Ok but why. Throwing some names out means nothing.In post 1124, Froppy wrote:Johnny is a hard scum read for me, your slot continue to seem to try to be opportunistic and I am fairly certain that town has caught scum
-Noraabear
Ok but why. Throwing some names out means nothing.In post 1124, Froppy wrote:Johnny is a hard scum read for me, your slot continue to seem to try to be opportunistic and I am fairly certain that town has caught scum
when did I remove my vote?In post 1126, Swizzle Pop wrote:Also if we are being "opportunistic", why'd u remove ur vote when there is more support on this wagon?
-Noraabear
Im not reading 40 pages. I sincerely do not care what you say about it but I am not reading all that. You want me to skim an ISO or read a few certain pages, I'll do it but I aint going thru and reading 40 pages.In post 1127, Froppy wrote:why don't you read the game if you actually plan on solving
really? if we arent trying to figure out the game state then what are all our questions about? or do you mean our predecessor? and when you say you werent scumreading us does that mean you are now?In post 1122, Froppy wrote:I wasn't scum reading you, but you have been squirming and I don't really see you trying to figure out the game state.
how are we being opportunistic? what wagons are we pushing or latching on to opportunistically?In post 1124, Froppy wrote:Johnny is a hard scum read for me, your slot continue to seem to try to be opportunistic and I am fairly certain that town has caught scum
When shelly told me to move my vote to you I didn't because I had you as neutral and Johnny as scumIn post 1130, Swizzle Pop wrote:really? if we arent trying to figure out the game state then what are all our questions about? or do you mean our predecessor? and when you say you werent scumreading us does that mean you are now?In post 1122, Froppy wrote:I wasn't scum reading you, but you have been squirming and I don't really see you trying to figure out the game state.
-S Twizzle
I paid legit zero attention to you until you started being all weird. Taylor and I both dislike ur slot rn.In post 1131, Froppy wrote:You see me as the weakest player so you are trying to get the wagon thrown onto me, that is your goal. Not to try and solve, not to figure out the game state, you are being opportunistic.
Actually thats a good point, you joined being the wagon so anything you do to get the wagon off comes off as opportunisticIn post 1132, Swizzle Pop wrote:how are we being opportunistic? what wagons are we pushing or latching on to opportunistically?In post 1124, Froppy wrote:Johnny is a hard scum read for me, your slot continue to seem to try to be opportunistic and I am fairly certain that town has caught scum
-F Mizzle
but we havent said that you're scum. we're just asking questions of you, and everyone else. we are trying to get into the game and figure out whats what. we both are coming to scumread you, but its not locked in. i dont see why a townie would give two options, then pick one, then reverse to the other one immediately. and you dont seem to want to give us a readlist which is odd.In post 1131, Froppy wrote:You see me as the weakest player so you are trying to get the wagon thrown onto me, that is your goal. Not to try and solve, not to figure out the game state, you are being opportunistic.
its either town is in a bad place or a good place. you said good place didnt make sense (implicitly choosing the other option), but then immediately changed to thinking town was in a good place after all. i dont understand the underlying thought process there.In post 1137, Froppy wrote:Which option did I reverse?
okayIn post 1140, Swizzle Pop wrote:its either town is in a bad place or a good place. you said good place didnt make sense (implicitly choosing the other option), but then immediately changed to thinking town was in a good place after all. i dont understand the underlying thought process there.In post 1137, Froppy wrote:Which option did I reverse?
-tay is lor
that sounds like typical NM and while i think its ok to use NM as a compromise lunch i think we can prolly do better than a PL here. why johnny though?In post 1141, MiniVirgo wrote:I've caught on to something, I'm not going to say what it is today but I'm against a Swizzle/Froppy/shelly lynch. If I die tonight just feel free to ignore this because I am NOT softing what I've seen but if you see it also don't bring it up or even tell anyone that you've seen it.
As a consolidation vote, I am either voting Johnny or N_M today. My preference is the latter but the former doesn't pain me to do either.
We have three lynches before we lose. Two lynches before we hit LyLo. We have to PL them now if we do it at all as otherwise we leave it too close if they are Town. The reason why, for those that just replaced in, is that they're playstyle is completely and utterly anti-town and I have reasons to think that they're scum as well so this flip is double helpful. They lolhammered derp D1 and they will almost 100% do it again and again until they hammer town in LyLo. We can't let them live.
- JV
I want you to try and get me killedIn post 1148, Swizzle Pop wrote:youd rather we vote you than present your reads? i dont understand this at all
-schwifty