is eliminated, so why not?
Same effect, smart panties. If we cannot eliminate by day that's a double night with double kills.In post 300, ItalianoVD wrote:He he he, you may wanna look at what a Jester does again mate.In post 298, Almost50 wrote:I am also positive the Wolf pack voted the Jester (and will vote him here too).They get TWO KILLs if he is eliminated, so why not?
*Sigh* If you can't eliminate on the following day then it's effectively a double kill night. Two successive night with one kill eavj with no day-elimination in between.In post 304, Pine wrote:You're confusing it with Wolf Pup.In post 298, Almost50 wrote:I am also positive the Wolf pack voted the Jester (and will vote him here too). They get TWO KILLs if he is eliminated, so why not?
It depends on your role I guess.In post 307, Galron wrote:I'll ask again, if I were provable Town and IVD were provable Jester, which elimination would win us the game?
Fair counter point. I'm never beyond being corrected and I'm willing to put a bit of faith in this here since it isn't a massively strong read; I can choose to believe that I misinterpreted you or took it to a conclusion you didn't mean. But the last paragraph pisses me off on a personal level and is childish. It comes across as, "I'm not gonna talk to you until you get on my level." That's just uncalled for. A major part of this game is interacting with people you're not on the same wavelength with.In post 296, insomnia wrote:I never once said I wouldn't get involved in mechanics, you're painting it out to be like that. I just don't know if it's because you're a wrong villager or a wolf yet.In post 292, Glitch wrote:In this game, spending time understanding the mechanics and game setup is the best way to catch scum. A lack of interest in that seems scummy. You asked who you were sheeping; but you clearly and distinctly said you werent gonna bother understanding mechanics and just roll with whatever A50 said. I get A50 is really townie but that doesn't resolve each player of all their town duties. Unless they don't have town duties.In post 278, insomnia wrote:I'm trying to figure out why you would say that just because I'm not engaging into mechanics than that makes me lazy and therefore scum, when I have plenty of other posts and thoughts on the game that you're ignoring. Mainly the fact that you wanted Italiano balloted in that post and I'm the one that twisted the key into that engine.
Your argument back at me feels pretty OMGUSy.
One thing I know for sure is that you aren't doing a good job of reading my posts. I said I'd take it if A50 were cop checked so that I wouldn't have to bother with mechanics and follow his mechanical sage advice.
We probably won't fit well in this game together because we think differently of the game on a fundamental level so I won't really reply to you anymore unless I think you're a villager. For now I think you're moderately wolfy and discussing with you isn't really productive for anyone.
This question just feels off. I can't put my finger on it but this feels manipulative. If you have a gambit or a way to figure out what's best for the town, can you stop stalling and just do it?In post 307, Galron wrote:I'll ask again, if I were provable Town and IVD were provable Jester, which elimination would win us the game?
In post 313, Galron wrote:I won't be role claiming. I'm going to check that I'm ready to move on.
In post 202, Almost50 wrote:A-1: 7-3-1 >> 5-3-1 >> 3-3-1 GAME OVER
A-2: 7-3-1 >> 6-3-0 >> 4-3-0 E-Lo
B: 8-3-0 >> 6-3-0 >> 4-3-0 E-Lo
C: 8-2-1 >> 6-2-1 >> 4-2-1 >> 3-2-0 E-Lo
D: 9-2-0 >> 7-2-0 >> 5-2-0 >> 3-2-0 E-Lo
These are all possible scenarios (T-W-3P). I so not believe the top 1 is at all likely, but I considered both eliminating the Jester and not.
B & X are more likely now (depending on whether Italiano is Scum or Jester). eliminating him today ensures we don't lose before D4 (worst case scenario). If we are in D we probably are on auto win if we eliminate Italiano today.
[img]index.jpeg[/img]
He even did the work for you. Did anyone read these? Did anyone think about these?In post 226, Almost50 wrote:Let me think aloud..
Assuming worst case scenario; we are in 7-3-1. We need to eliminate a WOLF or we will lose. Why? because with a miselimination coupled with a NK we would be in a 5-3-1 situation. We cannot afford to eliminate the Jester then, but scum can 9and probably will). They get 2 NKs and win as they reach parity with the town. They could also let us put Italiano on the ballot (tomorrow) and pit him against a townie, so we can choose between going into the night with 5-3 (and them having 2 NKs) or going into the night as 4-3-1 (and them having one NK). Now if we do eliminate the Jester today we would be at 7-3 going into the night (with the Wolves having 2 NKs) which means we are 5-3 tomorrow. Still not an ideal situation and I don't know what to do at this point.
So, do we take our chances and aim for a WOLF today?
You don't get it.In post 315, Glitch wrote:In post 313, Galron wrote:I won't be role claiming. I'm going to check that I'm ready to move on.fascinating
If I were Town gladiated against a Jester, I'd campaign for my own vote. You're the one who doesn't get it, Wolf friend.In post 316, Galron wrote:Not a gambit. Trying to get people to think about this. If it's Town vs. Jester, which is the better elimination? I don't think anyone is thinking this through except for maybe A50, and he's looking at worst case.
this doesnt make me want to elim you any lessIn post 313, Galron wrote:I won't be role claiming. I'm going to check that I'm ready to move on.
In post 299, CreativeMod1 wrote:In post 297, Almost50 wrote:.
@MOD: Would it be possible for one to request that you PM them their own voting history?I'll reply to this shortly
WeyounsLastClone has been prodded and has 24 hours to make a post
HiIn post 301, WeyounsLastClone wrote:
A bit too late since we're in ballot phase already, but Fuzzylogic, in post 60 you mention 'might be waiting to catch both ww before claiming'. Do we know for sure we have only two ww? Or are you discounting potential defector?
Galron if you aren't going to claim there is a possibility you might get eliminated today, and if there's a way in which you are trying to protect town by not claiming it might be worth instead claiming so that we don't kill a potentially useful townie??In post 318, Galron wrote:You don't get it.In post 315, Glitch wrote:In post 313, Galron wrote:I won't be role claiming. I'm going to check that I'm ready to move on.fascinating