In post 570, shellyc wrote:Ok Hot Take: I scumread Egix96 now.
81 is fence-sitting on Arthur’s Alignment
fluffposting until 186 which is mainly prodding people to give their thoughts + IIoA
235 hard defends arthur which is super weird especially if arthur is red
350 CLATS (confirmed lurker and therefore scum) vanity vote on lurker isnt giving any game advancing info?
357 is subtle shade at mundivore whos pretty town so far?
like overall i dont feel like this is a very protown iso and egix has been fallen under the radar
this makes me reconsider worsty tbh
arthur is still scum
81 - Tbf that was quite early in the game, and would you rather if I had created unnecessary bias by not stating both sides of the argument?
186 - I get it if you think that that last paragraph seemed IIoA-ish, but you can see how it was jusitifed by my first impression of Satis.
235 - Come on, you can hardly say that this is a hard defence. It's not like I'm saying, "ArthurConyl is town and here are 13 reasons why!"
350 - How is this not game-advancing? I'm sure there's at least one person who wouldn't have considered the problem I was addressing had I not brought it up.
357 - So what, you'd rather I had just kept that thought to myself? IF Mundi is scum, I'm sure you can imagine how unfortunate that could end up being further down the line, yes?
Also, seeing as you like to talk about your own playstyle a lot...
"egix has been fallen under the radar"
I usually am quite UTR on D1 of games, which is something you should have inferred from reading my posts since I did touch on the subject in an earlier post of mine.
Also also, why did you say this before?
Look, if you're gonna write a case on me and bend the truth in an effort to make it have more clout, you could at least try and make it more believable.