im re-evaluatingIn post 3629, Hectic wrote:shelly, what changed from this stance? Recently, you've been calling UNOwen town for the same reasons I have, but the reasons I'm giving for him being town (voting and associating himself with Noraa) are actually the reasons you thought he was scum before.
why do I randomly bus a UTR scumIn post 3632, Hectic wrote:I guess shelly could've been bussing Noraa because the gamestate had Noraa at a nearly universal townread, so nothing shelly could've done or said would cause Noraa any harm.
lets look back across the gameIn post 3659, PlusJOYED wrote:shellys scumgame is very good but her towngame is questionable.
Really? I thought it was the complete opposite. Your town game is more chill/less aggressive but you have weird reads that get you launched.In post 3674, shellyc wrote:you love meta rightIn post 3663, Hectic wrote:That's another fabricated thought process that no town has there.
I should compile a list of them across the game.
you know clearly that my scumgame is measured and sensible, maybe even more logical than towngame
towngame is emotional and impulsive and all over the place
do you think me who makes reads and thoughts emotionally = consistent logic
as either alignment it is not easy for me to provide coherency in my thoughts
exactlyIn post 3647, Hectic wrote:She says "actually" eventually but having the thought in the first place is just... not possible for any townie which thinks about it for more than 2 seconds. There is a claimed guilty, 1 of the two of them is scum. Scum kills the person claiming a guilty on them to confirm themselves as scum??? No. This is not a genuine thought. This is fake bravado which scum like to throw out, like "watch when I die, kill this person" kind of thing.
i have a conscious effort to make myself more likeable as scumIn post 3679, Hectic wrote:Really? I thought it was the complete opposite. Your town game is more chill/less aggressive but you have weird reads that get you launched.In post 3674, shellyc wrote:you love meta rightIn post 3663, Hectic wrote:That's another fabricated thought process that no town has there.
I should compile a list of them across the game.
you know clearly that my scumgame is measured and sensible, maybe even more logical than towngame
towngame is emotional and impulsive and all over the place
do you think me who makes reads and thoughts emotionally = consistent logic
as either alignment it is not easy for me to provide coherency in my thoughts
Your scum game is really aggressive and a lot more confident, you still have the weird reads but people like them more when it comes with that tone.
Not really true, bussing UTR scum if you can make it look genuine is great for distancing.In post 3676, shellyc wrote:why do I randomly bus a UTR scumIn post 3632, Hectic wrote:I guess shelly could've been bussing Noraa because the gamestate had Noraa at a nearly universal townread, so nothing shelly could've done or said would cause Noraa any harm.
when they're not likely to get flipped
its -ev to bus UTR scum. i am like blatantly obviously not scum with noraa
Based on time stamps in your other games, I'm pretty sure you do stream of consciousness/post without you think as both alignments.In post 3680, shellyc wrote:exactlyIn post 3647, Hectic wrote:She says "actually" eventually but having the thought in the first place is just... not possible for any townie which thinks about it for more than 2 seconds. There is a claimed guilty, 1 of the two of them is scum. Scum kills the person claiming a guilty on them to confirm themselves as scum??? No. This is not a genuine thought. This is fake bravado which scum like to throw out, like "watch when I die, kill this person" kind of thing.
as town I dont think twice before I post, really I do stream of consciousnesses a LOT of times
noraa can be aggressive. im gonna redirect you to newbie 2028 where she tunnelled someone for almost the whole day.In post 3686, Hectic wrote:But you what'd explain that shift? A scum-shelly-partner coaching and teaching her about her signature aggressiveness.
why is UNO fence-sitting againIn post 3633, UNOwen wrote:Shelly claiming specific N3 tracker is pretty convenient and I agree that it only makes sense as a scum play if she is trying to save dave from death. I have not had a chance to look at her ISO yet but she interacted with Noraa loads and quite aggressively, it's difficult to imagine scum being so confident doing that. Maybe on review my mind will change.
How does a 1-shot tracker find conftown when there are presumably two scum left?In post 3671, shellyc wrote: I have never rolled TPR on this site until this game, i play chat mafia and had not much concept of crumbing
I said before. i think playing TPR is mainly to find out conftown = more valuable than town, and duppin was like a null read since forever for me
slip that theres 3 scum?In post 3692, UNOwen wrote:How does a 1-shot tracker find conftown when there are presumably two scum left?
I was saying we should don't need to rush the day to an end. I still believe we should not execute, even though the choice is the same whoever dies outside the 1v1 will rule things out for the remaining players.In post 3654, duppin wrote:also regarding whether we should lim today or not, UNO is kind of right. Ever since shelly forced a 1v1 between me we can justify limming today simply because it's going to be the exact same players you need to solve tomorrow
wait are kills complusiveIn post 3695, UNOwen wrote:I was saying we should don't need to rush the day to an end. I still believe we should not execute, even though the choice is the same whoever dies outside the 1v1 will rule things out for the remaining players.
And if you get the result "xxxx visited the kill" then they have a near certainty to be scum. I don't see why you would not track someone you were suspicious of in this situation.In post 3694, shellyc wrote:if i got a result of "xxxx visited nobody" they have a statistically higher chance to be town, so we should not elim them
