Alright I shall drop it.In post 696, Firebringer wrote:i can see why me being snarky about it was annoying to u. I was just bemused by the irony and thought pointing it out. I didn't intend to annoy you with it. But nonethless i did. So sorry about that.
My main problem wasn't this. It was that fire bringer is like "im not gonna interact with my TRs" but they decided to indirectly call me annoying right after I actually made some non fluffy posts. It was rude but there has been an apology and I dont care enough to continue being salty.In post 697, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is interacting with your townreads not of interest to you?
In post 652, superbowl9 wrote:They’re just scummy man can we vote em already
I'll sheep this for now.
My SR on you just disappeared ^^
Oh, nah, I was actually saying that in a fairly tongue in cheek sort of way. I could use a bunch of other words there. Crappy readslist, readslist is crap, shitty readslist, readslist is trash, trashy readslist, readslist is a piece of junk, junky readslist, readslist was bad, readslist was poor, and a dozen more. In the moment tho, it felt most apt/tongue-in-cheek to just go with piece of shit, because it just felt like the delivery that'd be most humorous while conveying my point.In post 605, Guillotina wrote:Did you intent to piss me off by calling my readlist piece of shit? This is a legit question.
[/quote] That easily? Now that's weird!
Not really. I just want you to vote with me to lim my biggest SR.In post 709, Guillotina wrote:That easily? Now that's weird!
I love honesty. More town points for you.In post 710, kookiemonster wrote:Not really. I just want you to vote with me to lim my biggest SR.In post 709, Guillotina wrote:That easily? Now that's weird!
-nornorbear
Yeah that seems pretty shadyIn post 701, kookiemonster wrote:My main problem wasn't this. It was that fire bringer is like "im not gonna interact with my TRs" but they decided to indirectly call me annoying right after I actually made some non fluffy posts. It was rude but there has been an apology and I dont care enough to continue being salty.In post 697, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why is interacting with your townreads not of interest to you?
-norbearbearbear
yes yes I agree.In post 711, Firebringer wrote:the longer sugar cain is away the stronger my suspicions stay
cause them being town doesn't mean i get anything out of engaging with them.In post 716, Gamma Emerald wrote:When it’s a scumread that’s valid
But why would you avoid engaging with townreads, since they can help you with other reads if needed? Tbh the answer’s prob obvious but may as well ask
I tend to ignore my townreads too unless they don't town read me back in which case i engage with them to try to clear doubts. Or unless those townreads raise red flags that make me question my reads on them.In post 718, Firebringer wrote:cause them being town doesn't mean i get anything out of engaging with them.In post 716, Gamma Emerald wrote:When it’s a scumread that’s valid
But why would you avoid engaging with townreads, since they can help you with other reads if needed? Tbh the answer’s prob obvious but may as well ask
their reads could be shit, what do i have to gain by talking to them about their possible shit reads
its actually more valuable to engage with scumreads cause it helps either build a case or disafirm a bad read.
the only reason to read a townie is if u think ur possibly wrong about said townie.
but sometimes i don't want to engage with scumreads either.
While I don't agree 100% with this, I've learned something really beneficial to my growth today.In post 721, Firebringer wrote:i mean i don't find it very useful engaging with town who scumread me unless they want the engagement. I mean if u try to take an active role in someones read of u, they are often just going to double down on whatever read they had of u prior.
thats just how the mind works, as soon as someone sees ur trying to influence it they shield itself from change.