Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Considering how much Denver allowed it and considering Josh actually has trouble against NE historically I am rolling with Herbert in the Final. Let's get a rookie a ring and go for 2 Superbowls
Everybody as we say in Cleveland... All /in!
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
i am prob starting Hurts again so battle of the rookies?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
also, I'm starting the cle defense so I get to beat u with ur own guys
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I may have completely faceplanted in the playoffs in this league, but I'm at least riding Watson/Ridley/Diggs/Henry/Montgomery/new FA pickup Bell (thanks for the injury, CEH!) to an early favorite projection in the finals of my other league. Silver linings!
I feel like since L2 was only ten that only the top 3 should move up meaning the bottom 3 in L1 move down.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 734, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like since L2 was only ten that only the top 3 should move up meaning the bottom 3 in L1 move down.
Yeah I don't disagree. Was just going off the post that showed 4 people were relegated. Also it would give me something to play for this week (other than 3rd place trophy) which would be cool.
In post 731, Nero Cain wrote:also, I'm starting the cle defense so I get to beat u with ur own guys
Rams defense is better than browns at least in the secondary and they sure did great against the jets.
So honestly this doesn’t bother me. Browns will play with a purpose and get the win since they have shot at division still out there and they still need to clinch playoffs. But outside Myles, browns D could use some work next off season
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
3 move or 4 does not bother me since I move even if there is 2 at this point
When I joined this site, I was a software tester for mobile business applications and the song PokerFace was not yet written by Lady Gaga
Now I test lottery and gambling software as my job. It's funny how my life has turned out. Somewhere a Time Traveler is laughing madly
In post 731, Nero Cain wrote:also, I'm starting the cle defense so I get to beat u with ur own guys
Rams defense is better than browns at least in the secondary and they sure did great against the jets.
So honestly this doesn’t bother me. Browns will play with a purpose and get the win since they have shot at division still out there and they still need to clinch playoffs. But outside Myles, browns D could use some work next off season
Myles Garret also isn't near 100% due to COVID complications. They're saying he's doing 4 breathing treatments a day.
In post 734, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like since L2 was only ten that only the top 3 should move up meaning the bottom 3 in L1 move down.
I think this is something that should of been brought up in August. I think changing who gets promoted and relegated less than a week before the league ends is unfair to at least 1 person.
y is it even important that relegation /promotion was set in stone @ the start of the season? It has 0 impact on anything that happens.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
my thinking is that a 10p league is easier than a 12p league and since L2 was easier this year it shouldn't get the 4 it normally does.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Because at this point, you're making a change that directly helps 1 player and punishes another and it not being set in stone means you weren't committed to making that decision for every player. I don't think that "don't change league rules in the middle of the season" is an unreasonable stance, dude.
I mean, that's my feeling and opinions on it and so far Joe and D3 agree with me.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 748, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, that's my feeling and opinions on it and so far Joe and D3 agree with me.
Tbh I think I see panzer's point. While I wouldn't be too sad about missing out on L1 with a loss, I can't say the same for Reck. I think the only way it would be ok would be if everyone who could potentially be affected were to agree to the change.
