Open 90 - Trendy and Subversive C9 Mafia Wins! before 656

[sekinj]

Fos: Az

lurking for the win

[sekinj]

Yay! page 2!!

[strife220]

Strife: Was you vote on retro random or serious? i thought it was serious since you said the random stuff wasn't going anywhere. But your later questioning of mirth's suspicions make me think you thougt you were being random.

It was neither random nor serious. Voting the person who doubles up votes in the random stage is almost a cliche, and no posting for 36 hours means the game needed a kick. Comments about how strong a scum-tell it is were sarcastic.
Mirth's response was interesting
Mirth: You definitely need to elaborate more on both your reason for Voting Farside and your reason for expressing suspicion in me.

[sekinj]

no posting for 36 hours means the game needed a kick.

qft

[Mirth]

Strife you're making me a tad suspicious by calling the vote "obligatory." No one is obligating you to do anything. And the second part of it, where you make a joke, bothers me because your vote is clearly non-random, yet you're trying to play down your own reason (ditto with the obilgatory). I take no issue with voting for someone seriously for null tells, but I do take issue with not owning up to actions. This is what your post seems like to me. I am, however, a bit more interested in Farside right now. My reason there is very simple, but I will not say it until I see how Farside reacts to me.

I'd also like to hear from the other three people who haven't posted recently.

[strife220]

Strife you're making me a tad suspicious by calling the vote "obligatory." No one is obligating you to do anything. And the second part of it, where you make a joke, bothers me because your vote is clearly non-random, yet you're trying to play down your own reason (ditto with the obilgatory). I take no issue with voting for someone seriously for null tells, but I do take issue with not owning up to actions. This is what your post seems like to me.

I hear the random voting stage is for random voting.

[Mirth]

Strife you're making me a tad suspicious by calling the vote "obligatory." No one is obligating you to do anything. And the second part of it, where you make a joke, bothers me because your vote is clearly non-random, yet you're trying to play down your own reason (ditto with the obilgatory). I take no issue with voting for someone seriously for null tells, but I do take issue with not owning up to actions. This is what your post seems like to me.

I hear the random voting stage is for random voting.

Not random when you back it up with a reason, no matter how flimsy. And have I mentioned I hate RVS?

[strife220]

The reason for my random vote wasn't good enough?

vote: Farside

. You're on to my evil plan therefore I can't let you live

Real good reason right there.

The sarcasm dripping from my vote post implies that my reason was no reason at all - hence, random voting.

[Mirth]

You cited his 2nd vote. That is an actual reason.

[Greasy Spot]

Players:

Azrael001 (1) (iamausername)
sekinj (1) (retrowiz)
retrowiz (1) (strife220)
farside22 (1) (Mirth)


Not Voting: Azrael001, sekinj, farside22

7 Alive = 4 votes needed to Lynch

[retrowiz]

unvote. Vote Strife

same reason, wrong name beside it.

[retrowiz]

unvote

now that my origiginal vote is corrected I can remove it...never played a 7person game before...random voting is scary now.

first voter is suspicious.
second voter is bandwagoning
third voter is the l-1
fourth voter is hammer dropper

[Mirth]

I do not understand this. You vote Strife (same reason as what?) and immeadiately unvote? Why? Who ever said anything about the first voter being suspicious?

[retrowiz]

vote:sekinj

for posting first.

this vote had the wrong name beside it.

no one said it was suspicious, I was just pointing out that in a 7 player game, every vote gets someones finger pointing in there direction

[retrowiz]

like I said, I unvoted beacuse I can't throw around votes like candy like I normally might, in a 7 player I gotta have something...even if random.

[Mirth]

Sooooo you're going to change your voting patterns so it doesn't look bad in a 7 player? Yet you claim you wrote the wrong name beside your vote?

[farside22]

It was only sort of a joke and not random. I find it interesting that you only now pick up on that particular post after Strife already mentioned it. Any explanation why you only comment after he did?

Strife: In all seriousness now, I think you're being a bit hasty and this strikes me as suspicious. I am, however, not going to vote you (yet) because I'm leaving my vote on Farside for a reason.

Did you notice I posted 3 minutes after your comment to strife about me? I didn't even notice it when I typed my first comment to you. We may have been typing about the same time, but I get distracted as I do this while I'm "working".

[Mirth]

Fair enough. As to why I'm voting you:

Since I've been in a bunch of games with you, I've come to realize that you're darned hard to get a read on either way. Thought I'd vote you and see how you react. Congratulations, you pass for now.

unvote:Farside

[farside22]

Fair enough. As to why I'm voting you:

Since I've been in a bunch of games with you, I've come to realize that you're darned hard to get a read on either way. Thought I'd vote you and see how you react. Congratulations, you pass for now.

unvote:Farside

I've decided to just vote you from here on in if you are going to follow me. I think I need a bodyguard.
Seriously it's not like I was worried about it. I just thought the second comment was weird.
retrowiz: You are not making any sense. Why would you care that you voted for the wrong person? A second vote is a BW but if someone quickly follows that vote that to me would be a BW vote and someone I would look very suspicious.

[Mirth]

The second comment was intentially weird. Was trying to see if I could get a freaked out reaction from you.

[retrowiz]

@ mirth. Yup. my first post in this game I voted for sek for posting first, when it was actually strife who posted first. and yeah...for a smaller game I will change my voting pattern. hell all my strats change cause we're now in like a day 3 or 4 equivalent as opposed to the actual random stage we're in...assuming we are still random.

I will reserve my vote for actual suspects in this game, personally I am out of random stage. my hunt has begin.

[iamausername]

So after all that confusion, I'd like to point out that retrowiz was actually right originally; sekinj posted first, not strife. And if you were going for who

voted

first, it's still not strife, it's me.

On that subject, sekinj. No random vote. Why not?

If I wasnt happy with my vote on Farside I'd be voting you now, Strife.

What happened to this, Mirth? You've dropped your vote on farside, and yet I don't see no strife vote.

[retrowiz]

arrrrgggghhh....I was going for first to post. I dont seem to know which way is up today.

[sekinj]

cuase I think random voting is stuuupid.

[farside22]

cuase I think random voting is stuuupid.

It can be informative and in a 7 player game with 4 votes to lynch it can be very interesting to see how and what people react to when voted for.