Cheers, I always wondered how that workedIn post 448, Grumpy Cat wrote:I forgot how good your sig was lul. Go into settings and make it so your sig is attached to all your posts, duffer
From the top left:
User Control Panel>Board Preferences>Edit posting defaults>Attach my signature by default
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: I am not happy that Ico was hammered so soon, but they were a good PL regardless the way they were playing entitled.
Those are very interesting to read side-by-side, those two statements seem a bit disanalogous to me ngl as the first statement kind of doesn't really work with the second being a thing. Unlike Alisae, you're not saying "oops I didn't mean to"In post 419, WindowsXP wrote:I will say that it is my fault for not announcing L-2.
In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: I think there is still scum within hopkirk/GC.
That's actually amazing to read. It's like I'm reading a book that contains a list of the most hilarious two subsequent posts. How do you talk about Ico dying while somehow ignoring the post right next to it that explains the poor death of Hopkirk?In post 419, WindowsXP wrote:Oh. Lol. Hop died. That might change some dynamics.
As you don't want to reveal your alt (which also means you don't have to show any proof), when you say gameS, do you mean multiple games or just one? Better yet, can you say how many games you've both been in together. Nobody is going to super-sleath and go through all of Icos games to see all of the people they've played with and then try to narrow that down so you'll be safe, I give my scout's honour on that.In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: Also as for the games i "read". I must come clean and say I did lie and was using games that we both played in and was trying to apply meta. At the very least i wanted to get them to make some concrete stances that werent rooted in some 1v1.
Why on earth did you feel that you were likely to die? I really want to know the trail of logic for that one.In post 417, WindowsXP wrote: I expected to likely die(no dead thread pm ): ) so i didn't bother using my free time i had between work shifts to draft anything up, but I will look through everyone at some point whenever i can.
Ask me whatever you want and I'll answer it, just promise not to use the word "launch" and we'll be goldenIn post 419, WindowsXP wrote:I'd also like to hear more from flopz.
I have a big thinking react regarding your slot. I have a little meta on you so I'm looking forward to your thoughts so we can get into some analysis.In post 451, Ydrasse wrote:i haven't forgotten that i was gonna post here but i got caught up doing other things so expect something from me tomorrow where i have the will to sit down and try to process stuff
I would like some meta to verify thisIn post 455, WindowsXP wrote:As for the hopkirk thing, I nearly never check any posts before posting my daystart thoughts.
Nice tryIn post 459, Alisae wrote:I would like some meta to verify thisIn post 455, WindowsXP wrote:As for the hopkirk thing, I nearly never check any posts before posting my daystart thoughts.
can you at least post the cliff notes version?In post 451, Ydrasse wrote:i haven't forgotten that i was gonna post here but i got caught up doing other things so expect something from me tomorrow where i have the will to sit down and try to process stuff
Its really strange to believe. I'm having a hard time trying to read into this a bit because I really want to but I know I shouldn't, but having some meta to verify this would be VERY niceIn post 460, WindowsXP wrote:Nice tryIn post 459, Alisae wrote:I would like some meta to verify thisIn post 455, WindowsXP wrote:As for the hopkirk thing, I nearly never check any posts before posting my daystart thoughts.
Your two big leading active drives were on both Ico and Hopkirk who both ended up as being town.In post 458, WindowsXP wrote:and re: being likely to die: I'm active. I drive conversation. I ask questions. I lead. It's a no brainer to have me as a potential kill targettarget. I have been N1d and N2d as VT many times.
the flip is in the pmIn post 463, WindowsXP wrote:Either you believe me or you don't. It is my meta and I stand by it. I check my pms, see if im dead, then post in thread wrt thoughts about hammer especially if i wasnt around for it.
Stop derailing the thread with this pointless inquiry.
You didn't even do it though...did you hit submit after changing the settings?In post 450, Flopz wrote:Cheers, I always wondered how that workedIn post 448, Grumpy Cat wrote:I forgot how good your sig was lul. Go into settings and make it so your sig is attached to all your posts, duffer
From the top left:
User Control Panel>Board Preferences>Edit posting defaults>Attach my signature by default
Basically what Flopz said. In general, this is fine, but this game in particular Ico went down saying you were 85% scum or whatever. If I'm in your position, I'm gonna be anticipating the suspicion I'll be getting from the next day from Ico's vindicators, I certainly wouldn't be imagining getting nightkilled by any stretch.In post 458, WindowsXP wrote:and re: being likely to die: I'm active. I drive conversation. I ask questions. I lead. It's a no brainer to have me as a potential kill targettarget. I have been N1d and N2d as VT many times.
This is absolutely insane btw and respect for forum mafiaing through while doing so <3In post 452, WindowsXP wrote:I'm working 15 hour days all this weekend sorry!
Clearly i didnt read it carefully then.In post 466, Alisae wrote:the flip is in the pmIn post 463, WindowsXP wrote:Either you believe me or you don't. It is my meta and I stand by it. I check my pms, see if im dead, then post in thread wrt thoughts about hammer especially if i wasnt around for it.
Stop derailing the thread with this pointless inquiry.